A pro-Hamas group placed a shocking display targeting Jews and law enforcement on the grounds of the University of British Columbia (UBC) during the early hours of Tuesday morning.

“Pigs off campus,” said a large banner which People’s University for Gaza at UBC (PUG) tacked to the double gates leading to the private residence of university president Benoit-Antoine Bacon. Next to the banner, the group staked on the finials of the structure the severed head of a pig. Before leaving the area, they photographed their work and issued a statement explaining its motivation on Instagram.

“UBC will not know peace until we get Palestine back, piece by piece,” PUG said. “Pigs off campus is one of our demands. KKKanada and ‘Isra-hell’ are both shared violent settler colonial projects built on the removal of indigenous peoples from their land with the use of police forces.”

The statement went on to rail against Bacon for cooperating with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, which it accused of murdering “indigenous youth,” to increase campus security. It also cited as a grievance the university’s hosting of students who had served in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

“We remind him this morning this morning and every morning that these tactics do not intimidate us,” PUG continued. “To all those … starting their classes today, we ask you to take more action this year. Find your comrades, wear your keffiyehs everyday, learn beyond these classroom walls, and shut this campus down.”

The incident prompted a rebuke from Honest Reporting Canada (HRC), a nonprofit organization which promotes media fairness and accountability.

“Horrific Jew hated last night at University of British Columbia, as Jewish students were ‘welcomed’ with a ‘Pigs of campus’ sign and a severed pig’s head,” it said. “Hey UBC and UBC President [Bacon], what are you doing to protect your Jewish students on campus from this open Jew hatred?”

UBC has seen its share of antisemitic incidents before. In 2021, mezuzahs, prayer scrolls hung on the doors of Jewish residences, were twice stolen or vandalized. Earlier this year, pro-Hamas activists waged a campaign to expel Hillel from campus, arguing that doing so would advance the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israe. Other years saw the posting of neo-Nazi propaganda and swastika graffiti, and according to local media outlets, pro-Hamas students and faculty have perpetrated unrelenting abuse of anyone perceived as being a Jewish supporter of Israel, a problem that the university has been slow to address and which earlier this year led to the resignation of a family medicine professor who taught and conducted research there for three decades.

Other Canadian universities have allegedly failed to deter or punish anti-Zionist hatred.

In May, Jewish students attending Concordia University in Montreal told The Algemeiner that they have been left to fend for themselves when their anti-Zionist classmates resort to assault and harassment to make their point. No single incident, they said, evinced their alleged abandonment by school officials more than one on March 12 in which Jewish students were trapped in the school’s Hillel office while members of the anti-Zionist club Supporting Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR), concealing their faces with keffiyehs and surgical masks, banged on its windows and doors and stomped on the floor of the room above it.

When campus security officers arrived on the scene, they refused to punish the offenders and accused Jewish students of instigating the incident because they had filmed what transpired.

“We only filmed because they were harassing us, for evidence, and we didn’t feel safe,” Chana Leah Natanblut told The Algemeiner during an interview. “Security obviously told them to disperse and that they couldn’t act that way, but they didn’t say what would happen and it felt almost as if they had taken their side. Who’s to say they won’t do it again? What kind of message does it send to do nothing about it?”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post ‘Pigs Off Campus’: Canadian Anti-Zionist Group Sends Chilling Message to Jews, Police first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced terrorism charges against several top leaders of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas for orchestrating the Oct. 7 massacre across southern Israel.

The DOJ revealed in an unsealed complaint on Tuesday that six key Hamas leaders have been issued charges of terrorism, murder conspiracy, and sanctions-evasion for their roles in the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks. Ismail Haniyeh, Yahya Sinwar, Mohammad Al-Masri, Marwan Issa, Khaled Meshaal, and Ali Baraka played central roles in planning and perpetrating the slaughter of 1,200 people and abduction of 251 others as hostages on Oct. 7 when Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists invaded Israel from neighboring Gaza, according to the DOJ.

“The Justice Department has charged Yahya Sinwar and other senior leaders of Hamas for financing, directing, and overseeing a decades-long campaign to murder American citizens and endanger the national security of the United States,” US Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement.

“On Oct. 7, Hamas terrorists, led by these defendants, murdered nearly 1,200 people, including over 40 Americans, and kidnapped hundreds of civilians,” Garland continued. “This weekend, we learned that Hamas murdered an additional six people they had kidnapped and held captive for nearly a year, including Hersh Goldberg-Polin, a 23-year-old Israeli American. We are investigating Hersh’s murder, and each and every one of Hamas’s brutal murders of Americans, as an act of terrorism. The charges unsealed today are just one part of our effort to target every aspect of Hamas’ operations. These actions will not be our last.”

In the unsealed complaint, the DOJ explained how Iran, which US intelligence agencies have repeatedly labeled the world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism, has helped empower Hamas to commit acts of violence against Israel. The department outlined how Iran and its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), have materially “supported, supplied, and trained” the Hamas terrorist group. The DOJ argued that Hamas has played a critical role in Iran’s “global and regional ambitions of damaging, weakening, and ultimately destroying both the United States and Israel.”

“The IRGC has provided Hamas, among other things, rockets and technical assistance necessary to build rockets and tens of millions of dollars in annual funding for Hamas’ terror wing, including through cryptocurrency payments.”

The complaint alleged that Hamas received support from Hezbollah, another Iran-backed Islamist terror group, which operates out of Lebanon. 

“Hamas’s leadership has acknowledged the instrumental role that support from the government of Iran and from Hezbollah” played in its ability to carry out the Oct. 7 massacre, according to the DOJ.

In the immediate aftermath of the Oct. 7 attacks, Hezbollah launched an offensive on Israel’s northern border, firing rockets, missiles, and drones on Israeli communities from southern Lebanon almost daily. The barrages have forced tens of thousands of families to flee to other areas in the country. 

Iran’s deployment of Hamas and Hezbollah, the DOJ argued, are part of the Iranian regime’s “years-long strategy to encircle Israel with armed proxy groups, instigate turmoil, and promote acts of terrorism.”

Haniyeh was Hamas’s top leader and the head of its political bureau until he was killed in an explosion in Iran on July 31. While Hamas and Iran have blamed Israel for the assassination, Jerusalem has neither confirmed nor denied being behind the killing.

Sinwar, who had been Hamas’s chief in Gaza, was picked to succeed Haniyeh as the terrorist group’s overall leader. Israel has said that Sinwar is “marked for death” as the architect of the Oct. 7 attack, which was orchestrated along with Al-Masri, the Hamas military wing commander better known Muhammad Deif, who was killed by the Israeli military in July.

According to reports, Sinwar is alive in southern Gaza and, to deter being targeted by Israeli forces, has surrounded himself with hostages kidnapped on Oct. 7.

The DOJ has charged the six Hamas leaders with “conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization resulting in death,” “conspiring to provide material support for acts of terrorism resulting in death,” “conspiring to murder US nationals outside the United States,” “conspiring to bomb a place of public use resulting in death,” and “conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction resulting in death.” Each of these charges carry a maximum penalty of life in prison or death. 

In addition, the DOJ has handed the terrorists with charges of “conspiring to finance terrorism” and “conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.” Each of these carries maximum penalties of up to 20 years in prison. 

“From the moment Hamas launched its horrific attack on Oct. 7, the FBI has been dedicated to identifying and charging those responsible for these heinous crimes,” FBI Director Christopher Wray said in a statement. “The FBI has and will continue to relentlessly investigate these attacks on civilians, including Americans. Hamas is a foreign terrorist organization with a long history of violence, and the group’s actions have resulted in increased terrorism threats in the US and against American interests throughout the world. Countering terrorism remains our number one priority, and our work continues.”

The post US Justice Department Charges Hamas Leaders for Oct. 7 Massacre in Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

The oversight board for Facebook’s parent company announced on Wednesday that the anti-Israel slogan “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is not hate speech or a call for violence, leading to outrage from groups dedicated to combating antisemitism and other forms of bigotry.

Meta’s board posted on its official website that the popular rallying cry for anti-Israel activists did not break Meta’s “rules on Hate Speech, Violence and Incitement or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals” and therefore should not lead to content removal.

Specifically, Meta said it considered three separate uses of the phrase in Facebook posts and found they “contain contextual signs of solidarity with Palestinians — but no language calling for violence or exclusion.” The board added that the three cases did not “glorify or even refer to Hamas,” the Palestinian terrorist group that rules Gaza and is designated as “dangerous” by Meta.

“In upholding Meta’s decisions to keep up the content, the majority of the board notes the phrase has multiple meanings and is used by people in various ways and with different intentions,” the announcement stated. “A minority, however, believes that because the phrase appears in the 2017 Hamas charter and given the October 7 attacks, its use in a post should be presumed to constitute glorification of a designated entity, unless there are clear signals to the contrary.”

Despite Meta’s conclusion, many observers have argued that the slogan “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” has been widely interpreted as a call for the destruction of the Jewish state, which is located between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.

Some Jewish and anti-hate groups lambasted Meta for its decision, arguing that the rallying cry is a form of incitement and presents an implied call for violence against Jews and Israelis.

The Anti-Defamation League, for example, rejected the company’s “short-sighted decision,” arguing the phrase “calls to dismantle Israel, including through the removal of Jews from their ancestral homeland.”

“‘From the river to the sea’” is an antisemitic charge denying the Jewish people’s right to self-determination,” the ADL posted on X/Twitter. “This rallying cry, enshrined in the charter of Hamas, has long been used by anti-Israel voices, including supporters of terrorist organizations like Hamas and PFLP [Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine], which seek Israel’s destruction through violent means.”

The ADL concluded, “Usage of this phrase has the effect of making members of the Jewish and pro-Israel community feel unsafe and ostracized, and we call on Meta to recognize the harm this phrase poses to Jewish communities worldwide. This decision continues the pattern of supreme indifference to online hate and harassment that has long been the hallmark of Meta’s leadership.”

The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM) expressed similar sentiments on Wednesday.

“‘From the River to the Sea’ is a slogan created with the sole vision of destroying the national homeland of the Jewish people,” CAM CEO Sacha Roytman said in a statement. “It is genocidal in intent and meaning, and is not a legitimate political or ideological vision, because it targets the one Jewish state and its inhabitants for destruction.”

Roytman went on to argue that the Meta board “appears to have special rules for Jews and the Jewish state because they seem to always come down on the side of antisemites and give them a benefit of the doubt that they would dare not give any other racist or hate group. They have given a green light for incitement to genocide.”

The oversight board’s decision came after Meta in July removed its ban on the use of the Arabic word “shaheed,” or “martyr” in English, after a year-long review.

That same month, Meta announced an update to its moderation policy regarding posts that use the word “Zionists” as a proxy to target Jews or Israelis in hate speech. Meta said it would begin removing posts that use “Zionists” to refer to Jews and Israelis in harmful and derogatory ways.

The post Anti-Hate Groups Blast Meta Oversight Board for Declaring ‘From the River to the Sea’ Not Hate Speech, Incitement first appeared on Algemeiner.com.