Connect with us

RSS

Why Democrats Are Losing Ground: Failing Policy, Fueling Division, and Silencing Jewish Voices

US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) are seen before a press conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2024. Photo: Craig Hudson/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect

The Democratic Party once stood for pragmatic governance, principled coalition-building, and evidence-driven discourse. Today, it increasingly leans on emotional sloganeering, ideological purity tests, and performative outrage — undermining its own agenda and fracturing the national dialogue.

As a newly moderate-centrist who left the Democratic Party, and as a Jewish, Israeli-American and LGBT activist committed to democracy and societal cohesion, I watch with growing concern as my former political home drifts further from practical leadership and intellectual honesty.

Rather than condemning the hijacking of progressive causes by radical ideologies, Democratic leaders remain silent — or worse, complicit — by embracing coalitions that tolerate or promote anti-Jewish rhetoric.

Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and other members of “The Squad” have not just vocally supported Palestinian causes, but often echoed rhetoric that delegitimizes Israel and veers into antisemitism.

For example, Ocasio-Cortez stated she agreed “10,000%” with the claim that the Abraham Accords “directly led” to the Hamas terror attack on October 7, 2023. She and her allies have also objected to Democratic leadership decisions that exclude pro-Hamas and extremist pro-Palestinian speakers from party events, demanding more space for anti-Israel narratives.

A distorted political framework now prevails, reducing complex geopolitical realities into binary moral narratives and blaming Jews and Israelis without nuance. This approach not only sabotages democratic discourse — it puts lives at risk.

According to FBI data, American Jews — only 2.4% of the population — are victims of more than half of all religion-based hate crimes. Yet leading Democrats frequently delay or dilute their condemnation of such hate unless it fits partisan or ideological interests. This inconsistency alienates Jewish communities and erodes trust.

The targeting of Jews within progressive movements has escalated dangerously. In June 2024, multiple Gay Pride events across the US disinvited Jewish and Israeli LGBTQ+ groups, citing vague “community safety” concerns.

That trend worsened in 2025: Jews, Israelis, Zionists, and those vocally supporting Israel were again disinvited or excluded from Pride, and many others decided not to participate out of fear due to warnings from the FBI and recent anti-Jewish terror attacks in the US. Many Jewish attendees feared even showing up. I have witnessed this firsthand as an activist, and have documented it in multiple publications, including:

At the 2024 Pride March in Washington, D.C., I and members of my group were physically assaulted in an anti-Jewish hate crime.

In 2025, during the World Pride March in D.C., we were verbally taunted and harassed merely for showing up as proud Jewish Zionists. These weren’t isolated incidents — they reflect a broader problem ignored by Democratic leadership.

Meanwhile, Democratic rhetoric surrounding immigration and law enforcement further exposes the party’s incoherence. President Biden’s administration continued deportations in significant numbers — ICE removed nearly 142,000 individuals in FY 2023. And this isn’t new. Hillary Clinton herself said during her 2016 campaign, “If they’ve committed a crime, deport them.”

So why are today’s Democrats staging protests against policies they once endorsed? Why conflate ICE with ethnic persecution while ignoring actual authoritarianism abroad? Because opposition to Trump has become their organizing principle. Facts no longer matter. Policy consistency has vanished.

This reflexive posture damages their own agenda. When Republicans uphold or improve upon policies Democrats previously advocated, Democrats refuse to engage — not because the policy is wrong, but because Trump is involved. It’s a form of partisan absolutism that undermines national cohesion and forfeits opportunities for pragmatic progress.

A striking example of this inconsistency can be seen in the Democrats’ shifting stance on Iran. In June 2025, the US launched coordinated strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities — Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — crippling Tehran’s nuclear enrichment capabilities.

For more than a decade, prominent Democratic leaders — including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris — have asserted that Iran must never be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons, and that military force should remain on the table.

Then-Senator Hillary Clinton said in 2008 that the US could “totally obliterate” Iran if it developed or dared to use nuclear weapons against Israel or any other state. Vice President Kamala Harris reiterated in October 2024 that she “will never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon” and would “take whatever action is necessary” to defend American interests and allies. Yet now, when the Trump administration has finally taken the very action Democrats previously promised, many of those same voices condemn it. Why are Democrats now vilifying the fulfillment of a policy they long championed? Is the issue the policy itself — or simply the president who enacted it?

A Jewish Electorate Institute poll in 2024 showed increasing concern among Jewish voters that Democrats are not adequately addressing antisemitism. The result? A shift. More Jewish voters — and socially liberal, but politically centrist individuals like myself — are rethinking their alignment. While no party is perfect, the Republican Party increasingly speaks with clarity against antisemitism, supports Israel unapologetically, and acts in accordance with legal norms.

If the Democrats wish to regain moral and political traction, they must:

  1. Stop importing foreign conflicts into domestic protests. Palestinian flags belong in debates about the Middle East, not in ICE demonstrations or Pride parades.
  2. Publicly and consistently condemn antisemitism — even when it comes from within their own coalitions.
  3. Refocus on fact-based policymaking, not reactionary theatrics.
  4. Recognize overlapping policy goals and cooperate across party lines when appropriate.
  5. Welcome Jewish, Israeli, and Zionist voices, rather than scapegoating or excluding them from progressive spaces.

Unity requires courage. Democrats must choose between being a party of democratic pluralism — or one of ideological gatekeeping and double standards.

Yuval David is an Emmy and Multi-Award-Winning Actor, Filmmaker, Journalist, and Jewish LGBTQ+ activist and advisor. A creative and compelling storyteller, on stage and screen, news and across social media, Yuval shares the narrative of Jewish activism and enduring hope. Follow him on Instagram, YouTube, and X.

The post Why Democrats Are Losing Ground: Failing Policy, Fueling Division, and Silencing Jewish Voices first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

‘Fine Scholar’: UC Berkeley Chancellor Praises Professor Who Expressed Solidarity With Oct. 7 Attacks

University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. Photo: Allison Bailey via Reuters Connect.

The chancellor of University of California, Berkeley described a professor who cheered the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre across southern Israel a “fine scholar” during a congressional hearing held at Capitol Hill on Tuesday.

Richard K. Lyons, who assumed the chancellorship in July 2024 issued the unmitigated praise while being questioned by members of the House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce, which summoned him and the chief administrators of two other major universities to interrogate their handling of the campus antisemitism crisis.

Lyons stumbled into the statement while being questioned by Rep. Lisa McClain (R-MI), who asked Lyons to describe the extent of his relationship and correspondence with Professor Ussama Makdisi, who tweeted in Feb. 2024 that he “could have been one of those who broke through the siege on October 7.”

“What do you think the professor meant,” McClain asked Lyons, to which the chancellor responded, “I believe it was a celebration of the terrorist attack on October 7.” McClain proceeded to ask if Lyons discussed the tweet with Makdisi or personally reprimanded him, prompting an exchange of remarks which concluded with Lyons’s saying, “He is a fine scholar.”

Lyon’s comment came after nearly three hours in which the group of university leaders — which included Dr. Robert Groves, president of Georgetown University, and Dr. Felix V. Matos Rodriguez, chancellor of the City University of New York (CUNY) — offered gaffe-free, deliberately worded answers to the members’ questions to avoid eliciting the kind of public relations ordeal which prematurely ended the tenures of two Ivy League presidents in 2024 following an education committee held in Dec. 2023.

Rep. McClain later criticized Lyons on social media, calling his comment “totally disgraceful.” She added, “Faculty must be held accountable and Jewish students deserve better.”

CUNY chancellor Rodriguez also triggered a rebuke from the committee members in which he was also described as a “disgrace.”

As previously reported by The Algemeiner, CUNY campuses have been lambasted by critics as some of the most antisemitic institutions of higher education in the United States. Last year, the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) resolved half a dozen investigations of antisemitism on CUNY campuses, one of which involved Jewish students who were pressured into saying that Jews are White people who should be excluded from discussions about social justice.

During Tuesday’s hearing Rodriguez acknowledged that antisemitic incidents continue to disrupt Jewish academic life, disclosing that 84 complaints of antisemitism have been formally reported to CUNY administrators since 2024. 15 were filed in 2025 alone, but CUNY, he said, has published only 18 students for antisemitic conduct. Rodriguez went on to denounce efforts to pressure CUNY into adopting the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, saying, “I have repudiated BDS and I have said there’s no place for BDS at the City University of New York.”

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) remarked, however, that Rodriguez has allegedly done little to address antisemitism in the CUNY faculty union, the Professional Staff Congress (PSC), which has passed several resolutions endorsing BDS and whose members, according to 2021 ruling rendered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), discriminated against Professor Jeffrey Lax by holding meetings on Shabbat to prevent him and other Jews from attending them.

“The PSC does not speak for the City University of New York,” Rodriquez protested. “We’ve been clear on our commitment against antisemitism and against BDS.”

Later, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), whose grilling of higher education officials who appear before the committee has created several viral moments, rejected Rodriguez’s responses as disingenuous.

“It’s all words, no action. You have failed the people of New York,” she told the chancellor. “You have failed Jewish students in New York State, and it is a disgrace.”

Following the hearing, The Lawfare Project, legal nonprofit which provides legal services free of charge to Jewish victims of civil rights violations, applauded the education committee for publicizing antisemitism at CUNY.

“I am thankful for the many members of Congress who worked with us to ensure that the deeply disturbing facts about antisemitism at CUNY were brought forward in this hearing,” Lawfare Project litigation director Zipora Reich said in a press release. “While it is deeply frustrating to hear more platitudes and vague promises from CUNY’s leadership, we are encouraged to see federal lawmakers demanding accountability.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post ‘Fine Scholar’: UC Berkeley Chancellor Praises Professor Who Expressed Solidarity With Oct. 7 Attacks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Huckabee Calls for Israeli Investigation Into ‘Criminal and Terrorist’ Killing of Palestinian-American in West Bank

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee looks on during the day he visits the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem’s Old City, April 18, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee on Monday urged Israeli officials to swiftly investigate the killing of Saif Musallet, a 20-year-old American citizen who was allegedly beaten to death by Israeli settlers while he was visiting family in the West Bank town of Sinjil.

“There must be accountability for this criminal and terrorist act,” Huckabee wrote on social media, in what is one of his strongest condemnations of Israeli settler violence since he was appointed by President Donald Trump in November 2024. “Saif was just 20 yrs old.”

Musallet, a Florida native, was reportedly attacked on July 11 by a group of Israelis while accompanying relatives on family-owned farmland near Ramallah. His family says he was severely beaten and denied medical attention for nearly three hours before succumbing to his injuries. Another Palestinian man, 23-year-old Mohammad al-Shalabi, was shot and killed during the same incident, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry.

Israeli authorities said the violence followed an alleged rock-throwing incident that left two Israelis lightly wounded, a common occurrence in the West Bank which las left scores of Israelis civilians wounded and some killed. The Israel Defense Forces stated they used non-lethal crowd dispersal methods during the clash. The IDF says the incident is under investigation. Two Israeli minors were arrested following the attack, though according to Israeli media reports, neither of them is a murder suspect, and they were subsequently released to house arrest.

Musallet had traveled to the West Bank in early June to visit relatives and potentially meet a bride. Raised in Port Charlotte, Florida, he had recently co-founded an ice cream business in Tampa with his family. His death comes amid an escalation in settler-related violence across the West Bank, which has intensified since the October 2023 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel and the Israeli military’s ongoing campaign in Gaza.

Huckabee has historically defended Israeli settlement activity and has vowed to serve as an unwavering defender of the Jewish state.

Human rights groups and local activists say Musallet’s killing is part of a growing pattern of impunity for attacks on Palestinians, including American citizens. No Israeli suspects have been indicted in several high-profile deaths of Palestinian Americans in recent years, including journalist Shireen Abu Akleh and teenager Omar Mohammad Rabea.

U.S. lawmakers, including Representative Kathy Castor (D-FL), who represents Tampa, joined calls for an investigation. The State Department said it is aware of the incident and is providing consular support to the family but deferred further comment to Israeli authorities.

Musallet’s funeral was held Sunday in his family’s hometown of al-Mazra’a ash-Sharqiya. His relatives say they are demanding justice not only for Saif, but for all Americans caught in what they describe as an increasingly lawless situation in the occupied West Bank.

The post Huckabee Calls for Israeli Investigation Into ‘Criminal and Terrorist’ Killing of Palestinian-American in West Bank first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Scandal-Plagued UN Commission Disbands Amid Increasing US Pressure Against Anti-Israel International Organizations

Miloon Kothari, member of the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, briefs reporters on the first report of the Commission. UN Photo/Jean Marc Ferré

The Commission of Inquiry (COI), a controversial United Nations commission investigating Israel for nearly five years, has collapsed after all three of its members abruptly resigned days after the United States sanctioned a senior UN official over antisemitism.

Commission chair Navi Pillay resigned on July 8, citing health concerns and scheduling conflicts. Her fellow commissioners, Chris Sidoti and Miloon Kothari, followed suit days later. While none of the commissioners directly linked their resignations to the U.S. sanctions, the timing suggests mounting American pressure played a decisive role.

The resignations came just one day before the Trump administration announced sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Palestinian territories. Albanese was sanctioned over what the State Department called a “pattern of antisemitic and inflammatory rhetoric.” She had previously claimed that the U.S. was controlled by a “Jewish lobby” and questioned Israel’s right to self-defense. The sanctions bar her from entering the U.S. and freeze any assets under American jurisdiction.

The resignations mark a major victory for critics who have long viewed the inquiry as biased and politically motivated.

Watchdog groups, including Geneva-based UN Watch, celebrated the swift collapse of the Commission of Inquiry (COI), which they say had long operated with an open mandate to target Israel. “This is a watershed moment of accountability,” said UN Watch Executive Director Hillel Neuer. “The COI was built on bias and sustained by hatred. Its fall is a victory for human rights, not a defeat.”

The COI had faced heavy criticism since its formation in 2021. In July 2022, Commissioner Miloon Kothari,  made comments about the undue influence of a so-called “Jewish lobby” on the media, said the COI would “have to look at issues of settler colonialism.”

“Apartheid itself is a very useful paradigm, so we have a slightly different approach, but we will definitely get to it,” he added.

The Commission was established in 2021 year following the 11-day war between Israel and Gaza’s ruling Hamas group in May. COI is the first UN commission to ever be granted an indefinite period of investigation, which has drawn criticism from the US State Department, members of US Congress, and Jewish leaders across the world.

Following the resignations, Council President Jürg Lauber invited member states to nominate replacements by August 31. However, it is unclear whether the commission will be reconstituted or quietly shelved. UN Watch and other groups have urged the council to disband the COI entirely, calling it irreparably biased.

The post Scandal-Plagued UN Commission Disbands Amid Increasing US Pressure Against Anti-Israel International Organizations first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News