Features
David Asper has brought excitement to a new generation of basketball fans with the Winnipeg Sea Bears
By BERNIE BELLAN
June 8, 2023 The name David Asper has long been associated with Winnipeg sports teams.
A former Chair of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers – and someone who achieved both notoriety for how directly involved he became with that team – even going so far as to invade the locker room after a particularly brutal loss (only to be pushed out by now CEO Wade Miller), Asper was also involved with a pro basketball team known as the Winnipeg Thunder, which played here from 1992-94.
This past year, however, Asper took another foray into sports at the ownership level with Winnipeg’s newest sports franchise, the Winnipeg Sea Bears.
The Sea Bears play in a summer league – which is also when the Winnipeg Thunder, a team in which Asper also had an owership stake played. (Another team, the Winnipeg Cyclone, owned by Earl Barish, played in the winter.),
The Sea Bears franchise is the newest addition to what is now a 10-team All Canadian league known as the Canadian Elite Basketball League. So far, by any measure, the team is off to a roaring start.
Recently I chatted with Asper about what led him to enter – again, into the risky world of professional sports and why he’s confident that this time around, the Sea Bears and the league they play in, will be lasting successes.
I began by asking him whether he’s pleased with the attendance at Sea Bears games thus far? (At the time of our conversation the team had played five home games, with an average attendance over 4,000 each game.)
“Yes, I’m very pleased with the reception we’ve gotten so far,” Asper said, “but it’s my nature – it’s the entrepreneur’s curse, to be very cautious about it, because when we began – when you start a business – any business, you never know whether anyone’s going to actually show up and, if they do, whether they’ll keep coming back.”
I suggested to Asper that the history of pro basketball teams in Winnipeg is less than impressive, but he responded that the Winnipeg Thunder actually did “very well,” but “both leagues that the team was affiliated with collapsed.”
“The Thunder played in the summer. The Cyclone played in the winter. I had a better perspective of seeing what would happen if you played in the summer – which is what appealed to me about this league,” Asper added.
I asked, “How far back in time did your planning for the Sea Bears begin?”
Asper said he “started in the spring of ’22, spent time all last summer going across country to games, and then I decided I really liked what I was seeing. I was concerned about the show – the competitiveness of the basketball – and I’m not a basketball person, but I think I have a sense of when something is entertaining and athletic.
“By mid-summer we thought we were going to go for it, we had some negotiation with the league, and we were finally able to announce – late, relatively speaking, at the end of November. We put ourselves in quite a time crush being able to launch for 2023 because training camp starts mid-May, so we only had five months really. We had to hire staff, get tickets out and get ourselves prepared, so it’s been a very hectic time.”
I said to Asper that I wasn’t all that familiar with the Canadian Elite Basketball League and he did give me some of the league’s history, but after the interview I dug deeper into the league’s history.
The CEBL is now in its fifth season, having begun in the summer of 2019, originally with six teams, which were all owned by the league. It now has ten teams in two divisions, from six different provinces:The east division is made up of one team in Quebec (in Montreal), and four in Ontario (in Brampton, Niagara, Ottawa, and Scarborough); and a west division: one in Manitoba (the Sea Bears), one in Saskatchewan (in Saskatoon); two in Alberta (in Calgary and Edmonton), and one in BC (in Langley).
While five of the teams are still owned by the league, there are now five private owners – in Langley, Calgary, Edmonton, and Scarborough, in addition to Asper in Winnipeg.
For the most part the teams play in smaller venues, with the exception of the Sea Bears, who play in Canada Life Centre, which can hold over 15,000 (although seating is confined to the lower level).
Another difference between the CEBL and other leagues that have come and gone in Canada is the heavy emphasis on Canadian players on each team. As Asper explained, each team has 10 players, of whom six have to be Canadian, three can be American, and a tenth can be international.
“We collaborate with Basketball Canada,” Asper observed, and it is a great opportunity for Canadian university players to hone their skills.
Not only that, Asper added that “last year nine players coming out of our league signed NBA contracts,” which gives you an idea what a high level of basketball is played in the CEBL.
According to Wikipedia, each team operates under a salary cap of only $8,000 per team per game. (There are 20 regular games, followed by a round robin playoff tournament modeled on the NCAA Final Four tournament.)
I asked Asper about what I described as his “abiding interest in sports,” given his history of involvement with both pro basketball and football teams.
He said that he thinks “sport is an important part of culture.”
“Where does it come from?” I asked.
“Well, I played sports as a kid,” Asper answered. “I didn’t play basketball, but I’ve seen the power of sports to be inclusive, to be inspirational, to be a shared common experience. I believe very strongly – I know that others in the arts community will dispute it, but I believe sports is as integral to culture as is art and other forms of activities.”
I asked Asper about the role he played in the building of IG Field (where the Blue Bombers now play).
He said that it was never his idea to build a new stadium at the University of Manitoba.
“My plan was to build it at Polo Park and I had everyone lined up and agreed to build it there. I don’t know what happened. I had led the whole project and Greg Selinger wound up taking it over.
I remarked: “Oh yah, I remember, there was an election.”
Turning back to the Sea Bears, I observed that, from pictures in the paper and what I had seen on TV, the team has been drawing a much younger crowd than say the Bombers or Jets – and a far more diverse crowd ethnically. I asked Asper whether that was part of the plan when he thought of starting a basketball team here.
He said, “The answer is yes. When I went across the country last summer and went to games and talked to fans, you could visibly see who was there and a lot of them were young families. There were also grandparents – people my age. It was a broader demographic than I thought it would be. I think that seeing young people at a game is very appealing to a broad age demography, but Bernie, when I would talk to first or second generation Canadians at those games, these were not people who grew up with hockey or football, but for them – basketball – when I talked about shared common experience and shared culture, I’m talking about these families – these new Canadians, meeting with legacy, old Canadians and having a shared common experience as Canadians that was so heart-warming. I said: ‘I want to be part of this.’
“It may be relatively small compared to football and hockey, but it’s doing a service. It’s serving a larger purpose, and what we’ve seen at the games so far – and it really overwhelms me, is that’s exactly what’s happening in Winnipeg.”
“I was talking to kids at the last game – they were part of two youth groups, who had never been to Canada Life Centre and came for the first time to a basketball game – and it blew their minds. They could not believe how great this was – predominantly new Canadians.”
I asked what the ticket price structure is?
Asper said, “They start at roughly 20 bucks. We try to have an entry point for families that’s very accessible.”
I asked whether Ruth (David’s wife) is involved with the team (since she was pictured seated along side David at the first game)?
Asper said, “No, but she’s the team’s number 2 fan.” He also told me that Ruth has a very strong background herself in sports.
I said that I remembered when she was co-owner of Tights, along with other fitness centers in Winnipeg over the years.
Asper said, “Not only that, but Ruth was the trainer for the (University of Manitoba) Bisons football team and she was the trainer for the Churchill Bulldogs football team. She’s in the Churchill Bulldogs Hall of Fame. She really has an experiential perspective on sports. She’s not involved, but she certainly knows the owner – let’s put it that way.”
I wondered about the stability of this particular basketball league – given the past failures of other basketball leagues that had Winnipeg franchises.
“Have there been any teams that have dropped out since the league started five years ago?” I asked.
“There was a team in Newfoundland, and it dropped out,” Asper answered. “Other teams have moved to different markets, so Hamilton moved to Brampton, Guelph had a team that moved to Calgary – which was important because that created a west and an east division. The league has seen unparalleled success this year. The growth in the league is really quite remarkable.”
Asper also noted that “We’re trying to build a sustainable summer event, so it takes a significant investment to start a team up, but the owners who are either starting or acquiring franchises are very committed to investing and growing. The league itself has come through its start-up anarchy, which is always the case in a start-up anything and now it’s moving into scaling up – because it’s working. People want to see this product.”
He also observed that the league is very competitive. Because it’s such a short season (only 20 games), “every single game matters.”
Asper explained that “we have a unique ending to the games” (in the CEBL). “Instead of the clock just running out – like you’d see in an NBA game, where you’d see them try to manage the clock, where the team that’s winning will try to run out the clock and the team that’s losing will try to create fouls and slow it down, what we do is, at the first stoppage in play with close to four minutes left to go in the game we create what’s called a ‘target score,’ so we add nine to the leading team’s score, so that, for example, the score is 84-80, then we turn off the clock, and the first team to 93 wins.
“So, not only does every game matter, the way the games end are so exciting that people leave feeling exhilarated or demoralized. There’s a really emotional way that our games end that really creates a compelling fan experience.”
I asked: “Anything else you want to add?”
Asper said: “Get your tickets at seabears.ca!”
Features
So, what’s the deal with the honey scene in ‘Marty Supreme?’
By Olivia Haynie December 29, 2025 This story was originally published in the Forward. Click here to get the Forward’s free email newsletters delivered to your inbox.
There are a lot of jarring scenes in Marty Supreme, Josh Safdie’s movie about a young Jew in the 1950s willing to do anything to secure his spot in table tennis history. There’s the one where Marty (Timothée Chalamet) gets spanked with a ping-pong paddle; there’s the one where a gas station explodes. And the one where Marty, naked in a bathtub, falls through the floor of a cheap motel. But the one that everybody online seems to be talking about is a flashback of an Auschwitz story told by Marty’s friend and fellow ping-ponger Béla Kletzki (Géza Röhrig, best known for his role as a Sonderkommando in Son of Saul).
Kletzki tells the unsympathetic ink tycoon Milton Rockwell (Kevin O’Leary) about how the Nazis, impressed by his table tennis skills, spared his life and recruited him to disarm bombs. One day, while grappling with a bomb in the woods, Kletzki stumbled across a honeycomb. He smeared the honey across his body and returned to the camp, where he let his fellow prisoners lick it off his body. The scene is a sensory nightmare, primarily shot in close-ups of wet tongues licking sticky honey off Kletzki’s hairy body. For some, it was also … funny?
Many have reported that the scene has been triggering a lot of laughter in their theaters. My audience in Wilmington, North Carolina, certainly had a good chuckle — with the exception of my mother, who instantly started sobbing. I sat in stunned silence, unsure at first what to make of the sharp turn the film had suddenly taken. One post on X that got nearly 6,000 likes admonished Safdie for his “insane Holocaust joke.” Many users replied that the scene was in no way meant to be funny, with one even calling it “the most sincere scene in the whole movie.”
For me, the scene shows the sheer desperation of those in the concentration camps, as well as the self-sacrifice that was essential to survival. And yet many have interpreted it as merely shock humor.
Laughter could be understood as an inevitable reaction to discomfort and shock at a scene that feels so out of place in what has, up to that point, been a pretty comedic film. The story is sandwiched between Marty’s humorous attempts to embarrass Rockwell and seduce his wife. Viewers may have mistaken the scene as a joke since the film’s opening credits sequence of sperm swimming through fallopian tubes gives the impression you will be watching a comedy interspersed with some tense ping-pong playing.
The reaction could also be part of what some in the movie theater industry are calling the “laugh epidemic.” In The New York Times, Marie Solis explored the inappropriate laughter in movie theaters that seems to be increasingly common. The rise of meme culture and the dissolution of clear genres (Marty Supreme could be categorized as somewhere between drama and comedy), she writes, have primed audiences to laugh at moments that may not have been meant to be funny.
The audience’s inability to process the honey scene as sincere may also be a sign of a society that has become more disconnected from the traumas of the past. It would not be the first time that people, unable to comprehend the horrors of the Holocaust, have instead derided the tales of abuse as pure fiction. But Kletzki’s story is based on the real experiences of Alojzy Ehrlich, a ping-pong player imprisoned at Auschwitz. The scene is not supposed to be humorous trauma porn — Safdie has called it a “beautiful story” about the “camaraderie” found within the camps. It also serves as an important reminder of all that Marty is fighting for.
The events of the film take place only seven years after the Holocaust, and the macabre honey imagery encapsulates the dehumanization the Jews experienced. Marty is motivated not just by a desire to prove himself as an athlete and rise above what his uncle and mother expect of him, but above what the world expects of him as a Jew. His drive to reclaim Jewish pride is further underscored when he brings back a piece of an Egyptian pyramid to his mother, telling her, “We built this.”
Without understanding this background, the honey scene will come off as out of place and ridiculous. And the lengths Marty is willing to go to to make something of himself cannot be fully appreciated. The film’s description on the review-app Letterboxd says Marty Supreme is about one man who “goes to hell and back in pursuit of greatness.” But behind Marty is the story of a whole people who have gone through hell; they too are trying to find their way back.
Olivia Haynie is an editorial fellow at the Forward.
This story was originally published on the Forward.
Features
Paghahambing ng One-on-One Matches at Multiplayer Challenges sa Pusoy in English
Ang Pusoy, na kilala din bilang Chinese Poker, ay patuloy na sumisikat sa buong mundo, kumukuha ng interes ng mga manlalaro mula sa iba’t ibang bansa. Ang mga online platforms ay nagpapadali sa pag-access nito. Ang online version nito ay lubos na nagpasigla ng interes sa mga baguhan at casual players, na nagdulot ng diskusyon kung alin ang mas madali: ang paglalaro ng Pusoy one-on-one o sa multiplayer settings.
Habang nailipat sa digital platforms ang Pusoy, napakahalaga na maunawaan ang mga format nito upang mapahusay ang karanasan sa laro. Malaking epekto ang bilang ng mga kalaban pagdating sa istilo ng laro, antas ng kahirapan, at ang ganap na gameplay dynamics. Ang mga platforms tulad ng GameZone ay nagbibigay ng angkop na espasyo para sa mga manlalaro na masubukan ang parehong one-on-one at multiplayer Pusoy, na akma para sa iba’t ibang klase ng players depende sa kanilang kasanayan at kagustuhan.
Mga Bentahe ng One-on-One Pusoy
Simpleng Gameplay
Sa one-on-one Pusoy in English, dalawa lang ang naglalaban—isang manlalaro at isang kalaban. Dahil dito, mas madali ang bawat laban. Ang pokus ng mga manlalaro ay nakatuon lamang sa kanilang sariling 13 cards at sa mga galaw ng kalaban, kaya’t nababawasan ang pagiging komplikado.
Para sa mga baguhan, ideal ang one-on-one matches upang:
- Sanayin ang tamang pagsasaayos ng cards.
- Matutunan ang tamang ranggo ng bawat kamay.
- Magsanay na maiwasan ang mag-foul sa laro.
Ang simpleng gameplay ay nagbibigay ng matibay na pundasyon para sa mas kumplikadong karanasan sa multiplayer matches.
Mga Estratehiya mula sa Pagmamasid
Sa one-on-one matches, mas madaling maunawaan ang istilo ng kalaban dahil limitado lamang ang galaw na kailangan sundan. Maaari mong obserbahan ang mga sumusunod na patterns:
- Konserbatibong pagkakaayos o agresibong strategy.
- Madalas na pagkakamali o overconfidence.
- Labis na pagtuon sa isang grupo ng cards.
Dahil dito, nagkakaroon ng pagkakataon ang mga manlalaro na isaayos ang kanilang estratehiya upang mas epektibong maka-responde sa galaw ng kalaban, partikular kung maglalaro sa competitive platforms tulad ng GameZone.
Mas Mababang Pressure
Dahil one-on-one lamang ang laban, mababawasan ang mental at emotional stress. Walang ibang kalaban na makaka-distract, na nagbibigay ng pagkakataon para sa mga baguhan na matuto nang walang matinding parusa sa kanilang mga pagkakamali. Nagiging stepping stone ito patungo sa mas dynamic na multiplayer matches.
Ang Hamon ng Multiplayer Pusoy
Mas Komplikado at Mas Malalim na Gameplay
Sa Multiplayer Pusoy, madaragdagan ang bilang ng kalaban, kaya mas nagiging komplikado ang laro. Kailangan kalkulahin ng bawat manlalaro ang galaw ng maraming tao at ang pagkakaayos nila ng cards.
Ang ilang hamon ng multiplayer ay:
- Pagbabalanse ng lakas ng cards sa tatlong grupo.
- Pag-iwas sa labis na peligro habang nagiging kompetitibo.
- Pagtatagumpayan ang lahat ng kalaban nang sabay-sabay.
Ang ganitong klase ng gameplay ay nangangailangan ng maingat na pagpaplano, prediksyon, at strategic na pasensiya.
Mas Malakas na Mental Pressure
Mas mataas ang psychological demand sa multiplayer, dahil mabilis ang galawan at mas mahirap manatiling kalmado sa gitna ng mas maraming kalaban. Kabilang dito ang:
- Bilisan ang pagdedesisyon kahit under pressure.
- Paano mananatiling focused sa gitna ng mga distractions.
- Pagkakaroon ng emosyonal na kontrol matapos ang sunod-sunod na talo.
Mas exciting ito para sa mga manlalarong gusto ng matinding hamon at pagmamalasakit sa estratehiya.
GameZone: Ang Bagong Tahanan ng Modern Pusoy
Ang GameZone online ay isang kahanga-hangang platform para sa mga naglalaro ng Pusoy in English. Nagbibigay ito ng opsyon para sa parehong one-on-one at multiplayer matches, akma para sa kahit anong antas ng kasanayan.
Mga feature ng GameZone:
- Madaling English interface para sa user-friendly na gameplay.
- Real-player matches imbes na kalaban ay bots.
- Mga tool para sa responsible play, tulad ng time reminder at spending limits.
Pagtatagal ng Pamanang Pusoy
Ang Pusoy card game in English ay nagpalawak ng abot nito sa mas maraming players mula sa iba’t ibang bahagi ng mundo habang pinapanatili ang tradisyunal nitong charm. Sa pamamagitan ng mga modernong platform tulad ng GameZone, mananatiling buhay at progresibo ang Pusoy, nakakabighani pa rin sa lahat ng antas ng manlalaro—mula sa casual enjoyment hanggang sa competitive challenges.
Mula sa maingat na pag-aayos ng mga cards hanggang sa pag-master ng estratehiya, ang Pusoy ay isang laro na nananatiling relevant habang ipinapakita ang masalimuot nitong gameplay dynamics na puno ng kultura at inobasyon.
Features
Rob Reiner asked the big questions. His death leaves us searching for answers.
Can men and women just be friends? Can you be in the revenge business too long? Why don’t you just make 10 louder and have that be the top number on your amp?
All are questions Rob Reiner sought to answer. In the wake of his and his wife’s unexpected deaths, which are being investigated as homicides, it’s hard not to reel with questions of our own: How could someone so beloved come to such a senseless end? How can we account for such a staggering loss to the culture when it came so prematurely? How can we juggle that grief and our horror over the violent murder of Jews at an Australian beach, gathered to celebrate the first night of Hanukkah, and still light candles of our own?
The act of asking may be a way forward, just as Rob Reiner first emerged from sitcom stardom by making inquiries.
In This is Spinal Tap, his first feature, he played the role of Marty DiBergi, the in-universe director of the documentary about the misbegotten 1982 U.S. concert tour of the eponymous metal band. He was, in a sense, culminating the work of his father, Carl Reiner, who launched a classic comedy record as the interviewer of Mel Brooks’ 2,000 Year Old Man. DiBergi as played by Reiner was a reverential interlocutor — one might say a fanboy — but he did take time to query Nigel Tufnell as to why his amp went to 11. And, quoting a bad review, he asked “What day did the Lord create Spinal Tap, and couldn’t he have rested on that day too?”
But Reiner had larger questions to mull over. And in this capacity — not just his iconic scene at Katz’s Deli in When Harry Met Sally or the goblin Yiddishkeit of Miracle Max in The Princess Bride — he was a fundamentally Jewish director.
Stand By Me is a poignant meditation on death through the eyes of childhood — it asks what we remember and how those early experiences shape us. The Princess Bride is a storybook consideration of love — it wonders at the price of seeking or avenging it at all costs. A Few Good Men is a trenchant, cynical-for-Aaron Sorkin, inquest of abuse in the military — how can it happen in an atmosphere of discipline.
In his public life, Reiner was an activist. He asked how he could end cigarette smoking. He asked why gay couples couldn’t marry like straight ones. He asked what Russia may have had on President Trump. This fall, with the FCC’s crackdown on Jimmy Kimmel, he asked if he would soon be censored. He led with the Jewish question of how the world might be repaired.
Guttingly, in perhaps his most personal project, 2015’s Being Charlie, co-written by his son Nick he wondered how a parent can help a child struggling with addiction. (Nick was questioned by the LAPD concerning his parents’ deaths and was placed under arrest.)
Related
None of the questions had pat answers. Taken together, there’s scarcely a part of life that Reiner’s filmography overlooked, including the best way to end it, in 2007’s The Bucket List.
Judging by the longevity of his parents, both of whom lived into their 90s, it’s entirely possible Reiner had much more to ask of the world. That we won’t get to see another film by him, or spot him on the news weighing in on the latest democratic aberration, is hard to swallow.
Yet there is some small comfort in the note Reiner went out on. In October, he unveiled Spinal Tap II: The Beginning of the End, a valedictory moment in a long and celebrated career.
Reiner once again returned to the role of DiBergi. I saw a special prescreening with a live Q&A after the film. It was the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. I half-expected Reiner to break character and address political violence — his previous film, God & Country, was a documentary on Christian Nationalism.
But Reiner never showed up — only Marty DiBergi, sitting with Nigel Tuffnell (Christopher Guest), David St. Hubbins (Michael McKean) and Derek Smalls (Harry Shearer) at Grauman’s Chinese Theater in Los Angeles. The interview was broadcast to theaters across the country, with viewer-submitted questions like “What, in fact, did the glove from Smell the Glove smell like?” (Minty.) And “Who was the inspiration for ‘Big Bottom?’” (Della Reese.)
Related
- Actor-Director Rob Reiner dies at 78
- Carl Reiner On Judaism, Atheism And The ‘Monster’ In The White House
- Mandy Patinkin On His Favorite ‘Princess Bride’ Quote
DiBergi had one question for the audience: “How did you feel about the film?”
The applause was rapturous, but DiBergi still couldn’t get over Nigel Tuffnell’s Marshall amp, which now stretched beyond 11 and into infinity.
“How can that be?” he asked. “How can you go to infinity? How loud is that?”
There’s no limit, Tuffnell assured him. “Why should there be a limit?”
Reiner, an artist of boundless curiosity and humanity, was limitless. His remit was to reason why. He’ll be impossible to replace, but in asking difficult questions, we can honor him.
The post Rob Reiner asked the big questions. His death leaves us searching for answers. appeared first on The Forward.