RSS
Three Teachings for a Time of Rebuilding in a Time of War
The Israeli flag at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. Photo: Hynek Moravec via Wikimedia Commons.
Each summer, Jerusalem fills with the sounds of the Torah — teenagers on travel programs, college students in immersive fellowships, and adults in seminar rooms. The city becomes a meeting place for Jews from around the world who come to study, reflect, and reconnect. Israeli educators travel abroad to camps, campuses, and communities — bringing with them a spirit of learning and encounter.
This year, that rhythm has fallen quiet.
The war with Iran has changed the summer entirely. There are the loud and obvious consequences of the war; for those in Israel, families shelter in safe rooms and people are killed and injured among the destruction of buildings. In the US, fractures in communities become deeper or in some cases become temporarily mended while record antisemitism continues to build.
A quieter consequence is the loss of shared learning — of people encountering one another through Torah and then taking these lessons, encounters, and values back to their communities. Living in Jerusalem, I feel this absence deeply. I miss seeing groups walking to class, overhearing debates over texts, or passing a café and hearing the sound of someone studying aloud. These should be the sounds of Jewish life in motion.
The loss of this learning is more than a missed summer of knowledge or an insight forever lost; the silence is reminiscent of similar absences of Torah study in previous generations amid war, infighting and disagreement of the time. This isn’t the first time the Jewish people globally are fractured by religious, political, and ideological differences. We are in a time that requires rebuilding.
Early Teachings Offer a Blueprint
Just before Shavuot, my family gathered for a weekend together. My father, a rabbi and my teacher, led a short learning session. He spoke about how Torah has been carried through generations — and paused to reflect on a particular moment in Jewish history.
During the early years of the return from the Babylonian exile, known as Shivat Tzion, Ezra and a group of leaders known as the Men of the Great Assembly helped lay the groundwork for rebuilding Jewish life. One of their earliest recorded teachings appears in the opening mishnah of Pirkei Avot:
Be deliberate in judgment. Raise many students. Make a fence around the Torah.
This line seems somewhat legalistic and procedural, but over time — and especially now — I’ve come to understand how essential this early teaching really is.
A Time of Transition
The historical context matters. The Men of the Great Assembly lived in a time of dislocation and uncertainty. The First Temple had been destroyed, and the majority of Jews in Israel were exiled. Some Jews returned to the land; others stayed behind. Those who returned met people who had never left — and the gaps between them were real. There were cultural differences, political divisions, and religious disagreements. Prophecy was nearing its end. The Temple had not yet been rebuilt. The people were no longer united by place or power, but by the fragile work of reconnection.
That sense of in-between defines our current moment as well. The war with Iran is still unfolding and represents another front in a broader war that has shaken the Jewish world for months. But long before the current crisis, our communities were experiencing division — over politics, identity, values, and the role of Israel in Jewish life. This war did not create the fractures, but it has revealed how deep and unresolved they are.
These three teachings from the Men of the Great Assembly are practical, intentional responses to instability — then and now.
Deliberate in Judgment: Slowing Down to Rebuild Trust
The instruction to “be deliberate in judgment” was not just for legal courts. It was a principle of leadership. At the time of the Men of the Great Assembly, the Jewish people were emerging from exile, returning to a broken land and a divided society. The stakes were high and trust was fragile.
In moments like these, leadership requires restraint. Judgment — by scholars, elders, teachers, and community leaders — had to be thoughtful, measured, and careful. It demanded the ability to listen fully before speaking, to weigh perspectives before drawing lines, and to resist the pressure to respond quickly.
That need is just as urgent now. We live in a time when relationships have been strained, communities have been tested, and public trust is eroding. In the wake of this crisis — amid fear, anger, and uncertainty — there is real risk in responding too fast. Being deliberate is a form of responsibility. It is what allows judgment to be a source of healing rather than division. And it is what will allow us to lead wisely as we begin the long work of rebuilding what has been damaged — within us, and between us.
Raise Many Students: A Strategy for Ensuring a Future
The second teaching — “Raise many students” — was a bold shift in educational vision. As an antidote to the internal and external threats they were facing, the Men of the Great Assembly chose to expand access to Torah. They built a culture in which learning became widely available, and in doing so, they shaped a future in which Torah could take root across all layers of society.
This was not simply about numbers. It was a commitment to reach more people with meaningful teaching. Opening the gates of Torah meant training more teachers, welcoming more students, and placing education at the heart of communal life. That decision turned Torah into a shared inheritance rather than a guarded tradition.
Today, that same commitment is essential. In the midst of war, and after years of disconnection and division, Jewish life must prioritize learning as an antidote. We need more spaces of Torah. More voices of Torah. More people who see themselves as learners, guides, and transmitters. Not only within institutions, but in everyday life — wherever people gather with intention. We could all benefit from an openness to expanding our own definition of “teacher” and “student.”
A thriving Jewish future requires more teaching. And teaching requires students—many of them.
Make a Fence Around the Torah: Protecting What Guides Us
The third instruction—“Make a fence around the Torah”—was given during a time of instability. The Jewish people had returned from exile to a fractured land, a destroyed Temple, and a fragile sense of identity. The Men of the Great Assembly recognized that rebuilding physical structures wasn’t enough. They needed to reinforce the spiritual foundations that would carry the community forward.
They created boundaries to help ensure that Torah would remain central, serious, and protected. A fence is not a barrier to keep people out—it is a signal that something sacred stands within. It invites care, focus, and commitment.
We are again living in a moment of rupture. The war, and the months of pain that preceded it, have unsettled Jewish life across the world. In times like this, we need Torah to be more than symbolic. It needs to be a source of direction, strength, and clarity.
That means creating spaces where Torah is held with intention. Where learning is real and tradition is carried with depth. This is how we begin to restore what has been frayed—by returning to what holds us steady.
The Blueprint for Rebuilding
These three teachings — deliberation, education, and preservation — form a remarkably durable framework. They offer direction for how to emerge from years of loss, argument, and exhaustion. When the future is unclear, we begin by grounding ourselves in what has always sustained us. We think carefully. We teach generously. We protect what matters.
There’s a verse in Proverbs: “Wisdom cries out in the street; in the public squares she raises her voice.” And the midrash explains: these are the voices of learners and teachers, filling synagogues and study halls with the sound of Torah.
May we walk again through the streets of Jerusalem and hear that sound — of students gathered, teachers guiding, Torah being shared — and may it represent the healing and rebuilding of our global Jewish community.
Shuki is the founder and CEO of M²: The Institute for Experiential Jewish Education. Previously, Shuki served as director of Service Learning and Experiential Education at Yeshiva University, where he founded the Certificate Program in Experiential Jewish Education and a range of programs mobilizing college students to serve underprivileged communities worldwide. Shuki has lived in Israel, New York, and South Africa. A Schusterman Fellow, Shuki studied Jewish philosophy, education, and scriptwriting and currently lives in Jerusalem with his wife and their four children.
The post Three Teachings for a Time of Rebuilding in a Time of War first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Harvard Faculty Oppose Deal With Trump, Distancing From Hamas Apologists: Crimson Poll
Harvard University president Alan Garber attending the 373rd Commencement Exercises at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, May 23, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
A recently published Harvard Crimson poll of over 1,400 Harvard faculty revealed sweeping opposition to interim university President Alan Garber’s efforts to strike a deal with the federal government to restore $3 billion in research grants and contracts it froze during the first 100 days of the second Trump administration.
In the survey, conducted from April 23 to May 12, 71 percent of arts and sciences faculty oppose negotiating a settlement with the administration, which may include concessions conservatives have long sought from elite higher education, such as meritocratic admissions, viewpoint diversity, and severe disciplinary sanctions imposed on students who stage unauthorized protests that disrupt academic life.
Additionally, 64 percent “strongly disagree” with shuttering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, 73 percent oppose rejecting foreign applicants who hold anti-American beliefs which are “hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence,” and 70 percent strongly disagree with revoking school recognition from pro-Hamas groups such as the Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC).
“More than 98 percent of faculty who responded to the survey supported the university’s decision to sue the White House,” The Crimson reported. “The same percentage backed Harvard’s public rejection of the sweeping conditions that the administration set for maintaining the funds — terms that included external audits of Harvard’s hiring practices and the disciplining of student protesters.”
Alyza Lewin of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law told The Algemeiner that the poll results indicate that Harvard University will continue to struggle to address campus antisemitism on campus, as there is now data showing that its faculty reject the notion of excising intellectualized antisemitism from the university.
“If you, for example, have faculty teaching courses that are regularly denying that the Jews are a people and erasing the Jewish people’s history in the land of Israel, that’s going to undermine your efforts to address the antisemitism on your campus,” Lewin explained. “When Israel is being treated as the ‘collective Jew,’ when the conversation is not about Israel’s policies, when the criticism is not what the [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism] would call criticism of Israel similar to that against any other country, they have to understand that it is the demonization, delegitimization, and applying a double standard to Jews as individuals or to Israel.”
She added, “Faculty must recognize … the demonization, vilification, the shunning, and the marginalizing of Israelis, Jews, and Zionists, when it happens, as violations of the anti-discrimination policies they are legally and contractually obligated to observe.”
The Crimson survey results were published amid reports that Garber was working to reach a deal with the Trump administration that is palatable to all interested parties, including the university’s left-wing social milieu.
According to a June 26 report published by The Crimson, Garber held a phone call with major donors in which he “confirmed in response to a question from [Harvard Corporation Fellow David M. Rubenstein] that talks had resumed” but “declined to share specifics of how Harvard expected to settle with the White House.”
On June 30, the Trump administration issued Harvard a “notice of violation” of civil rights law following an investigation which examined how it responded to dozens of antisemitic incidents reported by Jewish students since the 2023-2024 academic year.
The correspondence, sent by the Joint Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, charged that Harvard willfully exposed Jewish students to a torrent of racist and antisemitic abuse following the Hamas-led Oct. 7 massacre, which precipitated a surge in anti-Zionist activity on the campus, both in the classroom and out of it.
“Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard’s relationship with the federal government,” wrote the four federal officials comprising the multiagency Task Force. “Harvard may of course continue to operate free of federal privileges, and perhaps such an opportunity will spur a commitment to excellence that will help Harvard thrive once again.”
The Trump administration ratcheted up pressure on Harvard again on Wednesday, reporting the institution to its accreditor for alleged civil rights violations resulting from its weak response to reports of antisemitic bullying, discrimination, and harassment following the Oct. 7, 2023 massacre.
Citing Harvard’s failure to treat antisemitism as seriously as it treated other forms of hatred in the past, The US Department of Educationthe called on the New England Commission of Higher Education to review and, potentially, revoke its accreditation — a designation which qualifies Harvard for federal funding and attests to the quality of the educational services its provides.
“Accrediting bodies play a significant role in preserving academic integrity and a campus culture conducive to truth seeking and learning,” said Secretary of Education Linda McMahon. “Part of that is ensuring students are safe on campus and abiding by federal laws that guarantee educational opportunities to all students. By allowing anti-Semitic harassment and discrimination to persist unchecked on its campus, Harvard University has failed in its obligation to students, educators, and American taxpayers.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post Harvard Faculty Oppose Deal With Trump, Distancing From Hamas Apologists: Crimson Poll first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Balancing Act: Lebanese President Aoun Affirms Hope for Peace with Israel, Balks At Normalization
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, March 28, 2025. REUTERS/Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Friday carefully affirmed his country’s desire for peace with Israel while cautioning that Beirut is not ready to normalize relations with its southern neighbor.
Aoun called for a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory, according to a statement from his office, while reaffirming his government’s efforts to uphold a state monopoly on arms amid mounting international pressure on the Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah to disarm.
“The decision to restrict arms is final and there is no turning back on it,” Aoun said.
The Lebanese leader drew a clear distinction between pursuing peace and establishing formal normalization in his country’s relationship with the Jewish state.
“Peace is the lack of a state of war, and this is what matters to us in Lebanon at the moment,” Aoun said in a statement. “As for the issue of normalization, it is not currently part of Lebanese foreign policy.”
Aoun’s latest comments come after Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar expressed interest last month in normalizing ties with Lebanon and Syria — an effort Jerusalem says cannot proceed until Hezbollah is fully disarmed.
Earlier this week, Aoun sent his government’s response to a US-backed disarmament proposal as Washington and Jerusalem increased pressure on Lebanon to neutralize the terror group.
While the details remain confidential, US Special Envoy Thomas Barrack said he was “unbelievably satisfied” with their response.
This latest proposal, presented to Lebanese officials during Barrack’s visit on June 19, calls for Hezbollah to be fully disarmed within four months in exchange for Israel halting airstrikes and withdrawing troops from its five occupied posts in southern Lebanon.
However, Hezbollah chief Sheikh Naim Qassem vowed in a televised speech to keep the group’s weapons, rejecting Washington’s disarmament proposal.
“How can you expect us not to stand firm while the Israeli enemy continues its aggression, continues to occupy the five points, and continues to enter our territories and kill?” said Qassem, who succeeded longtime terrorist leader Hassan Nasrallah after Israel killed him last year.
“We will not be part of legitimizing the occupation in Lebanon and the region,” the terrorist leader continued. “We will not accept normalization [with Israel].”
Last fall, Israel decimated Hezbollah’s leadership and military capabilities with an air and ground offensive, following the group’s attacks on Jerusalem — which they claimed were a show of solidarity with the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas amid the war in Gaza.
In November, Lebanon and Israel reached a US-brokered ceasefire agreement that ended a year of fighting between the Jewish state and Hezbollah.
Under the agreement, Israel was given 60 days to withdraw from southern Lebanon, allowing the Lebanese army and UN forces to take over security as Hezbollah disarms and moves away from Israel’s northern border.
However, Israel maintained troops at several posts in southern Lebanon beyond the ceasefire deadline, as its leaders aimed to reassure northern residents that it was safe to return home.
Jerusalem has continued carrying out strikes targeting remaining Hezbollah activity, with Israeli leaders accusing the group of maintaining combat infrastructure, including rocket launchers — calling this “blatant violations of understandings between Israel and Lebanon.”
The post Balancing Act: Lebanese President Aoun Affirms Hope for Peace with Israel, Balks At Normalization first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Peace Meals: Chef José Andrés Says ‘Good People’ On Both Sides of Gaza Conflict Ill-Served By Leaders, Food Can Bridge Divide
Chef and head of World Central Kitchen Jose Andres attends the Milken Institute Global Conference 2025 in Beverly Hills, California, US, May 5, 2025. Photo: Reuters/Mike Blake.
Renowned Spanish chef and World Central Kitchen (WCK) founder José Andrés called the Oct. 7 attack “horrendous” in an interview Wednesday and shared his hopes for reconciliation between the “vast majority” on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian divide who are “good people that very often are not served well by their leaders”
WCK is a US-based, nonprofit organization that provides fresh meals to people in conflict zones around the world. The charity has been actively serving Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank since the Oct. 7 massacre in southern Israel. Since the Hamas attack, WCK has served more than 133 million meals across Gaza, according to its website.
The restaurateur and humanitarian has been quoted saying in past interviews that “sometimes very big problems have very simple solutions.” On Wednesday’s episode of the Wall Street Journal podcast “Bold Names,” he was asked to elaborate on that thought. He responded by saying he believes good meals and good leaders can help resolve issues between Israelis and Palestinians, who, he believes, genuinely want to live harmoniously with each other.
“I had people in Gaza, mothers, women making bread,” he said. “Moments that you had of closeness they were telling you: ‘What Hamas did was wrong. I wouldn’t [want] anybody to do this to my children.’ And I had Israelis that even lost family members. They say, ‘I would love to go to Gaza to be next to the people to show them that we respect them …’ And this to me is very fascinating because it’s the reality.
“Maybe some people call me naive. [But] the vast majority of the people are good people that very often are not served well by their leaders. And the simple reality of recognizing that many truths can be true at the same time in the same phrase that what happened on October 7th was horrendous and was never supposed to happen. And that’s why World Central Kitchen was there next to the people in Israel feeding in the kibbutz from day one, and at the same time that I defended obviously the right of Israel to defend itself and to try to bring back the hostages. Equally, what is happening in Gaza is not supposed to be happening either.”
Andres noted that he supports Israel’s efforts to target Hamas terrorists but then seemingly accused Israel of “continuously” targeting children and civilians during its military operations against the terror group.
“We need leaders that believe in that, that believe in longer tables,” he concluded. “It’s so simple to invest in peace … It’s so simple to do good. It’s so simple to invest in a better tomorrow. Food is a solution to many of the issues we’re facing. Let’s hope that … one day in the Middle East it’ll be people just celebrating the cultures that sometimes if you look at what they eat, they seem all to eat exactly the same.”
In 2024, WCK fired at least 62 of its staff members in Gaza after Israel said they had ties to terrorist groups. In one case, Israel discovered that a WCK employee named Ahed Azmi Qdeih took part in the deadly Hamas rampage across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Qdeih was killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza in November 2024.
In April 2024, the Israel Defense Forces received backlash for carrying out airstrikes on a WCK vehicle convoy which killed seven of the charity’s employees. Israel’s military chief, Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi, said the airstrikes were “a mistake that followed a misidentification,” and Israel dismissed two senior officers as a result of the mishandled military operation.
The strikes “were not just some unfortunate mistake in the fog of war,” Andrés alleged.
“It was a direct attack on clearly marked vehicles whose movements were known by” the Israeli military, he claimed in an op-ed published by Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot. “It was also the direct result of [the Israeli] government’s policy to squeeze humanitarian aid to desperate levels.”
In a statement on X, Andres accused Israel of “indiscriminate killing,” saying the Jewish state “needs to stop restricting humanitarian aid, stop killing civilians and aid workers, and stop using food as a weapon.”
The post Peace Meals: Chef José Andrés Says ‘Good People’ On Both Sides of Gaza Conflict Ill-Served By Leaders, Food Can Bridge Divide first appeared on Algemeiner.com.