Uncategorized
In an unusual alliance, Jewish media and striking journalists are uniting to cover the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting trial
PITTSBURGH (JTA) — How many times should an alleged synagogue shooter’s name be mentioned in a news story about his trial, now beginning after more than four years?
For the Pittsburgh Union Press last month, the answer was seven. For the Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle, it was an uneasy five, in a departure from its usual answer of zero — a number chosen out of deference to a community devastated by the shooting.
The slight difference was the only discrepancy between one set of stories published by the two news organizations covering the trial of Robert Bowers, accused of murdering 11 Jews in their synagogue here in 2018.
The anomaly offers a window into an unusual partnership between the two publications — the city’s Jewish paper and the news site established by striking staffers for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette — born in February when it became clear that the trial would last months.
Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle editor Toby Tabachnick was dreading the trial coverage, with a staff of just three on the editorial side: herself and two reporters, David Rullo and Adam Reinherz.
“I started getting really nervous. Like, how are we going to do this?” Tabachnick said on the eve of the trial, speaking at the federal courthouse where jury selection would soon begin. “Our regular reporters could have been here. But it would have been extremely taxing, difficult and emotional for us, because we’re so ingrained in the community too.”
Plus, she added, “In addition to this trial, which is going to be every day for three months, we’re covering the synagogues, events and the holidays, the lectures, we still have a regular community newspaper to put out.”
Tabachnick knew Andrew “Goldy” Goldstein, one of the Post-Gazette’s team that picked up a Pulitzer for their coverage of the massacre, from his time as a Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle intern. She also knew he was on strike and wondered whether he could use the extra freelance opportunity.
Instead, Goldstein immediately offered up a better idea: Join with the Pittsburgh Union Progress, the strike paper, in a joint reporting project, organized in part through the Pittsburgh Media Partnership, an incubator for local journalism. (The Jewish Telegraphic Agency is raising funds for the coverage.)
Working together just made sense, Goldstein said. The Chronicle was deeply resourced and credible in the Jewish community, and the Progress had on board Torsten Ove, a local legend.
From left to right, Bob Batz of the Pittsburgh Union Progress, Toby Tabachnick of the Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle and Andrew Goldstein of the Progress pose in the Joseph Weis Jr. Courthouse in Pittsburgh, April 21, 2023. (Ron Kampeas)
“We have the all-star federal courts reporter in Torsten and we have a lot of really great journalists who love Pittsburgh, love this community, and we’ll do our best to cover it,” Goldstein said, noting that the Chronicle would also have access to the Progress’s photographers. “But the Chronicle brings something different entirely to the table, which is, they’re so deeply sourced in the Pittsburgh Jewish community, and they have such an interest in this trial in particular.”
Newsroom collaborations have become more frequent in recent years as publications realize they can expand their impact and audience by working together. But while there are a growing number of relationships between local and national publications and between daily and investigative outlets, ties between mainstream newsrooms and community or ethnic media are less common.
S. Mitra Kalita, the founder and director of URL Media, a network of Black and Brown community news outlets that share content and revenue, said the value in such partnerships was not just in delivering relief as media staffs shrink, but also in sensitizing mainstream media to minority sensibilities.
“Talking about who [the ethnic media outlet is] serving and why we’re doing it this way — the spirit of real collaboration is a bit of that give and take,” she said. “We make mainstream media way better because it starts to infuse mainstream media with aspects of community and thus redefine the mainstream.”
The residual trauma of the massacre in the Pittsburgh collaboration made it all the more important for the mainstream reporters to be sensitive to the nuances that the Jewish media was bringing, she said.
“Especially a story like this one, which was such an attack on a community — a community that was singled out for their sheer existence, the strategy cannot be ‘let’s just work in parallel,” Kalita said. “It’s not going to work. It has to be kind of a cross-pollination and a real collaboration.”
That’s exactly what is happening, according to the reporters and editors involved in the project, with communication easy between each publication’s editor and expertise flowing in both directions.
Ove a denizen of the Joseph F. Weis Jr. Courthouse for so long that he can tell stories about a sizable stretch of the portraits of judges that line its corridor walls; he may be the only court reporter to seek an interview with a judge after his death, to ask him why he was haunting the place. (The judge never showed, but his widow was less than surprised to hear that he was still working.)
He led a passel of Chronicle and Progress staffers through the warren-like courthouse on the Friday before the trial, handily impressing them with his intimacy with the building — he knew the provenance of the paintings in each courtroom — and its staff. Soo Song, the assistant U.S. attorney who is leading the prosecution team, smiled and nodded as she passed.
Torsten Ove, left, of the Pittsburgh Union Progress and Adam Reinherz of the PIttsburgh Jewish Chronicle confer on the first day of jury selection for the Pittsburgh synagogue massacre trial, April 24, 2023. (Toby Tabachnick)
Ove showed the reporters how to access court records for free, and while they stood around him at one of the computer terminals, the teams’ different emphases emerged: Ove predicted that jury selection, which started last week and is expected to last as long as three weeks, would not be a news generator, because in his experience, it rarely has been.
Reinherz and Tabachnick, attuned to reporting on faith communities, were not so sure: Reinherz wondered whether believing Catholics, who reject the death penalty, would be eliminated, and Tabachnick wondered whether defense attorneys would seek to keep Jews off the jury — and how they would go about doing that.
Reinherz ended up covering the first day of jury selection. “Local and national reporters decided the Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle should have one seat during the initial session of day one,” Reinherz explained in a story that appeared on both news sites. He noted that the first member of the public to enter the courtroom was Daniel Leger, one of two survivors of the attack.
Working together across platforms was odd, said Bob Batz Jr., the Progress’s interim editor, but he could get used to it.
“This is uncharted territory for someone like me, and I’ve been doing this for a long time, and we don’t, you know, we don’t collaborate,” he said.
“We compete!” Tabachnick interjected.
“What we’re doing is not common, and it’s not going to be easy,” Batz said. “Surely, we’re going to tick each other off about something or somebody is going to put the wrong word in or there’s a million things that can go wrong, but the breaking of ground where you’re actually working together, it just makes sense in so many ways on this story. We’re really trying to serve the community.”
Tabachnick said she saw added value in keeping journalists she admired in the limelight while they are on strike. Journalists at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette went on strike back in October over wages and working conditions, in a crescendo of mounting tensions between the paper’s longtime owners and the staff that contributed to a newsroom exodus even in 2018, when the paper won a Pulitzer for its synagogue shooting coverage. The strike is now one of the longest in journalism history, and the staffers contributing to the Pittsburgh Union Progress are doing so despite earning well below than their regular salaries.
“I feel good about getting their names, their publication’s name out,” Tabachnick said.
Each story is running in essentially identical form on both publications’ websites, with a line crediting their collaboration. Tabachnick and Batz had a brief and friendly email exchange before each clicked “publish” on their story about debate among victims’ families about the appropriateness of the death penalty.
The Chronicle is minimizing appearances of the name of the accused killer, out of sensitivity to readers who may want to see their community members centered rather than their aggressor. Some researchers and law enforcement officials have also called on journalists not to print mass shooters’ names and photographs, citing evidence that doing so may contribute to their glorification and even copycat crimes.
Batz says he totally gets the Chronicle’s thinking, despite making a different choice in his newsroom.
“We’re still feeling our way, we’re still figuring this out,” Batz said. “They don’t name the defendant in their story, and they haven’t. And our guy Torsten who’s an all-star courts reporter, he’s going to use the guy’s name. And then in real time going back and forth on email and text we came up with his solution and that story was on both websites in minutes and it was really kind of cool.”
Tabachnick picked up the account of the previous night’s collaboration as if she’d been working across a desk from Batz for decades instead of online since February.
“The solution was that I realized that with the trial starting, it really didn’t make sense not to use his name at all anymore that we really needed to as a news organization,” she said. “But that didn’t mean we had to overuse his name. And I’m not saying Torsten overused his name. He used it as much as he needed to use it in terms of style, but I took out a few of them and replaced it with ‘the defendant’ and we were all happy.”
—
The post In an unusual alliance, Jewish media and striking journalists are uniting to cover the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting trial appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
A ‘Yiddish Vokh’ for nerds — but without the families
דעם 9טן ביזן 16טן פֿעברואַר איז אין קלויזנבורג, רומעניע פֿאָרגעקומען די ערשטע אינטענסיווע ייִדישע ווינטער־פּראָגראַם געווידמעט דער טעמע ייִדיש אין געוועזענעם מיזרח־בלאָק, ד״ה אין ראַטן־פֿאַרבאַנד, פּוילן, און רומעניע אין דער קאָמוניסטישער תּקופֿה. אַן אינטענסיווע ייִדיש־פּראָגראַם מיט אַזאַ טעמע, וווּ מע לערנט סאָוועטיש ייִדיש און אָרטאָגראַפֿיע, איז נאָך קיין מאָל נישט געווען, אויף וויפֿל איך ווייס — לכל־הפּחות נישט זײַט דער ראַטן־פֿאַרבאַנד האָט צוגעמאַכט דאָס געשעפֿט אין 1991.
איבער 70 ייִדישיסטן, ייִדיש־פֿאָרשערס און אַוואַנסירטע סטודענטן האָבן זיך פֿאַרזאַמלט אויפֿן קאַמפּוס פֿון באַבש־באָלײַ־אוניווערסיטעט, וואָס איז דער גרעסטער אין רומעניע און דער איינציקער, וווּ מע לערנט ייִדיש. די פּראָגראַם איז באַשטאַנען פֿון לעקציעס, וואַרשטאַטן, קאָנצערטן, וויזיטן אין מוזייען און בתּי־כּנסיות, אַ נסיעה קיין סאַטמאַר און שאַמלוי, ווי אויך אַן אַקאַדעמישע קאָנפֿערענץ מיט 12 רעפֿעראַטן — אַלץ אין גאַנצן אויף ייִדיש.
מע קען זאָגן, אַז די אונטערנעמונג איז געווען אַ מין „ייִדיש־וואָך“ פֿאַר נערדס — אָבער אָן די משפּחות.
די באַטייליקטע זענען געקומען פֿון אַ סך אייראָפּעיִשע לענדער, צפֿון־אַמעריקע און ישׂראל. דער פּוילישער קאָנטינגענט איז געווען ספּעציעל אָנזעעוודיק (כּן ירבו!). איך האָב באַמערקט, אַז אַפֿילו צווישן די אַמעריקאַנער און ישׂראלים האָבן אַ סך מענטשן געהאַט אַ „סאָוועטישן“ הינטערגרונט, ווײַל זייערע טאַטע־מאַמע זענען געקומען פֿון דאָרט. אין אַ געוויסער מאָס איז די פּראָגראַם געווען אַ סאָרט צוזאַמענטרעף פֿון לאַנדסלײַט.
ווי אַזוי האָט מען צוגעצויגן איבער 70 ייִדישיסטן קיין קלויזנבורג, רומעניע? קודם־כּל, איז די פּראָגראַם געווען כּמעט בחינם. מע האָט באַצאָלט בלויז $10 אַ האָטעל־צימער און זייער ווייניק פֿאַר אַן עקסקורסיע און אַנדערע קלייניקייטן, אָבער בעצם איז עס געווען פֿרײַ, אַ דאַנק די צוויי אוניווערסיטעטן, וואָס האָבן אָרגאַניזירט די פּראָגראַם בשותּפֿות: בר־אילן אוניווערסיטעט אין ישׂראל און באַבש־באָלײַ־אוניווערסיטעט אין רומעניע.
זיי האָבן, למשל, געדעקט כּמעט אַלע הוצאָות און באַזאָרגט די באַטייליקטע מיט קאַווע און כּיבוד אין די הפֿסקות. בכלל קאָסט דאָס לעבן אין רומעניע ווייניקער ווי אין מערבֿ־אייראָפּע אָדער אין ישׂראל. האָבן די אָנטייל־נעמער געלעבט אַזוי ווי אינעם באַקאַנטן ליד „רומעניע“ פֿון אַהרן לעבעדעוו: „פֿון קיין דאגות ווייסט מען ניט…“
דעם פּלאַן פֿאַר דער בשותּפֿותדיקער פּראָגראַם האָט בער קאָטלערמאַן אויסגעאַרבעט צוזאַמען מיט אַוגוסטאַ קאָסטיוק ראַדאָסטאַוו. געהאָלפֿן אָרגאַניזירן האָבן אויך ענת אַדרת און חנה גינזבורג־פּאַלעי, ווי אויך פֿיליפּ שוואַרץ. אין דער פּראָגראַם האָבן אויך געלערנט דאַשאַ וואַכרושאָוואַ, מיכאל לוקין, סאַשאַ פּאָליאַן, קאַראָלינע שימאַניאַק און אַני הקטן.
ס׳איז געווען צו באַוווּנדערן, אַז די גאַנצע פּראָגראַם איז פֿאָרגעקומען אין גאַנצן אויף ייִדיש, אַפֿילו לעקציעס וועגן שווערע ליטעראַרישע און היסטאָרישע טעמעס. דאָס איז בלויז געווען מעגלעך דערפֿאַר, ווײַל די פּראָגראַם איז געווען געצילט, דער עיקר, אויף אַוואַנסירטע ייִדיש־קענערס. מע האָט אויך אַרײַנגענומען מיטעלע סטודענטן, אָבער נישט קיין אָנהייבערס. דאָס האָט אַלעמען באַפֿרײַט פֿון דער געוויינטלעכער טירחה פֿון באַפֿרידיקן די אָנהייבערס מיט ענגליש־שפּראַכיקע לעקציעס, אונטערנעמונגען, און דערקלערונגען. מע האָט יאָ פֿון צײַט צו צײַט געהערט גוייִשע שפּראַכן, ווי למשל ווען מענטשן פֿון דעם זעלבן לאַנד האָבן גערעדט צווישן זיך. אָבער בדרך־כּלל האָבן אַלע פּראָבירט צו רעדן בלויז ייִדיש.
פֿון די 1920ער ביז די 1940ער יאָרן האָבן ייִדישע קאָמוניסטן געשאַפֿן אַ וויכטיקן חלק פֿון דער ייִדישער קולטור און ליטעראַטור. אַ סך פֿון די בעסטע ייִדישע שרײַבערס זענען געווען קאָמוניסטן, אָדער האָבן לכל־הפּחות סימפּאַטיזירט מיט זיי און געשריבן פֿאַר „לינקע“ פּובליקאַציעס. עס איז אַן אומיושר, וואָס דער הײַנטיקער עולם פֿאַרקוקט די קינסטלערישע אויפֿטוען פֿון די קאָמוניסטן בלויז דערפֿאַר וואָס זיי זענען געווען שטאַרק נאַיִוו און זענען אַרײַנגעפֿאַלן אין אַ פּאַסטקע. די טראַגעדיע פֿונעם 12טן אויגוסט 1952, ווען דער רעזשים האָט דערמאָרדעט וויכטיקע סאָוועטשע שרײַבערס און קולטור־טוערס, האָט געוואָרפֿן אַ שאָטן אויף דער גאַנצער תּקופֿה — אָבער די ייִדישע שרײַבער האָבן דאָס נישט פֿאַרדינט.
איין פּראָבלעם מיט דער קאָנפֿערענץ איז געווען וואָס געוויסע אַקאַדעמישע לעקציעס האָבן געדויערט 90 מינוט. דאָס איז געווען ניט גרינג אַפֿילו פֿאַר אַוואַנסירטע סטודענטן. צוריקגערעדט, וואָס איז דאָ ייִדיש ערגער פון אַנדערע שפּראַכן, אויף וועלכע מע האַלט אַקאַדעמישע לעקציעס?
אַ טשיקאַווער צוגאָב צו דער פּראָגראַם איז געווען אַ קורצער פֿילם אויף ייִדיש געשאַפֿן פֿון עטל ניבאָרסקי, פֿאַרבונדן מיט די סאָוועטיש־ייִדישע שרײַבערס. עס איז אַ שיין ראָמאַנטיש בילד — אָבער איך וויל נישט אויסזאָגן קיין סודות, ווײַל יעדער איינער דאַרף זען דעם פֿילם פֿאַר זיך אַליין.
בײַ די מערסטע באַטייליקטע איז דאָס געווען דאָס ערשטע מאָל וואָס זיי זענען געקומען קיין קלויזנבורג. זי איז אַ שיינע אַלטע שטאָט מיט אַ סך פּרעכטיקע גאַסן און הײַזער פֿון די עסטרײַך־אונגערישע צײַטן. ס׳איז די צווייט־גרעסטע שטאָט אין רומעניע און האָט אַ סך גוטע רעסטאָראַנען און קאַווע־הײַזער, וווּ מע קען פֿאַרברענגען די איבעריקע שעהען.
כאָטש רומעניע האָט פֿאַר דער צווייטער וועלט־מלחמה זיך נישט גערעכנט פֿאַר קיין גרויסן ייִדיש־צענטער, זעען מיר הײַנט אײַן, אַז זי האָט געהאַט אַ חשובֿ אָרט. ערשטנס, האָבן מער ייִדן איבערגעלעבט די מלחמה אין רומעניע ווי אין פּוילן, ליטע אָדער אונגערן, ווײַל רומעניע האָט נישט דעפּאָרטירט אירע ייִדן קיין אוישוויץ. (אין קלויזנבורג האָט מען זיי יאָ דעפּאָרטירט, ווײַל די שטאָט האָט ווידער געהערט צו אונגערן צווישן 1940 און 1944.)
אַ סך ייִדן איבער דער וועלט שטאַמען פֿון רומעניע, אַרײַנגערעכנט באַקאַנטע חסידישע הויפֿן, ווי סאַטמאַר, וויזשניץ, קלויזנבורג, סקולען, ספּינקע און קרעטשניף. אַ טייל פֿון די חסידים האַלטן זיך פֿאַר „אונגערישע“ ווײַל אַ מאָל איז דאָס געווען אונגערן, אָבער לויט דער הײַנטיקער מאַפּע זענען זיי רומענישע. דער אונטערלענדישער דיאַלעקט, וואָס מע האָט גערעדט אין מערבֿ־רומעניע, איז דער יסוד פֿונעם חסידישן ייִדיש וואָס מע רעדט הײַנט.
דעם פֿאַרלעצטן טאָג האָט מען געמאַכט אַן עקסקורסיע קיין סאַטמאַר (Satu Mare), וואָס געפֿינט זיך נאָענט צו דער אונגערישער גרענעץ. איין באַטייליקטער, אַסף קירשנער, האָט באַמערקט: „דער בעסטער אופֿן זיך אויסצולערנען ייִדיש איז צו זיצן דרײַ שעה אין אַן אויטאָבוס קיין סאַטמאַר צוזאַמען מיט ייִדישיסטן, וואָס הערן נישט אויף צו רעדן.“ אין דער גרויסער שול פֿון סאַטמאַר האָבן מיר באַגעגנט אַ גרופּע סאַטמאַרער חסידים, געקומענע פֿון לאָנדאָן, וואָס האָבן געהאַלטן אין דאַווענען שחרית. פֿאַר די חסידים איז געווען אַ חידוש צו זען אַ גרופּע פֿון זיבעציק מענטשן, מענער און פֿרויען אָנגעטאָן ווי גויים, וואָס רעדן אַלע ייִדיש.
די איינציקע צרה איז געווען אַן ענין מיט דער באַהייצונג. דער עולם האָט געהערט עטלעכע לעקציעס אינעם אָרטיקן בית־מדרש, וואָס איז נישט געווען באַהייצט. האָבן אַלע שוין געטראָגן די מאַנטלען די גאַנצע צײַט.
מיר האָבן געזען די שטאָט סאַטמאַר מערסטנס דורכן פֿענצטער פֿון אויטאָבוס, ווײַל עס האָט די גאַנצע צײַט גערעגנט. אָבער דאָס באַגעגעניש מיט די סאַטמאַרער חסידים האָט זייער שיין אילוסטרירט אונדזער פּראָגראַם: אַ וואָך אין דער סאָוועטיש־ייִדישער אוטאָפּיע. (דאָס איז סײַ איראָניש געמיינט, סײַ נישט איראָניש.)
„דאָס איז געװען אַן אויסערגעװיינטלעכע אָקאַזיע צו פֿאַרברענגען מיט מענטשן פֿון דער גאָרער ייִדישער װעלט,“ האָט אַ באַטייליקטער, בנימין לערמאַן, פֿון בערקלי, קאַליפֿאָרניע, צוזאַמען מיט זײַן ברודער, עריק, מיר געשריבן אין אַ בליצבריוו. „כאָטש איך בין נישט קיין אַקאַדעמיקער און האָב פֿריִער נישט געהאַט קיין ספּעציעלן אינטערעס צו סאָװעטישע ענינים, איז דער אינהאַלט געװען אינטערעסאַנט און האָט אין מיר אָנגעצונדן אַ חשק װײַטער צו לייענען די סאָװעטישע שרײַבער.“
„מע האָט זיך אױפֿגעכאַפּט מיט ייִדיש, זיך געלייגט שלאָפֿן מיט ייִדיש, אַפֿילו געחלומט אױף ייִדיש,“ האָט געזאָגט אַ צווייטער באַטייליקטער, טאָמעק מײַטשאַק, פֿון וואַדאָוויצע, פּוילן. און תּפֿארת פֿרומקין, פֿון ירושלים, האָט אַפֿילו געזאָגט, אַז אויף דער פּראָגראַם איז זי געווען אַזוי אײַנגעטונקען אין ייִדיש, אַז נאָך דעם, אויפֿן פֿליפֿעלד, האָבן אַלע פֿרעמדע שפּראַכן איר געקלונגען ווי ייִדיש.
The post A ‘Yiddish Vokh’ for nerds — but without the families appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Trump’s Board of Peace convenes on Gaza as prospect of U.S. war with Iran surges
(JTA) — The Board of Peace convened by President Donald Trump to administer Gaza’s reconstruction is meeting for the first time in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.
At the same time, signs are mounting that Trump could launch a long-threatened war on Iran imminently, which would throw the Middle East back into turmoil. U.S. warships are amassing in the region, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu canceled a planned trip to the United States this week and Trump met Wednesday with his top Iran advisors.
Trump surprised Israel by opening direct negotiations with Iran last year to limit its nuclear program. The ongoing talks, including this week, have reportedly left a wide gap in the two sides’ positions.
“There are many arguments one can make in favor of a strike against Iran,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Wednesday while maintaining that Trump would still like to make a deal.
Israeli media is reporting that a war could begin as soon as this weekend; Axios is reporting that U.S. officials view the end of the month as a significant deadline before making a final decision.
Iranian officials have said they would consider all Israeli and U.S. positions as legitimate targets as they respond to any U.S. attack, meaning that Israelis could soon find themselves once again racing to bomb shelters with Iranian missiles incoming.
Unlike after last year’s U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear sites that brought to an end a 10-day war between Israel and Iran, any U.S. campaign against Iran now could last months, according to reports.
Trump and Vice President JD Vance are scheduled to address the Board of Peace directly. Netanyahu joined the board only reluctantly, citing misgivings about sharing membership with Qatari and Turkish leaders who have supported Hamas in Gaza.
The post Trump’s Board of Peace convenes on Gaza as prospect of U.S. war with Iran surges appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Tucker Carlson draws scorn for claiming he was ‘detained’ at Israeli airport after Mike Huckabee interview
(JTA) — Tucker Carlson had just barely wrapped his interview with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee before the two were already disagreeing on a basic fact.
Carlson, the influential conservative commentator, flew to Tel Aviv on Wednesday to conduct the interview with Huckabee at Ben Gurion Airport, departing hours later without leaving the airport. But before leaving, he told the British tabloid Daily Mail, Israeli authorities confiscated his passport, dragged his executive producer into an interrogation room “and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about.’
Not so, says the ambassador: What Carlson’s team experienced was simply a routine security measure.
“EVERYONE who comes in/out of Israel (every country for that matter) has passports checked & routinely asked security questions,” Huckabee wrote on X, refuting his former Fox News colleague before their conversation could go live.
Israel’s airport authority also denied the allegations, saying Carlson’s team “were politely asked a few routine questions, in accordance with standard procedures applied to many travelers.” A longer statement from the U.S. Embassy in Israel also said Carlson’s decision to stay in Israel only a few hours without leaving the airport was his alone.
Carlson’s complaints drew withering reactions from Jews and others who said they recognized the intense security practiced at Ben Gurion. The conservative commentator John Podhoretz, for example, recounted on X how he had been questioned for 20 minutes because he was couriering a dress for a relative. “I’ve known Tucker was an asshole for 30 years but this takes the f–king cake,” he wrote.
The back-and-forth was a preview of the hotly anticipated interview between the two divergent flanks of the Christian MAGA coalition, whose public disagreements on Israel have paralleled a larger fissure in the Republican party. Carlson, the influential GOP kingmaker, has increasingly embraced anti-Israel talking points on his show at the same time as he has platformed conspiracy theorists and antisemites including Nick Fuentes. A growing number of young right-wing influencers and candidates are lining up behind his views.
Huckabee, meanwhile, is a leading evangelical Christian Zionist who has argued in favor of Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank. He publicly lobbied Carlson for a sit-down after Carlson used his podcast to criticize him for what Carlson described as a failure to intervene in Israeli demonization of Christians. Carlson agreed to a talk, and posted a picture of himself arriving Wednesday prior to the interview.
“Greetings from Israel,” Carlson posted to X, captioning a photo of him posing outside near an Israeli flag with his arm around business partner Neil Patel. (“Sell out,” Sneako, a livestreamer and Internet personality with a long streak of antisemitic and anti-Israel comments, wrote in reply.)
Greetings from Israel. pic.twitter.com/1uBWvqBNST
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 18, 2026
To some seasoned travelers, the location was obvious.
“That’s the walkway to the private jet terminal for VIP entry,” tweeted David Friedman, who was U.S. ambassador to Israel during President Donald Trump’s first term.
“After the Western Wall, the Temple Mount, the City of David, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the Garden of Gethsemene, Capernaum, the Sea of Galilee, Nazareth, Bethlehem, Yad Vashem, the Knesset and about 2 million other places, this walkway is an important site (but only if you fly on private jets),” he continued. “Too bad Tucker stayed in the airport in the face of so many invitations to see so many wonderful places. A huge and obviously intentional missed opportunity.”
Trump, an ally of both Carlson and Huckabee, may have also played a hand in arranging the interview, according to a former Fox News reporter who told the Times of Israel that Trump wanted to prevent an intra-party spat over Israel that could benefit Democrats. The source, Melissa Francis, also described the interview as “emotional” and said Carlson’s team had tried and failed to also arrange an interview with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Little about the interview process had been straightforward. The week before Carlson touched down in Israel, according to local reports, Israeli authorities had indeed briefly discussed whether to bar Carlson from entering the country over his past comments — something they routinely do for non-Jewish critics of Israel, even for prominent figures. They ultimately decided to avoid a diplomatic incident, according to reports.
In the days since agreeing to an interview with Huckabee, Carlson has posted new interviews with Ryan Zink, a pardoned Jan. 6 rioter and Texas congressional candidate; billionaire hedge-fund manager Ray Dalio; conspiracy theorist Ian Carroll; and former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul.
Carlson has not yet published his interview with Huckabee. But late Wednesday, he shared an interview about Israel, continuing the vendetta that started their exchange. “How does Israel treat Christians? We spoke to one whose family has lived there since Jesus. His story is shocking,” Carlson wrote to promote the video.
For Carlson’s Jewish critics, the whole day offered yet more evidence that whatever he ultimately says about Israel should be discounted.
“Tucker Carlson is a chickens–t. The guy who’s been spouting lies about Israel for the past two years, landed today at Ben Gurion airport, took a quick picture in the logistics zone, tweeted it to pretend he’s actually IN Israel (so he can later claim that he’s a serious reporter who toured Israel), didn’t even step foot in country, then made up a story that he’s being supposedly harassed by our security (didn’t happen), whined about it, got back into the private jet and flew off,” tweeted Naftali Bennett, the Israeli politician. “Next time he talks about Israel as if he’s some expert, just remember this guy is a phony!”
The post Tucker Carlson draws scorn for claiming he was ‘detained’ at Israeli airport after Mike Huckabee interview appeared first on The Forward.