Local News
New documentary by Winnipeg filmmaker Yolanda Papini-Pollock exposes horrors of Falun Gong persecution in China
By MYRON LOVE
Genocide can take different forms. The Holocaust, for example, and the more recent Rwandan genocide were condensed in a frenzy of killing. For the Indigenous peoples of the Americas and Australia, the killing and attempted erasure of their cultures transpired over several hundred years.
Then, there is the matter of the Falun Gong.
Falun Gong (also known as Falun Dafa and Qi Gong) is a practice combining simple exercises with meditation based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion and forbearance.Of ancient Chinese origin, the practice – with the encouragement of the Chinese Communist government – developed a very large following in modern China. In 1999, however, Li Peng, chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, decided that practicing Falun Gong was a threat to the Chinese Communist government. He initiated a thoroughgoing campaign to demonize the practice and eradicate anyone who continued to practice the tradition.
The horrors of the ensuing persecution of Chinese Falun Gong practitioners have been effectively brought out in filmmaker Yolanda Papini-Pollock’s new documentary, “Painful Truth: The Falun Gong Genocide”, which the filmmakers premiered at the Berney Theatre on Thursday, January 9.
The half hour film demonstrates once again how easy it can be to demonize members of a segment of a population – who may stand out because of their ethnic origin, race, religious beliefs or sexual orientation. What is unusual about the Falun Gong is that the people being persecuted are ethnic Chinese – no different than their fellow Chinese citizens – who were simply pursuing an activity (non-political) that made them feel better physically and mentally.
“Painful Truth” is, in a sense, a follow up to Papini-Pollock’s “Never Again: A Broken Promise”, a documentary focusing on genocide that included interviews with Holocaust survivor Edith Kimelman, as well as survivors of the Rwandan genocide, Yazidi persecution and a former Residential school student.
It was at the premiere of that film that Papini-Pollock learned about the plight of the Falun Gong. One of those in the audience was Dr. Maria Cheung, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Work, University of Manitoba, herself a Falun Gong practitioner and survivor of the Chinese gulag, who brought up the issue.
How many practitioners of Falun Gong are there in China? By 1999, about 100-million Chinese were involved in the practice of Falun Gong. Jiang Zemin feared that this had become a cult that might threaten the rule of the Chinese Communist government.
Maria Cheung observed that dictatorships – such as Communist China – need to continually be creating new “enemies” to keep the people onside.
The evening began with a demonstration of Falun Gong exercises by ten practitioners dressed in colourful garments.
Then, through visuals and interviews with former Falun Gong prisoners who are now living in Canada, “Painful Truth” delved into the multimedia propaganda campaign against Falun Gong, the social shunning, the large scale arrests and torture and, worst of all, the murders of Falun Gong prisoners for their body parts for transplantation.
The Chinese government’s harvesting of organs from Falun Gong prisoners was first exposed by Winnipeg’s own David Matas, a world leader in the fight for human rights, who, in 2009, in partnership with former Member of Parliament David Kilgour, released “Bloody Harvest: The Killing of Falun Gong for Their Organs”.
Both Matas and Cheung appeared on stage after the screening of the documentary to answer questions about the persecution of the Falun Gong. Matas explained that he learned about the Chinese Government’s organ harvesting through encounters he had as an immigration lawyer with Chinese immigrants to Canada who had been imprisoned for their practice of Falun Gong.
“They would talk about the torture, but also mention how they were subject to frequent blood tests and examinations of the health of their internal organs,” he says. While there are no public records or eye-witness accounts of Chinese organ harvesting from Falun Gong prisoners (whose bodies would have been cremated), Matas and Kilgour extrapolated from organ transplant figures from before 1999 and after.
Matas noted that China does not have a tradition or history of organ donation. Before 1999, he said, it was well known that the Chinese Government removed the organs of prisoners who were executed for the small number of organ transplants that took place. After 1999 – and the beginning of the arrests of Falun Gong practitioners, the number of organ transplants increased exponentially.
What has been the world’s response to the exposure of this sordid crime against humanity? Matas noted that Israel was a world leader in responding to this issue. Israel was paying all the expenses for Israelis travelling to China for organ transplants. After learning of the source of the transplanted organs, the Israeli government cut off insurance for organ transplants in China, criminalized participation in organ abuse abroad, set up an inspection system to check if Israeli hospitals are bringing in organs from outside the country and changed the rules so that people who know they are dying can choose to donate their organs for transplant after their passing.
He adds that 14 other countries – including Canada – have also passed or are in the process of passing rules monitoring the origins of organs for transplants.
The premiere was co-sponsored by Winnipeg Friends of Israel (which Papini-Pollock co-founded four years ago) along with B’nai Brith Canada and its League for Human Rights.
Local News
Application filed by two former members of Etz Chayim Congregation against the congregation to have their memberships restored dismissed by judge
The following is taken from the Canadian Jewish News website: “Manitoba’s Court of King’s Bench has dismissed Hadass Eviatar and David Hoult’s application challenging the termination of their membership at Congregation Etz Chayim. In his decision, Justice Vic Toews noted that, although Hoult’s letter describing a hypothetical attack on the synagogue may have lacked sensitivity given the political climate, he did not intend to threaten violence against congregants. However, the judge ruled that the court did not have jurisdiction to intervene in the membership dispute under Manitoba’s Corporations Act, finding that the couple had no financial, proprietary or economic interest that would entitle them to the remedies they sought. The judge concluded that religious organizations are generally free to determine their own membership rules and ordered each side to bear its own legal costs.”
If you would like to read the original article that broke the story about the battle between Hadaass Eviatar and David Hoult with Etz Chayim Congregation you can go to Epic Court Battle.”
Local News
Jewish Federation now says Jewish population of Winnipeg in 2021 (according to the census) was 13,940 – not the 16,000 figure that the Federation had been touting for years
By BERNIE BELLAN (Posted Oct. 27, 2026) Longtime readers of The Jewish Post & News (and this website) would probably know that I have long had a very strong interest in establishing as accurate figures as possible when it has come to reporting the size of Winnipeg’s Jewish community.
For years I argued that our Jewish Federation was exaggerating the size of our Jewish population. I heard the figure of 16,000 bandied about by leaders in our community quite often when it came to reporting the size of our Jewish population – without any empirical evidence to back that figure up.
I had long maintained that the only reasonably accurate figures when it came to reporting the size of Winnipeg’s Jewish population were those produced by the late Evelyn Katz, when she was the unofficial demographer for the Jewish Federation – over 30 years ago. What Evelyn would do is keep careful track of births, deaths, numbers of newcomers but, perhaps most important: the number of people who had left our community.
Thus, in August 2022 when I interviewed Faye Rosenberg Cohen who, at the time, was just about to retire as the Jewish Federation’s Chief Planning and Allocations Officer, I was somewhat astonished to hear Faye say, when I asked her what proportion of our Jewish community was made up of immigrants, she answered that “I can honestly say when I look at those numbers it’s somewhere around 1/3 of the community.”
In response, I asked: “So you’d say it’s somewhere between 4-5,000?”
Faye said: “I think it’s more than that.”
I wrote in that article, “I indicated my skepticism at that time, saying ‘You know that I’ve always been skeptical about the numbers that have been used by the Federation for the population of the Jewish community. I think though that it’s always been more of a case of identification – who identifies as Jewish.’ ”
Later, after the results of the 2021 census were released, I wrote that “if you take into account the results of the 2021 census, the Jewish community cannot be larger than 14,270 at a maximum. But that figure would also include anyone who had either said either their ethnic origin was Jewish or their religion was Jewish.”
Since many of the individuals who had said on the 2021 census that their ethnic origin was Jewish, but their religion was something else, I maintained that ascertaining the real size of our Jewish community was highly problematic.
Still, for the sake of argument I was willing to accept that, realistically, it was somewhere between 13,000-14,000 – but nowhere close to the figure of 16,000 that had come to be suggested by our then president of the Jewish Federation or by other leading figures in our community.
So, it was with a sense of satisfaction that I heard Sharon Graham, who is now the Jewish Federation’s Community Planning and Allocations Lead say to an audience of over 50 people who were at the Gwen Secter Centre on Thursday, October 22, that the Jewish community in 2021 was – at a maximum: 13,940.
Sharon was at the Gwen Secter Centre to speak to Remis Lecture attendees. Her presentation preceded a presentation by Jewish Federation CEO Jeff Lieberman. Sharon used a PowerPoint presentation to provide some very interesting insights into where our Jewish community was at in 2021- and I’m offering some parts of her presentation here for you to read because I thought they were so interesting.
I had actually made many of the same observations about the results of the 2021 census in my own reporting back in 2022, but seeing what I had written confirmed by the Jewish Federation’s point person on planning told me that Sharon has a much more realistic view of our community than did Faye Rosenberg Cohen.
Here, for instance, is a slide that shows the proportion of our Jewish community that is made up of immigrants. It’s slightly under one fifth, not the one third percentage that Faye had suggested.
But, what really set Sharon’s presentation apart from anything else I’ve ever seen presented by someone from the Jewish Federation – other than the aforementioned Evelyn Katz, was the slide she projected which showed that, while there had been a large influx of newcomers to Winnipeg’s Jewish community between 2016-2021 there had also been a significantly high number of people who had left our Jewish community in those same years, as you can see in the following slide:
That is something we just don’t hear discussed by leaders of our Jewish organizations, but let’s be realistic: For many newcomers who came to Winnipeg and were counted as new members of our Jewish community, Winnipeg – for a variety of reasons, was a stepping stone to other communities. It may have been for reasons of better job opportunities, moving closer to other family members, or – the reason that we hear so often when it comes to people saying they want to leave Winnipeg: the weather.
But, whatever the reason, Sharon’s figures show that, as much as GrowWinnipeg may have been an abiding success when it’s come to attracting newcomers to our Jewish community here, getting them to stay long term is a different story.
And, while there were other aspects of Sharon’s presentation that certainly merit discussion, especially the figures she produced about intermarriage, rather than delving into them here, I thought it useful simply to insert them for you, the reader, to see – and draw your own conclusions.
Local News
Marty Green expands his protest against extremist Jewish settlers to two more venues – and is arrested twice more
(Tuesday, October 27) We received the following press release about Marty Green being arrested again, both at the University of Manitoba and at Shaarey Zedek Synagogue:
Both sides came to blows on Saturday, October 24, at the Shaarey Zedek Synagogue as security personnel sought to prevent Marty Green from interfering with synagogue traffic as he protested just outside synagogue grounds against the actions of religious settlers in Israel’s occupied West Bank territory. Synagogue Executive Director Rena Secter Elbaze quickly intervened to prevent further escalation. Police arrived shorty thereafter and detained Green for 45 minutes before driving him home and releasing him. It is not clear whether their decision not to lay charges was the result of their own onsite investigation or whether it was at the request of the synagogue executive.
Green has now been arrested four times in the last month and faces multiple charges for disturbing the peace, including two episodes at the Asper Campus and one more this past Friday (Oct. 23) at the University of Manitoba. While Green says initially he was merely handing out leaflets (at the Asper Campus), since his first arrest on September 23, he has returned to the campus with a large placard and an acccordion, accompanying himself while singing songs with lyrics that include such phrases as “The Jews Are Bananas….B-A-N-A-N-A-S”. In addition to listing actions of the religious settlers as including arson, vandalism, and theft, he pointedly alleges that the IDF has been backing up the settlers in their actions.
Green had earlier notified the Shaarey Zedek that he was contemplating bringing his protest to the synagogue. He was told that if he attempted to enter the grounds he would be prevented from doing so. At that time, Secter Elbaze told Green that his intentions were inappropriate, declaring the synagogue to be “a house of worship dedicated to prayer, learning, community, and spiritual engagement.” Green responded that if the synagogue were willing to contact the Crown and inform them that “that there was never any legal basis for their claims that I was conducting myself inappropriately at the Asper Campus” (with regard to his earlier arrests) that he would “voluntarily refrain from carrying his informational campaign to the synagogue(s).”
Green further argues that the recent “psak” (religious ruling) by leading Israeli rabbi Rov Dov Lior, in which Lior declares that it is not merely permissible but praiseworthy for Jews to steal olives from Arab orchards….that this ruling brings his protest within the proper realm of religious discourse. He says further that if the local rabbis were willing to speak out to their congregations against the aforesaid psak, that he might have refrained from taking his campaign to their grounds.
Although Green was released on Saturday without charges, police confiscated his placard. They explained that it was being held as evidence pending an investigation by Major Crimes as to whether it constituted hate literature.
There was no further information given as to what happened at the University of Manitoba.
