Connect with us

Uncategorized

Did Popular NPR Podcast Break Its Own Journalistic Standards with Anti-Israel Episode?

Jewish Americans and supporters of Israel gather at the National Mall in Washington, DC on Nov. 14, 2023 for the “March for Israel” rally. Photo: Dion J. Pierre/The Algemeiner

On October 15, 2025, NPR’s popular Code Switch podcast aired a 45-minute program entitled, “What does Israel mean to American Jews?”

But anyone hoping to gain an insight into how different parts of the American Jewish community feel about the Jewish State, would have been left sorely disappointed.

Because, contrary to how it was presented, this was not a look at the relationship between American Jews and Israel, from staunch Zionists to anti-Zionists.

Rather, it was an invitation to platform fringe voices within the Jewish community that are either highly critical of Israeli actions or oppose the existence of the Jewish State altogether.

It should be noted that much of the content was lifted verbatim from an April 2024 Code Switch episode that was aptly titled “As American Jews speak out on Israel, some see rifts in their communities.” Unlike this most recent episode, its 2024 predecessor did not purport to provide its audience with a general understanding of the relationship between American Jewry and the State of Israel.

The tone of this latest piece is set early on by one of the podcast’s hosts, Leah Donnella, who tells her co-host that, in the days following October 7, all of her interviewees were “devastated” by what Israel was doing in Gaza and that they all felt somewhat “implicated” in it.

This is truly astonishing. That the response to October 7 (which, by the way, is mentioned but never explained as a large-scale massacre of Israelis by a Palestinian terror group) by all of Donnella’s interviewees was to entrench their criticism of Israel signifies how fringe their voices are within the wider American Jewish community. Because the feelings of the vast majority of the American Jewish community in the immediate aftermath of October 7 were characterized by “horror, shock, and disbelief.”

Aside from the fringe Jewish American voices that are platformed by NPR during the first part of this podcast episode, the second half is largely dedicated to an interview with Marjorie Feld, a university professor who recently wrote a book on the history of the anti-Zionist movement within the American Jewish community.

Feld’s inclusion in this episode is meant to provide an academic context to the anti-Israel positions put forward by those who were interviewed in its first half.

However, while host Leah Donnella does mention in passing that Feld is “openly critical of Israel,” she never informs her audience that Feld, appearing as an impartial academic with an expertise in the topic, is actually an anti-Zionist activist and serves on the Academic Advisory Council of Jewish Voice for Peace, a virulently anti-Israel organization.

This failure to inform is a breach of basic journalistic standards of transparency and impartiality.

Feld’s anti-Israel partisanship would also explain why her academic contextualization fails to mention the 2,000-year connection between Jews in the Diaspora (including the United States) and the Land of Israel, erasing those historic ties while promoting Palestinian Arabs as the land’s “native” population.

These were not the only journalistic standards that were breached by this latest Code Switch episode. By only profiling those on the fringes of the Jewish community who are extremely critical of Israel, its actions, and Zionism in general, this episode not only failed to live up to its title, but it also completely failed to provide a proper and accurate answer to the question it posited.

NPR has not only breached general journalistic principles, but it has also violated some of the very standards that NPR professes to abide by. These include accuracy, fairness, and completeness. None of the opinions put forward by any of the interviewees were “rigorously challenged,” no opposing viewpoints were presented, and the story of American Jewry and Israel was not told “comprehensively.”

If the hosts of Code Switch wanted to present an honest picture of how American Jews feel about Israel, they could have referenced several surveys that have been published throughout the two years of war. Even while some American Jews have become more critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza, the majority of the Jewish community still feel an emotional connection to Israel. This positive feeling toward the Jewish State and concern for its future becomes even more pronounced the more one is involved in the Jewish community.

This breach of standards when it comes to reporting on Israel is nothing new for NPR. From the first days of the Israel-Hamas war in 2023, HonestReporting has continually exposed bias and misinformation within NPR’s coverage.

It’s no secret that NPR is in financial difficulties. Why should anyone contribute to a media organization that tosses its own journalistic principles into the wind over Israel, continuously providing a disservice to its loyal listeners and readers?

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Lebanon Plans UN Complaint Against Israel Over Border Wall

A UN vehicle drives near a concrete wall along Lebanon’s southern border which, according to the Lebanese presidency, extends beyond the “Blue Line”, a U.N.-mapped line separating Lebanon from Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, as seen from northern Israel, November 16, 2025. REUTERS/Shir Torem

Lebanon will file a complaint to the U.N. Security Council against Israel for constructing a concrete wall along Lebanon’s southern border that extends beyond the “Blue Line,” the Lebanese presidency said on Saturday.

The Blue Line is a U.N.-mapped line separating Lebanon from Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Israeli forces withdrew to the Blue Line when they left south Lebanon in 2000.

A spokesperson for the U.N. secretary-general, Stephane Dujarric, said on Friday the wall has made more than 4,000 square meters (nearly an acre) of Lebanese territory inaccessible to the local population.

The Lebanese presidency echoed his remarks, saying in a statement that Israel’s ongoing construction constituted “a violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 and an infringement on Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Dujarric said the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) had requested that the wall be removed.

An Israeli military spokesperson denied on Friday that the wall crossed the Blue Line.

“The wall is part of a broader IDF plan whose construction began in 2022,” the spokesperson said, referring to the Israel Defense Forces.

“Since the start of the war, and as part of lessons learned from it, the IDF has been advancing a series of measures, including reinforcing the physical barrier along the northern border.”

UNIFIL, established in 1978, operates between the Litani River in the north and the Blue Line in the south. The mission has more than 10,000 troops from 50 countries and about 800 civilian staff, according to its website.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Iran Says US Is Not Ready for ‘Equal and Fair’ Nuclear Talks

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi speaks during a meeting with foreign ambassadors in Tehran, Iran, July 12, 2025. Photo: Hamid Forootan/Iranian Foreign Ministry/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS

Washington’s current approach toward Tehran does not indicate any readiness for “equal and fair negotiations,” Iran’s foreign minister said on Sunday, after US President Donald Trump hinted last week at potential discussions.

Following Israel’s attack on Iran in June, which was joined by U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, attempts at renewing dialogue on Tehran’s nuclear program have failed.

The United States, its European allies and Israel accuse Tehran of using its nuclear program as a veil for efforts to develop the capability to produce weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.

Tehran and Washington underwent five rounds of indirect nuclear talks prior to the 12-days-war, but faced obstacles such as the issue of domestic uranium enrichment, which the U.S. wants Iran to forego.

“The U.S. cannot expect to gain what it couldn’t in war through negotiations,” Abbas Araqchi said during a Tehran conference named “international law under assault.”

“Iran will always be prepared to engage in diplomacy, but not negotiations meant for dictation,” he added.

During the same conference, deputy foreign minister Saeed Khatibzadeh accused Washington of pursuing its wartime goals with “negotiations as a show.”

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Israeli Government Decides ‘Independent’ Commission to Investigate Oct. 7 Failures

The Israeli Supreme Court in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

i24 NewsThe Israeli government has approved the creation of an “independent” commission of inquiry to examine the failures that enabled the Hamas assault of October 7, 2023.

However, in a move sharply criticized by the opposition and contrary to the recommendation of the Supreme Court, the panel will not be a formal state commission of inquiry. Instead, its mandate, authorities, and scope will be determined directly by government ministers.

According to the decision, the commission will receive full investigative powers and must be composed in a way that ensures “the broadest possible public trust.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will form a special ministerial committee tasked with defining what the inquiry may investigate, the time periods to be reviewed, and the authority it will receive. The committee has 45 days to deliver its recommendations.

For the past year, the government has repeatedly resisted calls to establish a state commission, arguing at first that such a body could not operate during wartime. Later, some ministers accused Supreme Court President Isaac Amit of being incapable of appointing an impartial chairperson.

But on October 15, the High Court of Justice ruled that there was “no substantive argument” against forming a state commission, giving the government 30 days to respond.

Netanyahu maintains that responsibility for the October 7 failures lies primarily with Israel’s security agencies rather than with political leaders.

His critics accuse him of creating a weaker, government-controlled inquiry designed to limit scrutiny of his decisions, undermining the prospect of full accountability for the deadliest attack in Israel’s history.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News