Local News
Sale of Town Island averted – for now
By BERNIE BELLAN
Originally published in the Feb. 5 issue of the JP&N
The one story that has preoccupied me most in recent weeks has been the impending sale of the portion of Town Island that is not owned by BB Camp, but which is owned by the City of Kenora. I am now glad to report that, at least for the time being, the sale of Town Island has been averted – not because the City of Kenora dropped the idea of selling it; rather, it was because Kenora did not receive one single “expression of interest” in buying the island, according to an email I received from Kenora’s Manager of Development Service, Adam Smith.
(In a previous issue I explained that Kenora was prepared to sell Town Island only to one buyer. Undoubtedly, the thought of having to go through environmental and other regulatory hurdles must have discouraged anyone who had considered putting in a bid for the island.)
While the “stay of execution” that so worried the “Friends of Town Island” must come as a relief to the thousands of individuals who had been waiting anxiously to see what would happen as of the deadline of January 31 for receipt of expressions of interest in Town Island, there has been much confusion surrounding this story.
The most recent element of confusion – and something I wrote about in our last issue, occurred when an online publication known as Kenora Online wrote in a headline that the Ontario Minister of Northern Development, someone by the name of Greg Rickford, had told a reporter for that publication that the Ontario government was interested in a land swap that would have seen Kenora hand over Town Island to the provincial government in exchange for Crown owned land either in or adjacent to Kenora. However, when I read that particular story, I concluded that the minister had never said anything about engaging in a land swap. In fact, what he was quoted as having said should have led one to the exact opposite conclusion: that Ontario was interested in developing Town Island, not conserving it.
I asked the reporter for Kenora Online how he had come to the conclusion that this particular minister was interested in a land swap when the minister’s own words gave no indication that was his intent, but the reporter simply said to me: “Why don’t you contact Rickford yourself?”
Subsequently, I did attempt to do that – by email, phone, and Twitter – all to no avail. I tried to enlist the help of other reporters, including from the Canadian Jewish News and the CBC, and those two outlets may still follow up my line of inquiry, but at this point it seems that the issue is moot: Unless Kenora reopens the process of putting up Town Island for sale again in the near future, BB Camp is saved from having to worry about the island being opened up for development.
Still, the fact that this Minister Rickford was so consistently unresponsive to my repeated requests for clarification just what his government’s position was re Town Island has led me to believe that the Kenora Online story was totally wrong: There was never any intention by the Ontario government to engage in a land swap with Kenora. This Rickford fellow was just another politician saying something innocuous – to the effect that he’s quite willing to work with Kenora, which a news publication interpreted to mean something else entirely. That’s why most provincial governments (and the Federal government for sure), keep armies of media personnel on hand to speak for their governments. They sure as heck don’t want politicians speaking off the cuff – only to see their words get totally misinterpreted.
Post script: I finally did receive an email from someone in Minister Rickford’s office – someone by the name of Sydey Stonier, who identified themself as Associate Director of Communications. The email came too late to include in the Feb. 5 issue of the JP&N, but here are some excerpts from the exchange of emails I had with Stonier:
I asked Stonier whether “the Ontario government iz prepared to engage in some sort of negotiation with the City of Kenora that would see Town Island preserved as a nature conservancy?”
Stonier responded, but didn’t answer my question directly, so I wrote back: “The bottom line is the Ontario government is not interested in doing anything that would preserve Town Island as a nature conservancy. Would that be a fair statement to make?”
Stonier responded: “That would not be a fair statement to make. Minister Rickford’s quote in the Kenora Online article is referring to finding development opportunities in the Kenora District in general, not a reference to the future use of Town Island as that is owned by the city.
“Ontario is only involved in this issue if there was to be a land swap with Kenora and MNRF to acquire additional crown lands for economic development. This land swap is no longer an option. Town Island is still owned by the City of Kenora, so you would need to ask them about any future plans.”
The question for now is: Will Kenora attempt to offer up Town Island for sale again? Nothing in either what Minister Rickford had to say, nor his Associate Director of Communications, offers the least bit of assurance that the Province of Ontario is at all interested in safeguarding Town Island from development.
Local News
Application filed by two former members of Etz Chayim Congregation against the congregation to have their memberships restored dismissed by judge
The following is taken from the Canadian Jewish News website: “Manitoba’s Court of King’s Bench has dismissed Hadass Eviatar and David Hoult’s application challenging the termination of their membership at Congregation Etz Chayim. In his decision, Justice Vic Toews noted that, although Hoult’s letter describing a hypothetical attack on the synagogue may have lacked sensitivity given the political climate, he did not intend to threaten violence against congregants. However, the judge ruled that the court did not have jurisdiction to intervene in the membership dispute under Manitoba’s Corporations Act, finding that the couple had no financial, proprietary or economic interest that would entitle them to the remedies they sought. The judge concluded that religious organizations are generally free to determine their own membership rules and ordered each side to bear its own legal costs.”
If you would like to read the original article that broke the story about the battle between Hadaass Eviatar and David Hoult with Etz Chayim Congregation you can go to Epic Court Battle.”
Local News
Jewish Federation now says Jewish population of Winnipeg in 2021 (according to the census) was 13,940 – not the 16,000 figure that the Federation had been touting for years
By BERNIE BELLAN (Posted Oct. 27, 2026) Longtime readers of The Jewish Post & News (and this website) would probably know that I have long had a very strong interest in establishing as accurate figures as possible when it has come to reporting the size of Winnipeg’s Jewish community.
For years I argued that our Jewish Federation was exaggerating the size of our Jewish population. I heard the figure of 16,000 bandied about by leaders in our community quite often when it came to reporting the size of our Jewish population – without any empirical evidence to back that figure up.
I had long maintained that the only reasonably accurate figures when it came to reporting the size of Winnipeg’s Jewish population were those produced by the late Evelyn Katz, when she was the unofficial demographer for the Jewish Federation – over 30 years ago. What Evelyn would do is keep careful track of births, deaths, numbers of newcomers but, perhaps most important: the number of people who had left our community.
Thus, in August 2022 when I interviewed Faye Rosenberg Cohen who, at the time, was just about to retire as the Jewish Federation’s Chief Planning and Allocations Officer, I was somewhat astonished to hear Faye say, when I asked her what proportion of our Jewish community was made up of immigrants, she answered that “I can honestly say when I look at those numbers it’s somewhere around 1/3 of the community.”
In response, I asked: “So you’d say it’s somewhere between 4-5,000?”
Faye said: “I think it’s more than that.”
I wrote in that article, “I indicated my skepticism at that time, saying ‘You know that I’ve always been skeptical about the numbers that have been used by the Federation for the population of the Jewish community. I think though that it’s always been more of a case of identification – who identifies as Jewish.’ ”
Later, after the results of the 2021 census were released, I wrote that “if you take into account the results of the 2021 census, the Jewish community cannot be larger than 14,270 at a maximum. But that figure would also include anyone who had either said either their ethnic origin was Jewish or their religion was Jewish.”
Since many of the individuals who had said on the 2021 census that their ethnic origin was Jewish, but their religion was something else, I maintained that ascertaining the real size of our Jewish community was highly problematic.
Still, for the sake of argument I was willing to accept that, realistically, it was somewhere between 13,000-14,000 – but nowhere close to the figure of 16,000 that had come to be suggested by our then president of the Jewish Federation or by other leading figures in our community.
So, it was with a sense of satisfaction that I heard Sharon Graham, who is now the Jewish Federation’s Community Planning and Allocations Lead say to an audience of over 50 people who were at the Gwen Secter Centre on Thursday, October 22, that the Jewish community in 2021 was – at a maximum: 13,940.
Sharon was at the Gwen Secter Centre to speak to Remis Lecture attendees. Her presentation preceded a presentation by Jewish Federation CEO Jeff Lieberman. Sharon used a PowerPoint presentation to provide some very interesting insights into where our Jewish community was at in 2021- and I’m offering some parts of her presentation here for you to read because I thought they were so interesting.
I had actually made many of the same observations about the results of the 2021 census in my own reporting back in 2022, but seeing what I had written confirmed by the Jewish Federation’s point person on planning told me that Sharon has a much more realistic view of our community than did Faye Rosenberg Cohen.
Here, for instance, is a slide that shows the proportion of our Jewish community that is made up of immigrants. It’s slightly under one fifth, not the one third percentage that Faye had suggested.
But, what really set Sharon’s presentation apart from anything else I’ve ever seen presented by someone from the Jewish Federation – other than the aforementioned Evelyn Katz, was the slide she projected which showed that, while there had been a large influx of newcomers to Winnipeg’s Jewish community between 2016-2021 there had also been a significantly high number of people who had left our Jewish community in those same years, as you can see in the following slide:
That is something we just don’t hear discussed by leaders of our Jewish organizations, but let’s be realistic: For many newcomers who came to Winnipeg and were counted as new members of our Jewish community, Winnipeg – for a variety of reasons, was a stepping stone to other communities. It may have been for reasons of better job opportunities, moving closer to other family members, or – the reason that we hear so often when it comes to people saying they want to leave Winnipeg: the weather.
But, whatever the reason, Sharon’s figures show that, as much as GrowWinnipeg may have been an abiding success when it’s come to attracting newcomers to our Jewish community here, getting them to stay long term is a different story.
And, while there were other aspects of Sharon’s presentation that certainly merit discussion, especially the figures she produced about intermarriage, rather than delving into them here, I thought it useful simply to insert them for you, the reader, to see – and draw your own conclusions.
Local News
Marty Green expands his protest against extremist Jewish settlers to two more venues – and is arrested twice more
(Tuesday, October 27) We received the following press release about Marty Green being arrested again, both at the University of Manitoba and at Shaarey Zedek Synagogue:
Both sides came to blows on Saturday, October 24, at the Shaarey Zedek Synagogue as security personnel sought to prevent Marty Green from interfering with synagogue traffic as he protested just outside synagogue grounds against the actions of religious settlers in Israel’s occupied West Bank territory. Synagogue Executive Director Rena Secter Elbaze quickly intervened to prevent further escalation. Police arrived shorty thereafter and detained Green for 45 minutes before driving him home and releasing him. It is not clear whether their decision not to lay charges was the result of their own onsite investigation or whether it was at the request of the synagogue executive.
Green has now been arrested four times in the last month and faces multiple charges for disturbing the peace, including two episodes at the Asper Campus and one more this past Friday (Oct. 23) at the University of Manitoba. While Green says initially he was merely handing out leaflets (at the Asper Campus), since his first arrest on September 23, he has returned to the campus with a large placard and an acccordion, accompanying himself while singing songs with lyrics that include such phrases as “The Jews Are Bananas….B-A-N-A-N-A-S”. In addition to listing actions of the religious settlers as including arson, vandalism, and theft, he pointedly alleges that the IDF has been backing up the settlers in their actions.
Green had earlier notified the Shaarey Zedek that he was contemplating bringing his protest to the synagogue. He was told that if he attempted to enter the grounds he would be prevented from doing so. At that time, Secter Elbaze told Green that his intentions were inappropriate, declaring the synagogue to be “a house of worship dedicated to prayer, learning, community, and spiritual engagement.” Green responded that if the synagogue were willing to contact the Crown and inform them that “that there was never any legal basis for their claims that I was conducting myself inappropriately at the Asper Campus” (with regard to his earlier arrests) that he would “voluntarily refrain from carrying his informational campaign to the synagogue(s).”
Green further argues that the recent “psak” (religious ruling) by leading Israeli rabbi Rov Dov Lior, in which Lior declares that it is not merely permissible but praiseworthy for Jews to steal olives from Arab orchards….that this ruling brings his protest within the proper realm of religious discourse. He says further that if the local rabbis were willing to speak out to their congregations against the aforesaid psak, that he might have refrained from taking his campaign to their grounds.
Although Green was released on Saturday without charges, police confiscated his placard. They explained that it was being held as evidence pending an investigation by Major Crimes as to whether it constituted hate literature.
There was no further information given as to what happened at the University of Manitoba.
