Uncategorized
Unearthing the Hasmoneans: The Hanukkah-Era Wall That Speaks to Israel’s Present
Illustrative: The remains of a fortress destroyed by the Hasmonean rebels during the Maccabean revolt, Lachish Forest, Israel. Photographed in 2021. Photo: Twitter.
Archaeology rarely makes headlines. But every so often, a discovery surfaces that does more than illuminate the past — it clarifies the present.
The newly uncovered Hasmonean wall beneath Jerusalem’s Tower of David is one of those finds. It is not simply another artifact to be cataloged and displayed. It is a stone witness — silent but immovable — to the long and relentless Jewish struggle for sovereignty in this land. And at a time when Israel’s legitimacy is contested, distorted, or denied outright, its discovery could not be timelier.
The wall dates to the Maccabean period, an era historians often reduce to a footnote and schoolchildren remember as the backstory to Hanukkah.
But the Hasmoneans were not cartoon heroes resisting cartoon villains. They were political actors navigating the brutal geopolitics of their age — Judeans wrestling for autonomy against a Hellenistic empire, fighting over the right to govern themselves, to worship freely, and to determine their own future.
Now, we have physical confirmation of one of their defensive fortifications in Jerusalem: a wall built by Jews to defend Jewish Jerusalem — before Rome, before Byzantium, before the Caliphates, before the Crusaders. A wall predating every empire that later claimed this city while attempting to erase, reinterpret, or overwrite the people who first built it.
Archaeology vs. Historical Denial
What makes this discovery especially resonant is that it arrives amid a renewed wave of historical denial. Those who insist the Jewish connection to Jerusalem is a modern fabrication — colonial, foreign, or imposed — must now deny a structure that predates Islam by seven centuries and the Arab conquest by nearly a millennium.
The Hasmonean wall does not tell the whole story of Jerusalem; no single find ever could. But it does something powerful nevertheless: it joins a growing archaeological record that makes historical erasure impossible without embracing absurdity.
Modern Zionism did not arise in a vacuum. It was not conjured only out of poetry, yearning, or trauma — though it contains all those things. It emerged because the Jewish people, after millennia of statelessness and persecution, sought to restore something they had already built before.
The Hasmoneans were the first Jews in recorded history to achieve independent governance in Jerusalem after exile. Their reign was imperfect, but imperfection does not negate legitimacy. The point is not to romanticize them; the point is to recognize them.
The core struggle of the Hasmoneans — to maintain Jewish self-determination amid hostile regional forces — is the same struggle Israel faces today. The enemies have changed in name, flag, and rhetoric, but their aims are eerily familiar: to sever Jews from their homeland, define Jewish identity as illegitimate, and deny Jewish sovereignty in the land of Israel and Jerusalem.
Archaeology as a Battleground
Archaeology has become one of the most contested battlegrounds in the war over historical narrative — not because the artifacts are ambiguous, but because they are inconvenient. Every discovery that affirms Jewish antiquity threatens ideological projects built on the absurdity of denying it.
That’s why the politics around archaeology in Jerusalem will only intensify. Every trowel of earth is now an act of testimony. And every stone uncovered has the potential to expose those who insist — against all evidence — that Jewish sovereignty here is a colonial intrusion rather than the restoration of indigenous rights.
The Hasmonean wall does not resolve today’s political conflicts. But it does something essential: for those who don’t embrace the absurd, it places today’s debates within the only frame that makes them intelligible — the long arc of Jewish peoplehood in this land.
Jewish sovereignty in Judea is not new. It is the restoration of something ancient and indigenous. And Jerusalem is not simply the symbol of that recovery; it is the evidence of it.
As more sections of the city are excavated, they continue to tell the same story: the Jewish return to Zion is not an invention of modern nationalism. It is the latest chapter in an ongoing project — undertaken by ancestors who built walls to defend their freedom and by descendants who must still do the same.
And there is no time of year when this truth resonates more clearly than Hanukkah, a holiday too often reduced to merely candles and gifts. Hanukkah is, at its core, the celebration of Jewish sovereignty reclaimed, defended, and rededicated. It commemorates a people who refused to surrender their identity, faith, or homeland. The Jewish presence in Jerusalem is not a modern miracle, but an ancient one — rekindled across millennia.
Micha Danzig is an attorney, former IDF soldier, and former NYPD officer. He writes widely on Israel, Zionism, antisemitism, and Jewish history. He serves on the board of Herut North America.
Uncategorized
Saudi, French, US Officials Push Hezbollah Disarmament Plan
Lebanese army members stand on a military vehicle during a Lebanese army media tour, to review the army’s operations in the southern Litani sector, in Alma Al-Shaab, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, Nov. 28, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Aziz Taher
French, Saudi Arabian, and American officials held talks with the head of the Lebanese army on Thursday in Paris aimed at finalizing a roadmap to enable a mechanism for the disarmament of the Hezbollah terrorist group, diplomats said.
Israel and Lebanon agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire in 2024, ending more than a year of fighting between Israel and Hezbollah that severely weakened the Iran-backed terrorists.
Since then, the sides have traded accusations over violations with Israel questioning the Lebanese army’s efforts to disarm Hezbollah. Israeli warplanes have increasingly targeted Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and even in the capital.
Speaking after the meeting, France’s foreign ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux said the talks had agreed to document seriously with evidence the Lebanese army’s efforts to disarm Hezbollah as well as strengthening the existing ceasefire mechanism.
CEASEFIRE AT RISK
With growing fear the ceasefire could unravel, the Paris meeting aimed to create more robust conditions to identify, support, and verify the disarmament process and dissuade Israel from escalation, four European and Lebanese diplomats and officials told Reuters.
With legislative elections due in Lebanon in 2026, there are fears political paralysis and party politics will further fuel instability and make President Joseph Aoun less likely to press disarmament, the diplomats and officials said.
“The situation is extremely precarious, full of contradictions and it won’t take much to light the powder keg,” said one senior official speaking on condition of anonymity.
“Aoun doesn’t want to make the disarming process too public because he fears it will antagonize and provoke tensions with the Shi’ite community in the south of the country.”
With the Lebanese army lacking capacity to disarm Hezbollah, the idea would be to reinforce the existing ceasefire mechanism with French, US, and possibly other military experts along with UN peacekeeping forces, the diplomats and officials said.
The parties agreed to hold a conference in February to reinforce the Lebanese army, Confavreux said.
ISRAELI STRIKES
As officials convened for the talks, multiple Israeli strikes hit towns in southern Lebanon and areas of the Bekaa Valley on Thursday, Lebanon’s state news agency NNA reported.
The Israeli military said it struck Hezbollah targets across several areas, including a military compound used for training, weapons storage, and artillery launches, saying the activity violated understandings between Israel and Lebanon and posed a threat to Israel. It also said it struck a Hezbollah militant in the area of Taybeh in southern Lebanon.
Commenting on the attacks, parliament speaker and Hezbollah-allied Amal Movement leader Nabih Berri said the strikes were an “Israeli message” to the Paris conference, NNA added.
Uncategorized
Israel, Germany Sign $3.1 Billion Contract Expansion for Arrow Air Defense System
Flags flutter in front of a radom of the “Arrow Weapon System for Germany” pictured in Annaburg, Germany, Dec. 3, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Axel Schmidt
Israel and Germany signed a contract worth around $3.1 billion to expand the Arrow-3 air and missile defense system manufactured by Israel Aerospace Industries, Israel‘s defense ministry said on Thursday.
Germany first purchased the Arrow system in 2023, as it sees Russia’s intermediate-range missiles as the primary threat to its population and critical infrastructure.
“Combined, the two agreements total approximately $6.7 billion, representing the largest defense export deal in Israel’s history,” the ministry said.
Germany in December became the first European nation to deploy the Arrow air defense system, built to intercept intermediate-range ballistic missiles such as Russia’s Oreshnik, as it seeks to counter what it views as a growing threat from Moscow.
The system, developed by IAI in cooperation with the US Missile Defense Agency, is used as the upper layer of Israel‘s missile defenses, together with the Iron Dome, which takes out short-range threats.
Uncategorized
Trump Administration Imposes Sanctions on Two More ICC Judges for ‘Politicized Actions Targeting Israel’
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks during a US-Paraguay Status of Forces agreement signing ceremony at the State Department in Washington, DC, US, Dec. 15, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on two more judges from the International Criminal Court over their involvement in the court’s case against Israel, ratcheting up Washington’s pressure campaign against the war tribunal.
In November 2024, ICC judges issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict.
Israel has adamantly denied war crimes in Gaza, where it has waged a military campaign to eliminate Hamas following the terrorist group’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel.
The Trump administration has already imposed sanctions on nine ICC judges and prosecutors and threatened to designate the court in its entirety – a move that would be detrimental to its operations – if the ICC did not drop its charges against the Israeli leaders.
Washington’s other demands on the court are that it formally end an earlier probe of US troops over their actions in Afghanistan and change its founding statute to ensure that it would not pursue a prosecution of Trump and his top officials, a Trump administration official told Reuters last week.
“The ICC has continued to engage in politicized actions targeting Israel, which set a dangerous precedent for all nations. We will not tolerate ICC abuses of power that violate the sovereignty of the United States and Israel and wrongly subject US and Israeli persons to the ICC’s jurisdiction,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement.
Rubio said the United States was designating ICC judge Gocha Lordkipanidze from Georgia and Erdenebalsuren Damdin from Mongolia and said they had “directly engaged in efforts by the ICC to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute Israeli nationals, without Israel‘s consent.”
Earlier this year the US administration sanctioned six other judges and the court’s prosecutor Karim Khan and his two deputies.
The measures mean the judges cannot travel to the United States or hold any assets there, but they also make it virtually impossible for them to hold credit cards, making everyday financial transactions and online purchases difficult.
‘FLAGRANT ATTACK’
Rubio referred to the magistrates’ involvement in voting to reject one of several Israeli legal challenges against the ICC probe into its conduct of the Gaza war earlier this week.
The judges named were part of a panel that refused to overturn a lower court decision that the prosecution’s investigation into alleged crimes under its jurisdiction could include events following Hamas’s Oct. 7 atrocities, which included the murder of 1,200 people and kidnapping of 251 hostages during the Palestinian terrorists’ rampage across southern Israel.
The ICC said it deplored the new round of sanctions, which is the fourth round of measures this year.
“These sanctions are a flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution,” it said in a statement, adding that the measures put the international legal order at risk.
The ICC was founded in 2002 under a treaty giving it jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes that were either committed by a citizen of a member state or had taken place on a member state’s territory.
The ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel as it is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which established the court. Other countries including the US have similarly not signed the ICC charter. However, the ICC has asserted jurisdiction by accepting “Palestine” as a signatory in 2015, despite no such state being recognized under international law.
Th Netherlands, which hosts the ICC in The Hague, also condemned the sanctions and said international courts should be able to work without interference.
“International courts and tribunals must be able to carry out their mandates unhindered,” Dutch Foreign Minister David van Weel said on social media platform X.
The ICC’s decision to seek the arrest of Netanyahu has received widespread backlash.
Khan initially made his surprise demand for arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant on the same day in May that he suddenly canceled a long-planned visit to both Gaza and Israel to collect evidence of alleged war crimes. The last-second cancellation reportedly infuriated US and British leaders, as the trip would have offered Israeli leaders a first opportunity to present their position and outline any action they were taking to respond to the allegations.
However, the ICC said there were reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu and Gallant were criminally responsible for starvation in Gaza and the persecution of Palestinians — charges vehemently denied by Israel, which has provided significant humanitarian aid into the enclave during the war.
Israel also says it has gone to unprecedented lengths to try and avoid civilian casualties, despite Hamas’s widely acknowledged military strategy of embedding its terrorists within Gaza’s civilian population and commandeering civilian facilities like hospitals, schools, and mosques to run operations and direct attacks.
US and Israeli officials have issued blistering condemnations of the ICC move, decrying the court for drawing a moral equivalence between Israel’s democratically elected leaders and the heads of Hamas, which launched the war in Gaza with its Oct. 7 atrocities.