RSS
Why Northwestern University Needs a New President
Northwestern University president Michael Schill looks on during a US House Education and the Workforce Committee hearing on anti-Israel protests on college campuses, on Capitol Hill in Washington, US, May 23, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades
Northwestern University President Michael Schill has fallen short at the most important part of his job: keeping all students safe.
While testifying before Congress on May 23, President Schill declared, “My number one objective and mandate when parents give me their children, or lend me their children, I need to keep them safe….” Yet his actions do not back up that statement.
President Schill ignored concerns from Jewish students in the months leading up to Oct. 7 that antisemitism on the Evanston, Illinois, campus was rising, and they did not feel safe. He ignored Jewish students who pleaded with him after Oct. 7 to address the unsafe environment that was growing on campus. When an anti-Israel encampment went up — in clear violation of the university’s updated student codes of conduct — his refusal to act essentially allowed Jewish students to be subjected to antisemitic harassment and intimidation on a daily basis without protection.
In what profession is an employee allowed to fail repeatedly at their self-identified “number one objective and mandate,” and still keep their job?
Why should we tolerate a university leader ignoring the pleas of one group of students who say they do not feel safe amid the evidence of rising hate, intolerance, and antisemitism on campus? Simply put, there is no scenario where this should be accepted, and we should not accept President Schill’s behavior.
Jewish students need to feel safe on campus, and to live in an environment free of harassment, intimidation, and threats, and President Schill has missed the mark at every turn. For that reason, it is clear that new leadership at Northwestern is needed.
This is not a position ADL takes lightly. We have a long history — going back decades — of positive engagement with the university. The president himself said in his testimony that he respects ADL’s work, even after we graded his administration’s performance with an “F” for the failure to address antisemitism and to protect Jewish students.
ADL’s CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, is a graduate of Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Business, and always speaks highly of his experiences there as a student. We hoped President Schill’s May 23 testimony would help us and others understand why he did little to address antisemitism on campus before and after Oct. 7, and instead engaged in a policy of appeasement with anti-Israel and antisemitic demonstrators. Sadly, the testimony did the exact opposite. It became clear that time and again, President Schill knowingly prioritized antisemitic rule-breaking over the safety of Jewish students.
President Schill’s testimony revealed hypocrisy, negligence, and platitudes. He testified that he had personally witnessed antisemitism on campus before and after Oct. 7, yet he admitted that no student has been disciplined for violating the university’s codes of conduct. Even more, when pressed by Congress, he refused to say if or when any students or faculty will be held accountable.
He asserted that the codes of conduct were inadequate to address the anti-Israel encampment, while also admitting, “[T]he encampment was breaking our rules.” But even after amending Northwestern’s codes of conduct specifically to prohibit the encampment, he and his administration then failed to enforce the new rules.
President Schill admitted he only appointed one expert on antisemitism to his Advisory Committee on Preventing Antisemitism, and he acted surprised that the Committee could not reach consensus on the definition of antisemitism. Seven Jewish members of the committee, including the executive director of Northwestern’s Hillel, resigned from the Committee in response to the Deering Agreement. During his testimony, President Schill asked for the opportunity to form a new task force to address antisemitism after failing so spectacularly the first time.
President Schill testified that the Deering Agreement was reached at 4 am without consultation with Jewish students or leaders on campus, because such consultation was “impractical.” Yet President Schill somehow had time to consult with Jessica Winegar, a leading international proponent of the BDS movement whom he had appointed to his antisemitism advisory committee. In other words, he only asked those he knew would not push back against his capitulation while ignoring the months of input from Jewish students.
President Schill took credit for a “peaceful” end to the encampment. Yet he allowed the encampment to remain, and he rewarded protestors who had fanned the flames of antisemitism on campus, including with signage celebrating violence against Jews.
Finally, President Schill testified he still does not know who was behind the encampment, yet he somehow reached an agreement with encampment “leaders.”
Do you trust him to do his job and keep Northwestern students safe? We don’t.
New leadership at Northwestern is the first necessary step to restoring trust and confidence with Jewish students on campus, and ensuring they not only feel safe but are safe.
David Goldenberg is Midwest Regional Director of ADL (the Anti-Defamation League).
The post Why Northwestern University Needs a New President first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hezbollah Says Lebanon Move on Army Plan Is ‘Opportunity,’ Urges Israel to Commit to Ceasefire
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and members of the cabinet stand as they attend a cabinet session to discuss the army’s plan to disarm Hezbollah, at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, September 5, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Hezbollah official Mahmoud Qmati told Reuters on Saturday that the group considered Friday’s cabinet session on an army plan to establish a state monopoly on arms “an opportunity to return to wisdom and reason, preventing the country from slipping into the unknown.”
Lebanon’s cabinet on Friday welcomed a plan by the army that would disarm Hezbollah and said the military would begin executing it, without setting a timeframe for implementation and cautioning that the army had limited capabilities.
But it said continued Israeli military operations in Lebanon would hamper the army’s progress. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Lebanese information minister Paul Morcos stopped short of saying the cabinet had formally approved the plan.
Qmati told Reuters that Hezbollah had reached its assessment based on the government’s declaration on Friday that further implementation of a US roadmap on the matter was dependent on Israel’s commitment. He said that without Israel halting strikes and withdrawing its troops from southern Lebanon, Lebanon’s implementation of the plan should remain “suspended until further notice.”
Lebanon’s cabinet last month tasked the army with coming up with a plan that would establish a state monopoly on arms and approved a US roadmap aimed at disarming Hezbollah in exchange for a halt to Israeli military operations in Lebanon.
Qmati said that Hezbollah “unequivocally rejected” those two decisions and expected the Lebanese government to draw up a national defense strategy.
Israel last week signaled it would scale back its military presence in southern Lebanon if the army took action to disarm Hezbollah. Meanwhile, it has continued its strikes, killing four people on Wednesday.
A national divide over Hezbollah’s disarmament has taken center stage in Lebanon since last year’s devastating war with Israel, which upended a power balance long dominated by the Iran-backed Shi’ite Muslim group.
Lebanon is under pressure from the US, Saudi Arabia and Hezbollah’s domestic rivals to disarm the group. But Hezbollah has pushed back, saying it would be a serious misstep to even discuss disarmament while Israel continues its air strikes on Lebanon and occupies swathes of territory in the south.
Hezbollah Secretary General Naim Qassem last month raised the specter of civil war, warning the government against trying to confront the group and saying street protests were possible.
RSS
UK Police Arrest Dozens at Latest Protest for Banned Palestine Action
Demonstrators attend the “Lift The Ban” rally organised by Defend Our Juries, challenging the British government’s proscription of “Palestine Action” under anti-terrorism laws, in Parliament Square, in London, Britain, September 6, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Jasso
British police arrested dozens more people on Saturday under anti-terrorism laws for demonstrating in support of Palestine Action, a pro-Palestinian group banned by the government as a terrorist organization.
Britain banned Palestine Action under anti-terrorism legislation in July after some of its members broke into a Royal Air Force base and damaged military planes. The group accuses Britain’s government of complicity in what it says are Israeli war crimes in Gaza.
Police have arrested hundreds of Palestine Action supporters in recent weeks under anti-terrorism legislation, including over 500 in just one day last month, many of them over the age of 60.
On Saturday, hundreds of demonstrators gathered near parliament in central London to protest against the ban on Saturday, with many holding up signs that said: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”
London’s Metropolitan Police said officers had begun arresting those expressing support for Palestine Action. Police did not say how many arrests were made but a Reuters witness said dozens of people were detained.
Palestine Action’s ban, or proscription, puts the group alongside al-Qaeda and ISIS and makes it a crime to support or belong to the organization, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
“I can be unequivocal, if you show support for Palestine Action – an offense under the Terrorism Act – you will be arrested,” Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ade Adelekan said on Friday. “We have the officer numbers, custody capacity and all other resources to process as many people as is required.”
Human rights groups have criticized Britain’s decision to ban the group as disproportionate and say it limits the freedom of expression of peaceful protesters.
The government has accused Palestine Action of causing millions of pounds worth of criminal damage and says the ban does not prevent other pro-Palestinian protests.
RSS
Macron’s Meeting with American Jewry ‘Won’t Happen’ Amid Palestinian Recognition Drive, Surge in Antisemitism
French President Emmanuel Macron speaks during a press conference in Paris, France, June 12, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Stephane Mahe
i24 News – French President Emmanuel Macron attempted to set up a meeting with American Jewish leaders later this month on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.
i24NEWS has learned that the meeting won’t happen, firstly because Macron was only available for the meeting ahead of the UN General Assembly during Rosh Hashanah, and yet, a person invited to meet with Macron and who has knowledge of the discussions told i24NEWS the sit-down simply wasn’t going to happen, anyway.
“I think the organizations, for the most part, would not have participated,” the person said, adding that AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee would have likely received invitations, among other entities.
“The guy has a 15% popularity rating in France. It’s not our job to help him out,” the person said.
Asked by i24NEWS whether Macron’s push for greater Palestinian state recognition or his lack of action in tackling antisemitism at home led to the stance of organized American Jewry, the person said it’s more of “the climate” which allows one to say ‘Look, the American Jews met with me,’ regardless of the content.”
The person said they are sure, if a meeting would have happened, that everybody in the room would have taken a hard line with Macron, including his “statements on Israel, the failure to respond to antisemitism” and France’s announcement this summer that it will recognize a Palestinian state later this month, and is leading an effort to get more countries to do the same.
But, the person told i24NEWS they are convinced that, in the end, while no final decision actually had to be taken, there was enough pressure that a consensus would have been reached to decline the meeting.
Of the timing of Rosh Hashanah allowing for leadership to not be forced to officially say no to Macron, the person said “G-d saves us every time.”
Another source familiar with the matter noted that it cannot be ruled out that Macron may eventually succeed in arranging a meeting with certain representatives, as the organizations are not a single unified body. However, he is unlikely to be welcomed by the overwhelming majority of groups representing American Jewry.
i24NEWS has also learned that French President Emmanuel Macron explored the possibility of visiting Israel ahead of the convention, but was advised by the Prime Minister’s Office that the timing was inappropriate. The message came as Macron continues to push for recognition of a Palestinian state, a move Israel strongly opposes. Sources further told i24NEWS that Israel is weighing additional retaliatory measures against Macron, including the potential closure of the French consulate in Jerusalem, which primarily serves Palestinians in the West Bank.