Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lambasted the top UN court for saying on Friday that Israel’s presence in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including its establishment of settlements in the territories, is illegal and violates international law.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) detailed its ruling in an advisory opinion, which is not legally binding.

“Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the regime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law,” President Nawaf Salam said while reading the findings of the 15-judge panel.

The ICJ urged Israel to evacuate settlements in the West Bank, pay reparations to Palestinians displaced by settlements, and stop the construction of new settlements. The court argued that Israel’s “occupation” has trampled on Palestinian “self-determination” and therefore must end.

Netanyahu rebuked the court’s opinion, arguing that Jews have a right to inhabit their historical homeland of Judea and Samaria in the West Bank.

“The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land, including in our eternal capital Jerusalem nor in Judea and Samaria, our historical homeland,” Netanyahu wrote on X/Twitter. “No absurd opinion in the Hague can deny this historical truth or the legal right of Israelis to live in their own communities in our ancestral home.”

While Netanyahu has long been a proponent of a Jewish presence in the West Bank, settlement construction intensified after the formation of the current right-wing Israeli government in 2022. Critics argue that the erection of West Bank settlements undermine the possibility of a Palestinian state. However, many proponents of settlements assert that Jews have a right to live in the Biblical lands of Judea and Samaria.

Israel has also ramped up construction of settlements in the months following Hamas’ Oct. 7 slaughter of over 1,200 people throughout southern Israel. In February, Israel approved plans to build over 3,300 new homes in the West Bank as a response to a fatal Palestinian shooting attack. Earlier this month, Israel reportedly approved 5,295 new housing units in the West Bank.

The ICJ case was set off by a December 2022 UN General Assembly resolution.

Opponents of Israel have been increasingly using the ICJ to pursue legal cases against the Jewish state. South Africa, for example, has accused Israel of committing “state-led genocide” in its defensive war against Hamas in Gaza. Israeli officials have strongly condemned the ICJ proceedings, noting that the Jewish state is targeting terrorists who use civilians as human shields in its military campaign.

Oren Marmorstein, spokesperson for Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that the Jewish state “rejects” the ICJ’s “one-sided” opinion issued on Friday.

“The opinion is completely detached from the reality of the Middle East: while Hamas, Iran, and other terrorist elements are attacking Israel from seven fronts — including from Gaza and Judea & Samaria — with the aim of obliterating it, and in the aftermath of the greatest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, the opinion ignores the atrocities that took place on October 7, as well as the security imperative of Israel to defend its territory and its citizens,” Marmorstein wrote.

Marmorstein added that the ICJ opinion “distances the possibility” of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and that the Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited self-governance in the West Bank, “is not interested in peace.”

“It should be emphasized that the opinion is blatantly one-sided. It ignores the past: the historical rights of the State of Israel and the Jewish people in the Land of Israel,” he said. “It is detached from the present: from the reality on the ground and the agreements between the parties. And it is dangerous for the future: it distances the parties from the only possible solution, which is direct negotiations.”

US Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) argued  that negotiations for a potential Palestinian state should commence after the conclusion of the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

“Today’s ruling by the so-called ‘International Court of Justice’ reaffirms that the UN discriminates against Israel. They have consistently denied Israel’s legitimate security needs and the right to defend her people,” Wasserman Schultz wrote.

“The discussion about the borders of a future Palestinian state should be part of a two-state solution negotiated by Israelis and Palestinians. However, no path forward exists until Hamas releases the hostages and lays down its arms, so that Israelis can live in a safe and secure environment free from another terrorist threat from Hamas,” Wasserman Schultz added.

The post Netanyahu Blasts ‘Absurd’ UN Court Ruling on Israeli Settlements: ‘Jews Can’t Be Occupiers in Own Land’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

The European Commission announced on Friday that it would provide 400 million euros ($435 million) in “short-term emergency financial support” to the ailing Palestinian Authority (PA) on the conditions that it address corruption, reduce unnecessary expenditures, and fix its educational curriculum, which has been widely condemned for promoting antisemitism and hatred of Israel.

The money will be disbursed in the form of grants and loans in three payments between July and September, the commission said in a statement, to address a Palestinian economic crisis which, some European officials fear, could lead to the collapse of the PA.

A “Letter of Intent” between the commission — the primary executive arm of the European Union (EU) — and the PA outlines the specifics of the funding and the agreed upon conditions needed to be met by the latter to secure the cash injection.

The conditions are aimed at “modernizing institutions, strengthening the rule of law, and reforming the social security system,” among other major reforms, according to the document.

The Letter of Intent mentions specific guidelines for the PA to adopt. To fight corruption, the EU is requiring the PA to enforce a mandatory retirement age for civil servants and to reduce government expenditures by 5 percent, among other measures.

It is unclear whether the EU’s demands to reduce government expenditures and reform the social security system will impact the PA’s so-called “pay for slay” program, which makes official payments to Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, the families of “martyrs” killed in attacks on Israelis, and injured Palestinian terrorists. The European Commission makes no mention of the nine-figure Palestinian fund, which critics argue is a financial reward for terrorism and reportedly comprises nearly 10 percent of the PA’s budget.

The emergency funding for the PA is not intended for rebuilding Gaza, according to the commission.

In order to receive the payments, the EU is also requiring the PA to modernize its education curriculum.

For years, studies by both nonprofits and governmental bodies have shown that Palestinian textbooks for schoolchildren promote antisemitic incitement and violence.

Last year, the European Parliament passed a resolution calling on the European Commission to suspend aid to the Palestinian Authority’s educational system until antisemitic and violent themes are removed from textbooks issued to K-12 students.

Although the EU has provided over 1.2 billion euros in external aid to the PA between 2021-2024, the PA faces an impending economic crisis as a result of financial corruption, mismanagement, and an economic shock related to the Israel-Hamas War. According to a recent report from the World Bank, the PA is operating at a $682 million deficit, which is expected to increase to $1.2 billion by the end of 2024. 

The EU makes clear in its conditions for the PA that it is unhappy with the current Palestinian government. One of the aid conditions, for instance, requires the activation of a “citizen’s complaint mechanism” and that the PA address complaints at the cabinet level.

The president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, hailed the cash infusion as an important step toward a two-state solution to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict after the Israel-Hamas War in Gaza concludes.

“Israelis, Palestinians, and the entire region deserve peace, security, and stability … With this joint strategy, we are supporting the Palestinian Authority’s reform efforts,” she said in a statement. “Together, we are laying the groundwork for economic and political stability in the West Bank.”

Mahmoud Abbas, the aging president of the PA, has refused to hold elections since taking power in 2005 and has repeatedly been accused of corruption and embezzlement.

The commission’s announcement came one day after Israeli’s parliament, known as the Knesset, on Thursday easily approved a motion to reject Palestinian statehood west of the Jordan River.

The American Jewish Committee (AJC) applauded the EU’s decision to attach conditions to PA funding.

“We welcome today’s significant announcement by the EU to, for the first time, tie all funding to the Palestinian Authority on its ‘progress towards the agreed-upon reform milestones,’” the group wrote on X/Twitter. “Urgent reforms include stopping salaries to terrorists and ending antisemitic incitement in PA textbooks.”

The post EU Pledges $435 Million to Ailing Palestinian Authority — With Conditions for Reform first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Three Northwestern University faculty members and one graduate student have been charged with misdemeanors for interfering with law enforcement’s efforts to clear an unlawful pro-Hamas demonstration which took place on the Deering Meadow section of campus during the final days of spring semester, The Daily Northwestern reported earlier this week.

The individuals were charged by the Northwestern University Police Department, which said that they allegedly engaged in “obstructing a police officer during the protests,” a crime for which they could, if convicted, spend a year in jail and pay a $2,500 fine, The Daily Northwestern said. They have already appeared before a judge and will do so again in August.

“While the university permits peaceful demonstrations, it does not permit activity that disrupts university operations, violates the law, or includes the intimidation or harassment of members of the community,” Northwestern University spokesperson Jon Yates said in a statement shared with the paper.

Northwestern University has struggled recently to correct an impression that it coddled pro-Hamas protesters and acceded to their demands for a boycott of Israel in exchange for an end to their protest, which included their setting up a “Gaza Solidarity Camp” — a cluster of tents in which the students lived and from which they refused to leave unless their conditions were met.

Northwestern president Michael Schill denied during a congressional hearing held in May that he made any concessions. As part of the deal to end the encampment, he agreed to establish a scholarship for Palestinian undergraduates, contact potential employers of students who caused recent campus disruptions to insist on their being hired, create a segregated dormitory hall that will be occupied exclusively by Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) and Muslim students, and form a new advisory committee in which anti-Zionists students and faculty may wield an outsized voice.

“It’s striking that you decided to negotiate a sweetheart deal with pro-Hamas students and professors who denied Oct. 7, either denied it, celebrated, or simply don’t care. I look at that as pure evil,” US Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT) told Schill during the hearing, which was titled “Calling for Accountability: Stopping Antisemitic College Chaos.”

Following Schill’s testimony, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) called for his resignation, noting that he confessed to appointing accused antisemites to a task force on antisemitism that ultimately disbanded after its members could not agree on a definition of antisemitism.

The Northwestern University protesters are not the only ones facing consequences for alleged actions taken during the “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” demonstration, which exploded on college campuses across the country.

The University of Florida (UF) handed down severe and potentially life-altering punishments to seven pro-Hamas rioters earlier this month, going over the heads of a school disciplinary body that was set on slapping their wrists and sentencing most to probation. The individuals were issued full suspensions for as many as four years.

The suspensions may not be the only punishments that the students will face.

According to Fresh Take Florida, the students were part of a group of nine that were arrested by local law enforcement for trespassing and resisting arrest, charges that are being prosecuted by the Alachua County State Attorney’s Office. They are taking their chances at trial, the news service added, noting that all nine have rejected “deferred prosecution,” an agreement that would require them to plead guilty, or no contest, in exchange for the state’s expunging the convictions from their records in the future so long as they abstain from committing more criminal acts.

One of the nine, computer science student Parker Stanely Hovis, 26, — who was suspended for three years — has proclaimed that they will contest the state’s cases.

“We did not resist arrest, and we are prepared to fight our charges,” Hovis said in a statement. “We’re standing in solidarity with each other, and collectively demanding that the state drop the charges against us.”

The University of Texas at Austin has also meted out lengthy suspensions to pro-Hamas protesters who violated school rules.

Three students have been sentenced to deferred suspensions, a form of probation which allows them to continue their studies so long as they comply with school rules going forward, according KUT News, a National Public Radio (NPR) affiliate. As part of their punishment, they must pass an exam testing their knowledge of school policies on free speech and protests and formally declare their awareness of the harsher, full suspensions they will receive should they violate school rules again.

One student, KUT added, was given a “full” two-year suspension during which he is banned from campus. The suspension effectively disenrolled him from the university, but he can reapply for readmission in 2026.

“The University of Texas at Austin provided a world-class learning environment where every student can thrive,” said a letter, as quoted by the outlet, sent to one of the students who was placed on deferred suspension. “At this juncture, suspension appears to be the appropriate consequences for these serious infractions.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post Northwestern University Police Charge Four Individuals for Role in Pro-Hamas Demonstration first appeared on Algemeiner.com.