RSS
Pierre Poilievre’s plan to speak at a Reform synagogue in Vancouver rouses backlash among liberal members
Members of Vancouver’s LGBTQ community are objecting to a scheduled Feb. 2 appearance by Pierre Poilievre at Temple Sholom, a socially and religiously liberal congregation affiliated with the Union for Reform Journalism.
The federal Conservative leader’s responses to questions about transgender rights, and the fact that audience questions will not be accommodated at the Vancouver event, have been cited as their primary concerns.
During an interview with Toronto news channel CP24, for example, Poilievre stated, “I am not aware of any other genders than men and women.”
Aviva Rathbone, the board chair of JQT, a Vancouver queer and trans non-profit, told The CJN, “Our trans community members are among the most vulnerable, with markedly higher rates of suicide and suicidal thoughts. Mr. Poilievre supports policies that would undoubtedly add to this harm and would see lives impacted in devastating and irreparable ways.
“We’re disappointed that Temple Sholom has chosen to prioritize forming a relationship with Mr. Poilievre over the safety and wellbeing of our community.”
Rathbone said that JQT (pronounced J-Cutie) is hopeful that Temple Sholom will view this as an opportunity to move beyond what she described as “performative allyship” and to learn to listen to the needs of all community members “not just when it’s easy and reflects well on the organization but also when it requires tough decisions.
“Our mandate is to have those difficult discussions and we will continue to hold organizations accountable for listening to the voices of the J-cuties who make up an integral and beautiful part of Vancouver’s Jewish community,” she said.
JQT said in a social media statement released on Thursday that many of its members had contacted them, distressed by Temple Sholom’s choice to host the event and the potential harm it could cause to people in the Jewish LGBTQ community in Vancouver.
The organization reached out to Temple Sholom to express its displeasure and try to persuade the synagogue not to provide “a voice, who clearly stands in opposition to trans rights, and the safety and well-being of our community.“
JQT said it had invited members of Temple’s Sholom’s leadership to address a call to action referred to within its community needs assessment that urges Jewish organizations to adopt a zero-tolerance position on homophobic, transphobic and antisemitic language, practices and policies.
In its social media post, JQT cited a letter written last February by the Reform Jewish Community of Canada (RJCC), to which Temple Sholom belongs, that called on governments at all levels to affirm and preserve transgender rights.
At the time, the RJCC criticized Alberta Premier Danielle Smith for “proposed policies to deny access to healthcare and athletics and placing barriers in educational settings for transgender youth.”
The letter, signed by Len Bates, president of RJCC, and Rabbi Daniel Mikelberg, chair of the Reform Rabbis of Canada, read, “We reaffirm our support for all those who seek to live without fear of harassment, violence, or discrimination, and that our clergy and institutions are committed to caring for and supporting everyone who is affected by this dangerous and widespread assault on trans and queer people.”
Like JQT, the RJCC also pointed out that LGBTQ youth are far more likely than their heterosexual peers to experience suicidal thoughts and thereby any denial of support puts their lives at greater risk.
Similar statements have been made by the U.S.-based Union for Reform Judaism, which is identified as a partner organization at the synagogue where Polievere is scheduled to appear.
“Guided by our Jewish values and the Reform Movement’s long history of supporting LGBTQ+ equality, we remain committed to protecting the civil rights of all people.” Read the Reform Movement’s full response to the slew of state attacks on LGBTQ+ youth: https://t.co/qDCJkBtawl
— The URJ (@URJorg) May 18, 2023
While it is being held at Temple Sholom, the appearance is being organized together with the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) and billed as a community-wide event for the Conservative leader to address the Jewish community of Vancouver. The event is fully booked—and the promotion notes the event will not be livestreamed or recorded.
It is not unusual for Temple Sholom to be a part of events involving the broader Jewish community in Vancouver. In March 2024, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met with local rabbis at the synagogue’s boardroom. Events and rallies for the city’s Jewish community following Oct. 7 have been highlighted on the Temple Sholom website.
Dan Moskovitz, the senior rabbi at Temple Sholom, and Nico Slobinsky, vice president of CIJA, sent a joint statement to The CJN when asked about Poilievre’s appearance on Sunday.
“Temple Sholom, in partnership with CIJA, are hosting an event on Feb. 2 with Mr. Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Official Opposition. At the event Mr. Poilievre will share perspectives on antisemitism and other issues related to the Jewish community,” they said. “Our organizations have proudly hosted similar events over the years for elected representatives and political leaders from all levels of government and parties. We have received an overwhelmingly positive response to the event from members of our community, the event sold out in less than two days.”
According to an email obtained by The Tyee, a news organization based in British Columbia, Moskovitz had asked for a question-and-answer format during Poilievre’s visit—similar to a 2015 event with Trudeau, when the then-leader of the Liberal Party visited the synagogue. Poilievre’s team refused that request and also denied a request to livestream the visit, the publication reported.
Poilievre’s Vancouver Synagogue Visit Is Raising Concerns. The planned speech and photo op leaves some members troubled by the leader’s refusal to take questions, @JenStDen reports. https://t.co/gsWMQtVAwY
Find out more at https://t.co/1zbPY5GAhV pic.twitter.com/0rGY5JPhhg
— National Newswatch (@natnewswatch) January 30, 2025
Members of Vancouver’s Jewish LGBTQ community, some of whom are congregants at Temple Sholom, told The Tyee they are dismayed that Poilievre would refrain from answering questions, including ones on transgender rights. They also wanted to ask him about his praise of Elon Musk, particularly after the Tesla CEO performed what some have interpreted as a Nazi salute at US President Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.
Poilievre has been a staunch defender of Israel and has repeatedly spoken out against antisemitism on college campuses and elsewhere following the Oct. 7 attacks in Israel.
On Jan. 27, to mark International Holocaust Remembrance Day, Poilievre said that his party stands “in solidarity with Canada’s Jewish community to honour the memory of the 6 million innocent live murdered in the Holocaust. In a dark time of rampant antisemitism in Canada, Conservatives unequivocally condemn the world’s most enduring form of hatred.”
The post Pierre Poilievre’s plan to speak at a Reform synagogue in Vancouver rouses backlash among liberal members appeared first on The Canadian Jewish News.
RSS
Syria’s Sharaa Says Talks With Israel Could Yield Results ‘In Coming Days’

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks at the opening ceremony of the 62nd Damascus International Fair, the first edition held since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, in Damascus, Syria, Aug. 27, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa said on Wednesday that ongoing negotiations with Israel to reach a security pact could lead to results “in the coming days.”
He told reporters in Damascus the security pact was a “necessity” and that it would need to respect Syria’s airspace and territorial unity and be monitored by the United Nations.
Syria and Israel are in talks to reach an agreement that Damascus hopes will secure a halt to Israeli airstrikes and the withdrawal of Israeli troops who have pushed into southern Syria.
Reuters reported this week that Washington was pressuring Syria to reach a deal before world leaders gather next week for the UN General Assembly in New York.
But Sharaa, in a briefing with journalists including Reuters ahead of his expected trip to New York to attend the meeting, denied the US was putting any pressure on Syria and said instead that it was playing a mediating role.
He said Israel had carried out more than 1,000 strikes on Syria and conducted more than 400 ground incursions since Dec. 8, when the rebel offensive he led toppled former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.
Sharaa said Israel’s actions were contradicting the stated American policy of a stable and unified Syria, which he said was “very dangerous.”
He said Damascus was seeking a deal similar to a 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria that created a demilitarized zone between the two countries.
He said Syria sought the withdrawal of Israeli troops but that Israel wanted to remain at strategic locations it seized after Dec. 8, including Mount Hermon. Israeli ministers have publicly said Israel intends to keep control of the sites.
He said if the security pact succeeds, other agreements could be reached. He did not provide details, but said a peace agreement or normalization deal like the US-mediated Abraham Accords, under which several Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic ties with Israel, was not currently on the table.
He also said it was too early to discuss the fate of the Golan Heights because it was “a big deal.”
Reuters reported this week that Israel had ruled out handing back the zone, which Donald Trump unilaterally recognized as Israeli during his first term as US president.
“It’s a difficult case – you have negotiations between a Damascene and a Jew,” Sharaa told reporters, smiling.
SECURITY PACT DERAILED IN JULY
Sharaa also said Syria and Israel had been just “four to five days” away from reaching the basis of a security pact in July, but that developments in the southern province of Sweida had derailed those discussions.
Syrian troops were deployed to Sweida in July to quell fighting between Druze armed factions and Bedouin fighters. But the violence worsened, with Syrian forces accused of execution-style killings and Israel striking southern Syria, the defense ministry in Damascus and near the presidential palace.
Sharaa on Wednesday described the strikes near the presidential palace as “not a message, but a declaration of war,” and said Syria had still refrained from responding militarily to preserve the negotiations.
RSS
Anti-Israel Activists Gear Up to ‘Flood’ UN General Assembly

US Capitol Police and NYPD officers clash with anti-Israel demonstrators, on the day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a joint meeting of Congress, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, July 24, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Umit Bektas
Anti-Israel groups are planning a wave of raucous protests in New York City during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) over the next several days, prompting concerns that the demonstrations could descend into antisemitic rhetoric and intimidation.
A coalition of anti-Israel activists is organizing the protests in and around UN headquarters to coincide with speeches from Middle Eastern leaders and appearances by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The demonstrations are expected to draw large crowds and feature prominent pro-Palestinian voices, some of whom have been criticized for trafficking in antisemitic tropes, in addition to calling for the destruction of Israe.
Organizers of the demonstrations have promoted the coordinated events on social media as an opportunity to pressure world leaders to hold Israel accountable for its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, with some messaging framed in sharply hostile terms.
On Sunday, for example, activists shouted at Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon.
“Zionism is terrorism. All you guys are terrorists committing ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza and Palestine. Shame on you, Zionist animals,” they shouted.
BREAKING: PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTORS CONFRONT “ISRAELI” AMBASSADOR DANNY DANON AT THE UNITED NATIONS
1/5 pic.twitter.com/4G1VYEMGzV
— Within Our Lifetime (@WOLPalestine) September 14, 2025
The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), warned on its website that the scale and tone of the planned demonstrations risk crossing the line from political protest into hate speech, arguing that anti-Israel activists are attempting to hijack the UN gathering to spread antisemitism and delegitimize the Jewish state’s right to exist.
Outside the UN last week, masked protesters belonging to the activist group INDECLINE kicked a realistic replica of Netanyahu’s decapitated head as though it were a soccer ball.
US activist group plays soccer with Bibi’s mock decapitated HEAD right outside NYC UN HQ
Peep shot at 00:40
Footage posted by INDECLINE collective just as UN General Assembly about to kick off
‘Following the game, ball was donated to Palestinian Genocide Museum’ pic.twitter.com/TQ84sgZhKr
— RT (@RT_com) September 9, 2025
Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a radical anti-Israel activist group, has vowed to “flood” the UNGA on behalf of the pro-Palestine movement.
WOL, one of the most prolific anti-Israel activist groups, came under immense fire after it organized a protest against an exhibition to honor the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre at the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel. During the event, the group chanted “resistance is justified when people are occupied!” and “Israel, go to hell!”
“We will be there to confront them with the truth: Their silence and inaction enable genocide. The world cannot continue as if Gaza does not exist,” WOL said of its planned demonstrations in New York. “This is the time to make our voices impossible to ignore. Come to New York by any means necessary, to stand, to march, to demand the UN act and end the siege.”
Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), two other anti-Israel organizations that have helped organize widespread demonstrations against the Jewish state during the war in Gaza, also announced they are planning a march from Times Square to the UN headquarters on Friday.
“The time is now for each and every UN member state to uphold their duty under international law: sanction Israel and end the genocide,” the groups said in a statement.
JVP, an organization that purports to fight for “Palestinian liberation,” has positioned itself as a staunch adversary of the Jewish state. The group argued in a 2021 booklet that Jews should not write Hebrew liturgy because hearing the language would be “deeply traumatizing” to Palestinians. JVP has repeatedly defended the Oct. 7 massacre of roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel by Hamas as a justified “resistance.” Chapters of the organization have urged other self-described “progressives” to throw their support behind Hamas and other terrorist groups against Israel
Similarly, PYM, another radical anti-Israel group, has repeatedly defended terrorism and violence against the Jewish state. PYM has organized many anti-Israel protests in the two years following the Oct. 7 attacks in the Jewish state. Recently, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) called for a federal investigation into the organization after Aisha Nizar, one of the group’s leaders, urged supporters to sabotage the US supply chain for the F-35 fighter jet, one of the most advanced US military assets and a critical component of Israel’s defense.
The UN General Assembly has historically been a flashpoint for heated debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Previous gatherings have seen dueling demonstrations outside the Manhattan venue, with pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups both seeking to influence the international spotlight.
While warning about the demonstrations, CAM noted it recently launched a new mobile app, Report It, that allows users worldwide to quickly and securely report antisemitic incidents in real time.
RSS
Nina Davidson Presses Universities to Back Words With Action as Jewish Students Return to Campus Amid Antisemitism Crisis

Nina Davidson on The Algemeiner’s ‘J100’ podcast. Photo: Screenshot
Philanthropist Nina Davidson, who served on the board of Barnard College, has called on universities to pair tough rhetoric on combatting antisemitism with enforcement as Jewish students returned to campuses for the new academic year.
“Years ago, The Algemeiner had published a list ranking the most antisemitic colleges in the country. And number one was Columbia,” Davidson recalled on a recent episode of The Algemeiner‘s “J100” podcast. “As a board member and as someone who was representing the institution, it really upset me … At the board meeting, I brought it up and I said, ‘What are we going to do about this?’”
Host David Cohen, chief executive officer of The Algemeiner, explained he had revisited Davidson’s remarks while she was being honored for her work at The Algemeiner‘s 8th annual J100 gala, held in October 2021, noting their continued relevance.
“It could have been the same speech in 2025,” he said, underscoring how longstanding concerns about campus antisemitism, while having intensified in the aftermath of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, are not new.
Davidson argued that universities already possess the tools to protect students – codes of conduct, time-place-manner rules, and consequences for threats or targeted harassment – but too often fail to apply them evenly. “Statements are not enough,” she said, arguing that institutions need to enforce their rules and set a precedent that there will be consequences for individuals who refuse to follow them.
She also said that stakeholders – alumni, parents, and donors – are reassessing their relationships with schools that, in their view, have not safeguarded Jewish students. While supportive of open debate, Davidson distinguished between protest and intimidation, calling for leadership that protects expression while ensuring campus safety.
The episode surveyed specific pressure points that administrators will face this fall: repeat anti-Israel encampments, disruptions of Jewish programming, and the challenge of distinguishing political speech from conduct that violates university rules. “Unless schools draw those lines now,” Davidson warned, “they’ll be scrambling once the next crisis hits.”
Cohen closed by framing the discussion as a test of institutional credibility, asking whether universities will “turn policy into protection” in real time. Davidson agreed, pointing to students who “need to know the rules aren’t just on paper.”
The full conversation is available on The Algemeiner’s “J100” podcast.