Sometimes an entire story about New York Times bias can come packed into two short sentences of a context paragraph.

A recent article in the Times‘ arts section reported on the Jewish Museum in New York acquiring an artwork by Ruth Patir that was originally intended for the Venice Biennale. As part of the story, the Times offered up this encapsulation of events in Israel and Gaza: “Hamas-led militants killed 1,200 and abducted 240 people. The Israeli military responded with a ferocious military campaign in which more than 41,000 people have been killed, according to local health authorities, including many women and children.”

Can you spot the instances of bias?

The Israeli campaign got labeled as “ferocious,” while the Hamas terrorist attack of last Oct. 7 got no pejorative adjective from the Times. “Ferocious” was just the latest loaded modifier the Times has slapped on Israel’s careful military campaign, which the newspaper has, in its news columns, also called “brutal” and “aggressive.”

The Times has further made a point of mentioning that the Gazans killed include “many women and children.” Yet those killed and abducted by Hamas on Oct. 7 also included many women and children. Why mention the presence of women and children among the Gazans but not among the Israelis? It’s a double standard.

While I’m willing to acknowledge that there surely are innocent children who have been killed in Gaza, it’s also worth mentioning that Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, both ferocious terrorist groups, have themselves deliberately used children as combatants and as human shields. And that some of the innocent children may be victims of misfires of Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad rockets aimed at Israel.

In addition, the “abducted 240 people” sum inaccurately understated the number. The Times elsewhere has reported that “about 250 hostages were captured in the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct, 7, 2023.” The 250 number appeared in another article in the same print edition of the Times as the 240 number, leaving readers at a loss as to which figure to believe. The article about the art exhibit even included a hyperlink to a Times article reporting, “In all, about 250 people were abducted on Oct. 7, according to Israeli officials.” A Washington Post article identified 251 individually by name.

I wrote to the author of the Times article, asking why mention the “women and children” in one case but not the other. I also asked, “Is 240 just a typo that needs correcting from hitting the 4 key instead of the 5, or is the arts section and the woke editors there keeping its own lower count of kidnapped-by-Hamas people than the rest of the Times is?”

No correction has appeared, and I have received no response from the Times to my inquiry. Short of publishing a correction and an editor’s note apologizing for the slanted treatment, what are they going to say? The article speaks for itself, the latest example in a long series of what the former national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, has called the Times’ “constant” anti-Israel bias.

Ira Stoll was managing editor of The Forward and North American editor of The Jerusalem Post. His media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.

The post New York Times Undercounts Israeli Hostages, Smears IDF as ‘Ferocious’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.