Features
Former Winnipegger Chuck Lazer looks back on satisfying career in television production
By MYRON LOVE It was French filmmaker Francois Truffaut’s 1973 film, “Day for Night”, that inspired former Winnipegger Chuck Lazer to pursue a career in show business.
“The movie was about a film producer making a movie,” the older brother of current Jewish Federation of Winnipeg President Joel Lazer recalls. “After watching that film, I determined that was what I wanted to do.”
Over a career in television production spanning 40 years, Chuck Lazer has written scripts for two dozen Canadian series – the best known of which may be “Danger Bay”, “Max Glick”, “North of 60”, “Avonlea”, “When Calls the Heart”. As well he has served as producer for a number of series including “Flash Forward”, “Thrill of a Lifetime”, “The Odyssey”, “BeastMaster”, “The Lost World” “Nothing Too good for a Cowboy” –which was based on a made-for-television movie he also produced – and, most recently, “When Calls the Heart”.
Among the actors he has had the pleasure of working with are Yannick Bisson (star of the long-running “Murdoch Mysteries”, (Winnipeg-born) Ted Atherton, Sarah Chalke (whose subsequent credits include starring roles in “Scrubs” and “Roseanne”, also Ryan Reynolds and Ryan Gosling, both of whom went on to major movie careers in the United States.
“Because of limited budgets for Canadian productions, we get many younger actors at the beginning of their careers before they became household names,” he notes.
“Working on a television production, the hours are insane,” Lazer observes. “You put in 20-hours days. But it’s more like play than work. And you are collaborating with a lot of wonderfully talented people who share your passion for telling stories. It doesn’t get any better than that.”
Writing for television however is not where Chuck Lazer saw his life’s journey going when the Peretz School and West Kildonan Collegiate graduate left Winnipeg after high school in 1962 to attend Princeton University.
“Being accepted to Princeton was an opportunity that I couldn’t pass up,” he recalls.
Once he began studying Mathematics and Physics at Princeton, he quickly realized that Science was not for him. He switched to Sociology, eventually earning a Ph.D. in the field from the University of Michigan, following which he taught for some years at the University of Victoria.
While he enjoyed teaching Sociology, he notes, he aspired to a much larger audience. After viewing “Day For Night”, he and his wife at the time moved to Toronto where he began his first job in television production in “craft services”, the department in film, television and video production which provides cast and crew with snacks, drinks and other assistance.
“It was a way for me to get my foot in the door, spend time with actors and directors and observe them at work,” he explains.
From there, he went to work for a long-running CTV series called “Thrill of a Lifetime” in which regular Canadians were given a chance to live out their fantasiesl. He served as co-producer and occasional writer for the series.
After that, he recalls, the pickings were slim for many years.
“I kept busy writing,” he says.
It was finally in 1990 that his career as producer and writer took off – including writing for the CBC series “Max Glick” and serving as executive story editor for several episodes. “Max Glick” was based on a novel by Morley Torgov about a barmitzvah-aged boy living in a community in northwestern Ontario. After that came “Danger Bay”, “Avonlea”, “The Odyssey” and the TV movie “Nothing Too good for a Cowboy”. His most recent production, “When Calls the Heart”, was broadcast in 2017.
Lazer says that he decided to become a producer because he wanted more control over his stories. Twenty-five years ago, he formed a partnership with David Barlow who, In the mid-1990s, acquired the rights to “Nothing Too Good for a Cowboy” based on the memoirs of long-ago Western rancher Rich Hobson. The partners turned the book first into a movie – which debuted as a TV movie in 1998 – and followed up with a TV series for CBC, which ran for 26 episodes.
Asked what is involved in being a producer, Lazer responds that it is relatively straightforward. “Everything,” he responds. “David and I were in charge of all the creative aspects – developing the story, hiring staff, casting the roles, making sure production was running smoothly. We partnered with producers and studios on the financial side.”
In 2003, he notes, his achievements in the television industry were recognized with the presentation of the Margaret Colliers Award – a lifetime achievement award presented by the Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television to a Canadian writer for an outstanding body of work in film or television.
(His collaborator, David Barlow, was presented with the award a couple of years earlier.)
Since his one-year stint as “When Calls the Heart” supervising producer came to an end in 2017, Lazer says that “his phone has stopped ringing” when it comes to filmmaking. Ten years ago, he and his wife, Dacia Moss, moved back to Victoria – where they met – and he took up playing the bass. He also spends his time playing golf.
While he says that he is still available if something in filmmaking comes up, he is, in the meantime, enjoying semi-retirement.
Uncategorized
Volatility, Hit Frequency, and RTP: Why the Number Casinos Advertise Is the Least Useful One
The return to player percentage looks clean as a casino data point. It gives players a neat number, usually around 94% to 97% for many online slots, and that number feels easy to compare. A 96.5% game appears better than a 95.2% game. The problem starts when players treat RTP as a forecast for their next 50 spins or one evening.
You may find the RTP listed on slot pages on a leading online casino in Ontario, but the number only tells part of the story. Two games can share the same RTP and create different sessions: one may return small wins often, while the other may drain a balance before one bonus round changes everything.
The RTP Trap
Return to player (RTP) measures the theoretical share of total wagers a game returns across a very large number of rounds. In plain terms, a 96% RTP slot returns about $96 for every $100 wagered in the long run. That does not mean one player who deposits $100 should expect $96 back.
The trap sits in the word “theoretical.” RTP comes from the game’s math model. It works across huge samples, not personal sessions. A player can finish far above that percentage, far below it, or with nothing left after a short run of poor results.
Is it useless then? No, RTP can still help. It gives a baseline cost of play. Lower-RTP games cost more on average than higher-RTP games. Still, once a game passes a reasonable threshold, the next question matters more: how does it distribute that return?
Hit Frequency: The Number That Shapes Session Feel
Hit frequency tells you how often a game produces a winning outcome. This often misleads players because any win can count. A spin that returns $0.10 on a $1 bet may still count as a hit, even though the player lost $0.90 in real terms.
A game can feel active because symbols connect often, sounds play, and the screen keeps celebrating small returns. The balance may still fall. In many modern slots, “win” does not always mean profit on the spin.
Hit frequency answers one practical question: how much silence can you tolerate? Some players dislike long dry spells. Others accept quieter sessions because they chase bonus rounds or larger payouts.
The educational site Get Gambling Facts gives a useful distinction: RTP concerns the percentage of money returned over time, while hit frequency concerns how often a machine stops on a winning combination.
Volatility: The Risk Label Players Need More Often
Volatility, also called variance, describes how unevenly a game pays. Low-volatility games tend to return smaller amounts more often. High-volatility games hold more value in rare events: bonus rounds, premium symbols, multipliers, or jackpots.
Here is where RTP becomes less useful on its own:
- A 96% low-volatility slot may give modest returns and longer play from the same balance.
- A 96% high-volatility slot may burn through funds quickly unless the player hits a strong feature.
- A progressive jackpot game may look exciting, but it often places more value on rare top prizes.
The same RTP can hide very different risk profiles. Players who ignore volatility often blame the casino or the game when the session follows its math design.
Why the Same RTP Can Feel So Different
Picture two slots with 96% RTP. Slot A pays small wins on many spins, has a modest top prize, and rarely creates dramatic balance swings. Slot B pays less often but offers a large max win and volatile bonus rounds. The advertised return matches, but the experience does not.
Slot A may suit a player who wants a slower bankroll drop and more regular feedback. Slot B suits someone who accepts sharper losses in exchange for a shot at a heavier payout.
A Better Way to Read a Slot Page
Most slot pages give players more clues than they notice. The trick is to read the details together rather than chase the highest percentage.
Start with RTP. If two games look similar, the higher number has better long-term value. Then check volatility. If the game uses terms such as high, very high, or extreme variance, lower your bet size or expect shorter sessions. Next, look at the paytable. A huge max win usually means the game saves a lot of its value for rare outcomes.
A sensible pre-play check looks like this:
- RTP: What is the average long-term return?
- Volatility: How rough can the session become?
- Hit frequency: How often will the game show any wins?
- Paytable: Where does most value sit?
To Conclude
Casinos advertise RTP because it looks objective, tidy, and easy to rank. Players should read it, but they should not give it more authority than it deserves. For long sessions, volatility may matter more than a small RTP difference. For comfort, hit frequency may explain the feel better than the payback rate.
Features
They Deserve the Very Best”: The Doctors Bringing Specialist Care to Holocaust Survivors at Home
Features
The Popularity of Simpler Slot Games in 2026: Review From Casino Online CrazyTower Experts
Online casinos now fill their libraries with numerous video slots that have dozens of functions, long bonus rounds, complex mechanics, and so on. Interestingly, despite this huge range of modern options, many Canadian visitors at sites like Casino Online CrazyTower here https://crazytower.com/ca/ no longer want complicated gameplay that requires constant attention and long explanations.
Simpler slots now attract a wider audience because they save time and create faster sessions. So, let’s figure out why this change happened and reasons for the popularity of simpler machines.
Why Many Players Are Returning to Basic Gameplay
Modern websites like Casino Online CrazyTower pushed complex video slots for years, but many people now prefer classic formats again. Simple gameplay has fewer interruptions and is simpler in terms of budgeting, which is important when you gamble for fun.
These are a few potential reasons explain why simpler slots became popular again in 2026:
- Faster rounds. Symbols appear quickly, and rounds continue without long animations or extended bonus sequences.
- Easier controls. Most classic slots have simple menus and familiar layouts that don’t confuse new visitors.
- Smaller feature lists. Simple slots usually have standard wilds, scatters, and multipliers instead of dozens of random mechanics.
- Better session flow. People spend more time on gameplay instead of reading explanations about symbols and special functions.
- Lower visual pressure. Simpler slots use calmer designs and shorter effects that don’t overload attention.
Classic gameplay also suits mobile devices better because shorter rounds work well on smaller screens. Plus, many visitors now prefer games that start instantly and explain their mechanics within seconds.
Features That Make Simpler Slots Appealing
Simple machines at Casino Online CrazyTower and similar websites continue to attract attention because they have a high gameplay speed. Many classic titles also replicate older casino machines that people already know from physical casinos.
However, these aren’t the only factors that attract gamblers. So, check out this list:
- Short bonus rounds. Free spins and multipliers finish quickly instead of interrupting gameplay for several minutes.
- Common and standard paylines. Traditional layouts help people understand payouts without long explanations.
- Faster loading times. Simpler graphics reduce waiting time on phones, tablets, and older computers.
- Stable gameplay pace. Long cutscenes and constant pop-up notifications don’t interrupt the session.
- Traditional themes. Fruit symbols, bars, sevens, and classic casino designs still attract large audiences.
- Smaller menus. Important information appears immediately without complicated tabs or hidden sections.
Modern video slots often contain too many mechanics in a single game. Developers now combine expanding reels, random modifiers, mission systems, tournaments, and multiple bonus levels in one title. Many visitors lose interest because gameplay turns repetitive and overloaded with constant interruptions.
Compare this to a session when you get results immediately and aren’t interrupted. These still have free spins and even mini risk games, but not as loaded as innovative titles.
Conclusion
Simple slots usually create better replay value because people understand the mechanics immediately. Common and standard gameplay doesn’t cause frustration and allows faster decisions during casino sessions.
Many classic slots also function better during short breaks because rounds finish quickly without long bonus interruptions. That’s why simpler slots became popular again at many casinos, including Casino Online CrazyTower and such.
