Connect with us

RSS

Reuters Uses Coverage of Gaza Ceasefire Deal to Reframe the Israel-Hamas War

Families and supporters of Israeli hostages kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas, gather to demand a deal that will bring back all the hostages held in Gaza, outside a meeting between hostage representatives and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in Jerusalem, January 14, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ammar Awad

News coverage is often described as “the first draft of history.” And in the case of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal, nothing is more true.

As media outlets rushed to summarize the conflict — some successfully and some appallingly — Reuters excelled in the latter category.

The news agency used the Gaza ceasefire deal as an excuse to reframe the entire narrative of the Israel-Hamas war in a way that subtly justified the existence and actions of Hamas — an internationally-designated terror group.

Reuters’ goal was achieved by using biased terminology and one-sided background paragraphs.

And it should come as no surprise given the agency’s Gaza reporters have been exposed by HonestReporting for their cozy relations with Hamas.

Biased Terminology

First, Reuters used the word “detainees” to describe the Palestinian prisoners, some of whom have been jailed for years over terror offenses and violence:

Such wording whitewashes the perpetrators of horrific murders and minimizes their crimes. And the fact that this wording is usually used to describe political detainees further contributes to this distortion.

The word “detainees” also hides the fact that, under Israeli law, they are still guaranteed conditions that do not harm their health or dignity — rights that hostages in Hamas captivity have been deprived of.

But that’s only one strategy used by Reuters to subtly shill for terrorists.

One-Sided Information

The second strategy is the sneaky one-sided editing of background paragraphs or sentences, usually referred to as “boilerplates.”

These have an almost “holy” status in news agency reporting on contested issues. They set the narrative and therefore need to be carefully phrased to include the most balanced background information from all sides.

Yet Reuters’ initial story on the Gaza ceasefire deal included the following summary of the war, which clearly didn’t take into account the Israeli victims:

Even more disturbing is the fact that an editor apparently noticed the flaw, because the phrasing was later changed to: “15 months of bloodshed that devastated the Palestinian enclave” instead of “15 months of conflict that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.” But it still sounds like some lives are more equal than others to Reuters.

Another example is the biased editing of a background paragraph that set the narrative about what triggered the war — the October 7 massacre.

What has always been described as a breach of the Israel-Gaza border was subtly changed to the breaking of “security barriers,” and the word “border” was removed — creating the impression that the terrorists may have acted legitimately.

This was done in a story about Gaza celebrations by the agency’s veteran Gaza reporter, Nidal al-Mughrabi (who is currently based in Cairo).

But the main Reuters report about the ceasefire agreement, by additional non-Gazan reporters and a larger crew of editors, includes a more accurate boilerplate, with the words “border-area communities”:

This appears to prove the bias of the reporter/editor who quietly deleted the word “border” in the first case. But the paragraph in its entirety is still flawed because it leads with Israel’s “invasion” and not with Hamas atrocities, and also makes the 1,200 victims of October 7 look like they were mostly soldiers.

Cozy with Hamas

Sadly, all of this makes sense because prominent Reuters staffers in Gaza, including al-Mughrabi, have had unethical ties with Hamas for quite some time. So they would not want to publish anything that might risk this relationship.

But these tainted ties, exposed by HonestReporting last September, ring louder now: Our exposure unveiled how al-Mughrabi and his colleagues attended a Hamas event for journalists in 2017, where awards were given by none other than Khalil Al-Hayya — current Hamas leader who promised another October 7 after the ceasefire deal was signed:

Reuters’ Nidal al-Mughrabi (circled) sitting with colleagues behind Hamas’ Khalil Al-Hayya, at a 2017 Hamas event in Gaza.

Reuters’ Mohammed Jadallah Salem receiving an award from Hamas’ Khalil Al-Hayya, at a 2017 Hamas event in Gaza.

In other words, Reuters’ reframing of the narrative cannot be fixed without some serious reshuffling of their compromised Gaza team.

But that won’t happen if the agency wants access to figures like Al-Hayya.

Thus, a vicious circle is created– from the tainted Gaza team to newsroom editors who defer to a distorted narrative that excuses the terrorists out of fear or bias.

The misleading terminology and one-sidedness, particularly in huge stories like the Gaza ceasefire deal, are the subtle tools by which this circle is kept intact so that the first draft of history serves the “right” side.

HonestReporting is a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

The post Reuters Uses Coverage of Gaza Ceasefire Deal to Reframe the Israel-Hamas War first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Anti-Israel Singer Kehlani’s NYC Concert Gets Cancelled After Mayor Faces Pressure

Kehlani walking on the red carpet during the 67th Grammy Awards held at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, CA on Feb. 2, 2025. Photo: Elyse Jankowski/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect

An upcoming New York City concert featuring Israel-hating, American singer Kehlani was canceled late Monday after organizers faced mounting pressure from New York City Mayor Eric Adams.

The webpage for the “Pride With Kehlani” benefit concert has also removed from the website of the City Parks Foundation. The privately-funded non-profit organization was hosting the performance, set for June 26 in Central Park, as part of its SummerStage festival series and in celebration of June being Pride Month. The concert was being produced and presented by Live Nation, which reportedly selected Kehlani for the performance.

SummerStage released a statement on Monday explaining its decision to call off Kehlani’s performance. According to the statement, the mayor’s office contacted concert organizers and expressed concerns about “safety and security issues” at the event, especially in light of Cornell University’s recent decision to cancel a performance by Kehlani, “as well as security demands in Central Park and throughout the City for other Pride events during that same time period.”

“We strongly and emphatically believe in artistic expression of all kinds. However, the safety and security of our guests and artists is the utmost importance and in light of these concerns, the concert has been cancelled,” SummerStage said. “SummerStage is proud to be a platform for artists from around the world to perform and make arts accessible for all New Yorkers in their neighborhood parks. While artists may choose to express their own opinions, their views may not necessarily be representative of the festival. SummerStage events are intended to bring together all sectors of the New York City community and we look forward to welcoming more guests throughout the summer.”

Mayor Adams’ administration also threatened to pull the licenses for all SummerStage shows if Kehlani’s concert was not canceled, according to a letter sent to the City Parks Foundation that was obtained by New York Post.

Kehlani released a music video last year that opens with the message “Long live the Intifada,” a phrase that incites violence against Israel and the Jewish community. She has attended pro-Palestinian rallies, accused Israel of genocide, and shared numerous anti-Israel and anti-Zionist posts on social media. In one Instagram post, she wrote: “Dismantle Israel. Eradicate Zionism.” She also shared on social media a post that called for Israel to be removed off the map and replaced with “Palestine.” Kehlani recently claimed that she is not antisemitic.

“I am not antisemitic, nor anti-Jew. I am anti-genocide. I am anti-the-actions-of-the-Israeli-government,” she stated in a video posted on Instagram and TikTok.

Congressman Ritchie Torres, who pushed Mayor Adams to take action and have Kehlani’s Central Park concert canceled, applauded the move by SummerStage to call off the show. “Antisemitism becomes unacceptable only when we, as a society, have the courage to reject it—clearly, consistently, and without compromise,” he wrote on X.

SummerStage is the city’s largest free outdoor performing arts festival. It presents more than 80 free and benefit concerts each summer.

Kehlani has not publicly responded to the cancellation of her New York City concert.

The post Anti-Israel Singer Kehlani’s NYC Concert Gets Cancelled After Mayor Faces Pressure first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

New Study Exposes Antisemitism in University Medical Centers

Illustrative Pro-Hamas protesters in Washington, DC, USA, on April 5, 2025. Photo: Robyn Stevens Brody/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect.

Antisemitism in academic medical centers located on college campuses is fostering noxious environments which deprive Jewish healthcare professionals of their civil right to work in spaces free from discrimination and hate, according to a new study by the StandWithUs Data & Analytics Department.

“Academia today is increasingly cultivating an environment which is hostile to Jews, as well as members of other religious and ethnic groups,” StandWithUs director of data and analytics and study co-author, Alexandra Fishman said on Monday in a press release. “Academic institutions should be upholding the integrity of scholarship, prioritizing civil discourse, rather than allowing bias or personal agendas to guide academic culture.”

Titled “Antisemitism in American Healthcare: The Role of Workplace Environment,” the study includes survey data showing that 62.8 percent of Jewish healthcare professionals employed by campus-based medical center reported experiencing antisemitism, a far higher rate than those working in private practice and community hospitals. Fueling the rise in hate, it added, were repeated failures of DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives to educate workers about antisemitism, increasing, the report said, the likelihood of antisemitic activity.

“When administrators and colleagues understand what antisemitism looks like, it clearly correlates with less antisemitism in the workplace,” co-author and Yeshiva University professor Dr. Charles Auerbach said. “Recognition is a powerful tool — institutions that foster awareness create safer, more inclusive environments for everyone.”

Monday’s study is not StandWithUs first contribution to the study of antisemitism in medicine. In December, its Data & Analytics Department published a study which found that nearly 40 percent of Jewish American health-care professionals have encountered antisemitism in the workplace, either as witnesses or victims.

The study included a survey of 645 Jewish health workers, a substantial number of whom said they were subject to “social and professional isolation.” The problem left over one quarter of the survey cohort, 26.4 percent, “feeling unsafe or threatened.”

In some schools, Jewish faculty are speaking out.

In February, the Jewish Faculty Resilience Group (JFrg) at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) accused the institution in an open letter of “ignoring” antisemitism at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine (DGSOM),” charing that its indifference to the matter “continues to encourage more antisemitism.” JFrg added that discrimination at the Geffen medical school has caused demonstrable harm to Jewish students and faculty. Student clubs, it said, are denied recognition for arbitrary reasons; Jewish faculty whose ethnic backgrounds were previously unknown are purged from the payrolls upon being identified as Jews; and anyone who refuses to participate in anti-Zionist events is “intimidated” and pressured.

“DGSOM’s continued silence in the face of a sustained and deeply troubling rise in antisemitism within its own institution is not just complicity — it is a failure of responsibility,” the group said. “Without strong and principled leadership, this dangerous pattern will persist.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post New Study Exposes Antisemitism in University Medical Centers first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Dozens of Former Eurovision Contestants Pressure Organizers to Ban Israel From 2025 Song Contest

Israel’s representative to the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest, Yuval Raphael, holds an Israeli flag in this handout photo obtained by Reuters on Jan. 23, 2025. Photo: “The Rising Star,” Channel Keshet 12/Handout via REUTERS

More than 70 previous contestants of the Eurovision Song Contest on Monday demanded that Israel’s public broadcaster Kan should be banned from the international competition this year because of what they falsely claim is Israel’s “genocide” of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Singers, songwriters, musicians, lyricists and others from across Europe signed an open letter, published by Artists for Palestine UK, that was addressed to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organizes the Eurovision Song Contest. In their letter, the anti-Israel creatives urged the EBU to ban Kan, claiming that it is “complicit in Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza and the decades-long regime of apartheid and military occupation against the entire Palestinian people.”

“We believe in the unifying power of music, which is why we refuse to allow music to be used as a tool to whitewash crimes against humanity,” the open letter stated. The signatories urged EBU to “act now and prevent further discredit and disruption to the festival.”

“Silence is not an option,” they added. “We therefore join together to state that the EBU’s complicity with Israel’s genocide must stop. By continuing to platform the representation of the Israeli state, the EBU is normalizing and whitewashing its crimes … Israel must be excluded from Eurovision.”

The former Eurovision contestants also said that they were “appalled” by the EBU’s decision last year to include Kan in the competition during the Israel-Hamas war.

“The result was disastrous,” they said about the 2024 Eurovision Song Contest. “Rather than acknowledging the widespread criticism and reflecting on its own failures, the EBU responded by doubling down — granting total impunity to the Israeli delegation while repressing other artists and delegations, making the 2024 edition the most politicized, chaotic and unpleasant in the competition’s history.”

During last year’s competition, Israeli singer Eden Golan was booed on stage by anti-Israel audience members, faced death threats, had a anti-Israel Eurovision jury member refuse to give her points, and was forced to conceal her identity outside of the competition for her own safety.

Those who signed Monday’s open letter also accused the EBU of a “double standard” in regards to Israel. They criticized the EBU for expelling Russia’s public broadcaster from the competition in 2022, because of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine that year, but still allowing Israel to participate in the song contest amid the Israel-Hamas war that started after the deadly Hamas terrorist attack on Oct. 7, 2023.

“[It] can’t be one rule for Russia and a completely different rule for Israel. You bomb, you’re out,” said former Eurovision contestant Thea Garrett, who represented Malta in 2010.

“I believe that the Israeli government has been and is inflicting genocide on the people of Palestine and for that reason Israel should be barred from competing in this year’s Eurovision Song Contest,” added Charlie McGettigan, who won the 1994 Eurovision Song Contest for Ireland.

The open letter was signed by creatives from Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Finland, France, Iceland, Malta, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Turkey. The national broadcasters in Iceland, Slovenia and Spain have previously expressed opposition to Israel’s participation in the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest.

The open letter was published the same day that Israel’s Eurovision representative this year, singer Yuval Raphael, traveled to Basel, Switzerland, to compete in the song contest. Raphael, who is a survivor of the Nova Music Festival massacre on Oct. 7, 2023, will compete in the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest with the song “New Day Will Rise,” a ballad written by singer and songwriter Keren Peles. She will perform in the second semi-final on May 15 and, if she advances, will compete in the Eurovision Song Contest grand final on May 17.

The post Dozens of Former Eurovision Contestants Pressure Organizers to Ban Israel From 2025 Song Contest first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News