Local News
Simkin Centre receives positive review from WRHA following unannounced inspection
By BERNIE BELLAN As a result of the many problems associated with personal care homes in Winnipeg, the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority has been conducting unannounced inspections of personal care homes throughout the city.
On May 26 a team of five, including three representatives from Manitoba Health and two from the WRHA, visited the Simkin Centre.
Their report was released July 5.
The team assessed the Simkin Centre in 15 different areas. In conducting the review, the team members spoke with 10 different residents of the centre along with 24 staff members. In addition, 17 different family members also responded to questions posed by the team. The report does not make clear the process by which respondents were chosen to respond to questions.
Respondents were asked to answer questions with one of six possible responses:
Always; Usually; Neutral; Rarely; Never; No comment.
When it came to residents’ responses to questions, they were generally quite positive. For instance, when asked “Do you find this home to be clean and comfortable?” five residents responded “Always,” while five said “Usually.”
When asked, “Do you feel safe in this home?” nine answered “Always,” while one answered “Usually.”
There were 10 questions posed to residents altogether. The one question that elicited only one response of “Always” and only two responses of “Usually”, but six “Neutral” responses was this: “Do you like the food here?”
In follow-up comments the review noted that residents were asked, “If you could change three things about this home, what would you change?”
The one area that received the most responses had to do with food. The review noted that “Four of the ten residents interviewed identified food and the menu as something they would change such as: more resident preferences, variety in menu, food familiar to this generation, better food and more diverse menu that reflects the diverse population.” (emphasis mine).
Readers of this paper might recall that a few months back we delved into the question whether having to serve only kosher food at the Simkin Centre was having an effect on the overall quality of the food served to residents. At the time we noted that many privately run Jewish personal care homes in the United States had begun offering both kosher and non-kosher meals to residents.
At the same time we wondered just how many residents of the Simkin Centre were not Jewish. We had written that anecdotally we had been told by some residents that there was a much higher proportion of non-Jewish residents at the centre than had previously been the case.
In response, Gerry Kaplan, Chair of the Simkin Centre Board of Directors, wrote: “Regarding the ratio of Jewish to non-Jewish residents, over the years approximately 60% to 65% of our residents have been Jewish. As Laurie Cerqueti (CEO of the Simkin Centre) noted when you contacted her, the numbers vary over time.”
In response to an email I had sent to Laurie Cerqueti on July 13, asking her how many of the residents at the Simkin Centre currently are not Jewish, Laurie wrote back (on July 18): “We currently have 90 non Jewish Residents living at the Centre” (emphasis mine).
(Ed. note: That figure equates to 45% of the residents at the centre, if the centre is at maximum capacity). Laurie added: “ We continue to be the home of choice for Jews and non-Jews that require personal care home services. As I have mentioned previously, people from the Jewish community are priorized for admission to Simkin and are admitted pretty much immediately.”
With regard to the quality and diversity of food, however, Rabbi Yosef Benarroch, Spiritual Leader of the Adas Yeshurun-Herzlia Congregation, also head of the Vaad Hakashrut of Winnipeg, objected to my contention that the quality of food at the Simkin Centre was not as good as it could be if the Simkin Centre were not required to remain fully kosher. Rabbi Benarroch wrote in a January email: “I was quite surprised to read your piece on the Simkin advocating for the facility to go non kosher and provide packaged meals for those who want kosher. In the seven years that I have been overseeing Kashrut at the Simkin there has not been a single such request. Not from the administration, not from residents and not from families including the non Jewish residents. The quality of the food is excellent and I can say this first hand with my mother being a resident.”
The responses from residents to other questions were unilaterally positive; however, one should bear in mind that the sample size (10 residents out of a total population that could be up to 200 depending on the number of vacancies at any given time) of residents was quite small. Also, one might bear in mind that many of the residents are not in a position to be able to respond in a cogent manner to questions of the sort that the review team posed.
Still, when it came to responses from family members (of whom there were 17 who gave responses), again the responses were generally quite positive, ranging from 15 out of 17 responding “Always” to two questions about whether the staff treats family members respectfully, to does the staff take time to talk to you and answer your questions?
Following are some comments from family members:
“The following statements are from my Mom, when asked what do you feel about her unit. ‘Everything is so clean’, ‘I feel safe’, ‘very well trained’, ‘I enjoy the activities’, ‘the food is good’, ‘caring and kind’, ‘you’re funny’, ‘I love their smiling eyes’, ‘staff are good natured’, ‘patient’, ‘fast response’, ‘loving’ and ‘I feel cared for’. I feel so blessed and comforted that my Mom is at Simkin. The communication is outstanding! The nurses and doctors and entire team treat my Mom like their own. Her above comments tell our story. I am so impressed with the safety protocols, meal delivery, personal protective equipment supplies, housekeeping and medical care. Simkin was our first choice at paneling and it still is our first choice after six months.”
“Some patients need more fluids so they should be encouraged to drink more.”
“I am grateful to all staff. COVID has been awful but staff have been heroic.”
When it comes to staff responses to questions, while the general attitude was quite positive, the one area that jumps out has to do with staffing, where six out of the 24 respondents answered either “Neutral” or “Rarely” in response to the question: “Do you feel there is adequate staffing in your department to complete all work required?”
However, when it came to assessing the Simkin Centre’s response to dealing with infection control and prevention during Covid, the responses were overwhelmingly positive, with 24 respondents saying the centre “Always” or “Usually” responded well.
Many of the staff added comments about working at Simkin. The issue of wanting higher wages surfaced several times. Here are all the comments received from staff:
“It has been 5 years since our contract was renewed. I am considered an essential worker but they can’t give me a cost of living raise.
“Simkin Centre has a strong sense of teamwork. Management builds strength in their team by assigning responsibilities and training for the job they are trained to do. When things are not going well, nursing management has an open door policy to take forward any issues, concerns and frustrations. Problem solving is key at Simkin. We meet as a team and work quickly to problem solve, educate, train or adapt to the situation in front of us. The slogan Simkin strong / Simkin cares. It has built morale with all departments.
“I am quite happy with management. They do try and provide what we need.
“PCH’s need more funding to hire more staff to increase the resident’s quality of life and to decrease staff burn out, both physically and mentally. The pandemic has proved that we need to do better for PCHs, now more than ever.
“An amazing facility! I couldn’t imagine working anywhere else. The care at the home is second to none!
“I have worked her (sic.) at Simkin for over 25 years. And have always enjoyed it for the opportunity of having a full time job and doing something that helps others.
“There are always things that can be improved BUT overall, Simkin is a good facility to work at. Recreation is a priority and has a healthy budget.
“Barely functioning on my department due to lack of staffing. People are stressed out and overworked. Almost always have to expect to work short and extra hours. Long time casuals and part timers don’t like to pick up hours because work environment is not enjoyable or feel it’s worth it.
“We need additional staffing for housekeeping and we need increase for
Local News
Jewish Federation holds first ever “town hall”
By BERNIE BELLAN It was a relatively small turnout – maybe 70 people were at the Shaarey Zedek Sunday morning, June 14 – but it may have been the start of a new foray by the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg into community outreach when a “town hall” was held to which members of the Jewish community had been invited to attend.
I had broached the idea of the Federation’s holding a community town hall with Federation CEO Jeff Lieberman back in the fall on an evening when he and newly installed Federation President Carrie Shenkarow had invited members of the community to come meet them for some one on one conversations.
I was disappointed that evening how few individuals showed up, so I shouldn’t have been surprised that the turnout for the town hall itself was relatively low.
But, give full marks to Lieberman and the others who were on the panel with him on June 14 for coming out to an event where they were prepared to answer any and all questions from audience members, as well as respond to questions that had been sent in by members of the community prior to the actual town hall.
Now, I should make clear that I have a particular position when it comes to attending any type of forum of the sort the Jewish Federation held, which is that any and all questions should be allowed – even if those questions might anger both the respondents to the question and audience members as well.
Toward almost the very end of the town hall I did ask a question that did elicit a somewhat negative reaction from within the audience – about the uproar over the upcoming Nakba exhibit at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, but I’ll save what I asked and the response I got for later. Suffice to say for the time being, it seems apparent the suggestion that some Palestinians were forcibly expelled from their homes and have a right to have their story told is anathema to many in the Jewish community.
The town hall was moderated by Neil Duboff. Accompanying Duboff on the podium at the Shaarey Zedek were four other individuals, each of whom was representing a particular Jewish organization: the aforesaid Jeff Lieberman, CEO of the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg; Dr. Ruth Ashrafi, Regional Director, B’nai Brith Canada; Gustavo Zentner, CIJA Vice-President, Manitoba and Saskatchewan; and Bellle Jarniewski, Executive Director, The Jewish Heritage Centre of Western Canada. Later in the program, they were joined on the podium by Rabbi Anibal Mass of Shaarey Zedek Congregation.
Each of the panellists gave what turned out to be fairly lengthy descriptions of what it is they do in their opening remarks, lasting a total of 20 minutes.
From time to time William Sagel, who is community security director for the Jewish Federation, but was not present in person, also joined in the discussion via a remote link.
Rather than report on how each of the panellists described what they do in their respective positions, I’ll jump right into the question and answer session that ensued. However, the initial question and answer segment of the program turned out to consist of questions that had been submitted beforehand and were read out by Neil Duboff, who took turns asking different panellists to respond to different questions.
Considering that a town hall is supposed to be a forum where, after opening remarks by whoever is going to respond to questions from audience members, the floor is supposed to be opened up to members of the audience to ask questions, having Neil Duboff read questions that had been submitted beforehand contradicted what is supposed to happen at a town hall, but hey: This was a first for our community, so I’ll give them a pass this town – but guys, next time – if there is a next time, how about having a real town hall?
What follows are snippets of what turned out to be a very long event that ran well past the allotted two hours that had originally been set aside. (If answers to questions posed, either by Duboff – reading from questions that had been submitted or by actual audience members themselves, seem exceptionally short, it’s for reasons of space, not because respondents gave abbreviated answers.)
The first question Duboff asked, and which was directed at Gustavo Zentner, was: “What is CIJA’s strategy for holding public officials accountable when current laws are not being enforced?”
Zentner responded that he prefers to meet one on one with officials – on a confidential basis, but he tries “to set a paper trail of accountability.”
One particular event that had a significant impact on the relationship CIJA (as well as other community organizations, other panellists noted) has had with politicians at various levels of government was the Bondi Beach attack in Australia last December during Chanukah, when 15 people were killed and 40 wounded by two gunmen who opened fire as members of the Sydney Jewish community were gathered to celebrate Chanukah on the beach.
Zentner noted that, following that attack, he met with the premier of Manitoba as well as the leader of the opposition, to discuss how the Manitoba government could bolster security for the Jewish community here.
Zentner said that, coming out of that discussion, the Manitoba government has now created a position of prosecutor specifically to deal with hate crimes and that the government “gave specific funds for security infrastructure for the community.”
He added that “two weeks ago” the Winnipeg Chief of Police released hate crime stats for the City of Winnipeg. “We were interviewed four times in 24 hours” about what the chief had said, Zentner added.
The next question Duboff asked was addressed to Jeff Lieberman: “What does the Federation do to prevent people from attending events who aren’t invited?”
Lieberman answered: “We pre-register” attendees.
He also said he wanted to add something to Zentner’s response to the question asked about holding public officials accountable.
He referred to Premier Wab Kinew’s controversial comment at the Federal NDP convention, held this past March, when Kinew said “Let the Epstein class fight the Epstein war” – a remark that was widely regarded as a dog whistle to antisemites.
Lieberman said that “Kinew said some things that were not favourable. We met with him and around one month later we got $1 million in new funding for security.”
Duboff asked Ruth Ashrafi to comment about the upcoming Nakba exhibit at the CMHR – which is scheduled to open June 27.
Ashrafi noted that in December 2023, in response to Israel’s incursion into Gaza following the October 7 massacre, there had been a “die-in” at the CMHR and word began to circulate that the CMHR was preparing to open an exhibit about the Nakba.
In April 2024, Ashrafi said, lawyer David Matas, acting on behalf of B’nai Brith Canada, sent a letter to the CMHR, in which he voiced reasons that such an exhibit should not be mounted.
In November 2025, Ashrafi added, Jewish organizations were supposed to be informed about the Nakba exhibit, “but B’nai Brith wasn’t informed.”
She also referred to “all that other nonsense you can be a very good Jew and a non-Zionist.”
Belle Jarniewski also spoke about the Nakba exhibit, saying “consultation has not taken place on the exhibit…The problematic title suggests that the very creation and ongoing existence of the State of Israel is an ongoing catastrophe…This exhibit is putting a target on the backs of Jews across Canada…They (the CMHR) consulted with six percent of Jews across Canada – who are not Zionists…Carla Compton (the newly elected MLA for Tuxedo) said that ‘a museum is supposed to be about facts, not feelings’…The museum refused to say who is on the advisory council for the exhibit.”
Gustavo Zentner added: “The moment we were advised of the exhibit in November we asked them (the CMHR) not to make any more announcements…It is the federal government’s responsibility to take action on this problem. It doesn’t matter whether the government appointed the board.”
Duboff asked Lieberman: “What security planning is underway for community events?”
Lieberman asked Williams Sagel to respond. Sagel said there are security enhancements being implemented across a wide swath of community institutions, but he didn’t want to get into details.
Duboff asked a follow-up question: “What do you say to the suggestion that community responses to security threats are inadequate?”
Lieberman responded that “We have to be very careful what we do.”
Questions from the audience then followed. As one might expect, given the opportunity to speak, once handed the microphone, most audience members would go on and on without asking a question.
Here, in capsule form, are some of the questions asked:
“Why is there no Israeli person on the panel?”
“Why not put on a counter exhibit to the CMHR exhibit at the Convention Centre?”
“Why do we have three different organizations dealing with antisemitism?” (Actually, the questioner could have asked “Why do we have four different organizations” doing that, because the Jewish Federation, B’nai Brith, CIJA, and the recently formed Manitoba Institute to Combat Antisemitism, which is part of the Jewish Heritage Centre of Western Canada, all deal with antisemitism in one way or another.)
“How is what Belle is doing different from what Ruth and Gustavo are doing?”
Jarniewski responded: “We all collaborate all the time.”
A questioner asked what can be done about the Winnipeg Free Press which, he suggested, rarely prints an op-ed defending Israel.
Lieberman said: “It is not our mandate to take a stand against that particular business.”
A questioner asked “Why isn’t ‘Shomrim’ incorporated into the community?”
For readers unfamiliar with who “Shomrim” are, here is something generated by AI about Shomrim: “Shomrim Toronto is a dedicated volunteer organization committed to ensuring the safety and security of the Jewish communities across the Greater Toronto Area. As guardians of peace (Shalom), we bridge the gap between the community and local law enforcement through vigilant community patrols, educational programs, and direct incident response.”
In Montreal, “This is the community safety and emergency response patrol operating primarily within the Hasidic and broader Jewish communities (particularly in the Tosh and Outremont areas).”
Lieberman responded: “The organizations in Toronto an Montreal have been operated for numerous years.”
William Sagel added: “We’re training volunteers for the future.”
Then, I asked my question, followed by angry muttering from the audience. I began by suggesting that the Jewish community is far more diffuse than the panelists would have us believe and the idea that there is unanimity about the Nakba is not right. I also said that speaking at this particular “town hall” was really nothing more than speaking in an ‘echo chamber’ since none of the questions asked dared to challenge accepted wisdoms about Israel and the Nakba. I asked: “Is it not possible to acknowledge the existence of what Palestinians refer to as the Nakba?” (And, for anyone who might think what I said was absolutely outrageous, I simply suggest you do some reading about what Israeli leaders, including David Ben Gurion, Chaim Weizman, and many others, said about the necessity of expelling large portions of the Palestinian population in order to create a viable State of Israel. I deal in reality, not mythology. And yes, I know that 800,000 Jews were also forced to leave their homes in Arab lands.)
Gustavo Zentner said: “The museum has not been transparent in its dealings….The (federal) government has a responsibility to step in and handle its responsibilities for corporate governance.”
A series of questions were asked by audience members about financial aid for members of the community, either to attend Gray Academy or Jewish camps. One audience member said that more parents are now sending their kids to Gray Academy or to Jewish camps as a result of antisemitism, but there was a need for more bursaries for those kids.
Jeff Lieberman agreed that “more and more kids” have left public schools and enrolled in Gray Academy after facing antisemitism in public school. He added that Gray Academy is giving out “$1 million in bursaries” each year. Lieberman pointed out that Gray Academy Head of School Lori Binder was in the audience and he asked her to come to the front to address the question of financial aid for parents wanting to send their kids to Gray Academy.
Binder said: “No one who comes to our door will ever be denied a Jewish education,” but in response to the suggestion from one audience member that non-Jewish families are receiving financial aid to send their kids to Gray Academy, Binder was unequivocal in saying that’s not true, saying that “non-Jewish families are not receiving financial assistance at all.”
Although this has been a long article to read (if you made it this far) I’ve really only attempted to give a flavour of what happened at the town hall. By the time it was nearing an end, Neil Duboff suggested that it would be a good idea to hold another such town hall. Yes, tempers may fray at a town hall (and I’m used to being criticized for daring to say things that don’t go over well with many others), but it was a very civil discussion, albeit with not enough time for questions from actual audience members. Full credit to Jeff Lieberman for following through on my suggestion to hold a town hall. And now that there’s been one – and the organizers may have learned where they can improve things, it would be a good idea to hold another one – but please, try to include members of the community who are either disaffected – which I would suggest is the majority of the Jewish community, or even those who are stridently opposed to the positions taken by our established Jewish organizations.
Local News
Temple Shalom suffers significant flood damage – rendered unusable for rest of the summer
The following notification was recently received from Temple Shalom:
Dear members and friends of Temple Shalom,
As you all know by now, Temple Shalom suffered significant damage when part of the building flooded during the intense storm last week. I wanted to take this opportunity to provide you with a quick update on the situation at this time.
The flood primarily affected the entryway, the stairs, the lobby outside the sanctuary and the lobby downstairs. There is also a smaller amount of damage to other areas of the building, including the kitchen, the music room and the sanctuary. The damage is extensive and we have now learned that asbestos is present in the flooded area of the building and that we will need to undertake a major abatement project before the actual repairs can begin.
Steve has been managing this project and is working with our insurance company, restoration company, roofers, electricians and other trades. Flynn Roofing was able to assess and make temporary repairs to the roof, and so far, there have been no further leaks. Steve and Bernie have been working tirelessly to remove water, clean up debris and move furnishings and other material out of areas that will need repair. Cynthia has been answering phone calls and emails and making arrangements for the next steps in this process.
It is now clear that we will not be able to use the building this summer. By next week, no unauthorized individuals will be permitted in the building, and our staff will be working from home. We are still working on a location for our services this summer and will let you know the arrangements as soon as they are finalized; we are grateful to the congregations and community organizations that have already reached out to us and offered space. Currently, our Torahs are safe at Shaarey Zedek. Until the location for in-person services is confirmed, we will hold our services on Zoom (details to follow).
We are planning ways to keep our community together during this time.
Judith
President, Temple Shalom
Local News
Chesed Shel Emes is hiring
Chesed Shel Emes is looking for a daytime “Shomer Plus” – an individual who understands and appreciates the depth and significance of Shmira, who is able to assume some of the day to day tasks managing our facility, and who can take on some of the administrative work – be it graphic design, social media management, Board support, or providing back up for our 24/7 on call staff.
This is a unique position which calls for a blend of the spiritual and the practical. We are offering a part time, salaried, daytime position, with employee benefits. The successful candidate will need to be flexible, patient and have a sense of humor.
For more information contact Rena Boroditsky, executive director of Chesed Shel Emes at chesedwinnipeg@gmail.com or phone 204-582-5088
